Charley Eiseman
banner
ceiseman.bsky.social
Charley Eiseman
@ceiseman.bsky.social
Freelance naturalist, especially into leafminers, sawfly larvae, and other underappreciated herbivorous insects | http://bugtracks.wordpress.com
Looks to me like these are all indirect registers of normal cat tracks (i.e., hind feed landing approximately, but not precisely, where the front feet stepped).
January 23, 2026 at 5:31 PM
Agromyza torta is the first agromyzid known to roll leaves. The rolling is apparently induced during oviposition, and then the larva mines in the rolled leaf. This can be considered a gall, and the hackberry gall inducer A. deserta is a close relative. www.inaturalist.org/observations...
Agromyza torta
Agromyza torta from Laurinburg, NC 28352, USA on April 10, 2025 by tracysfeldman. miner on Sugar Hackberry
www.inaturalist.org
January 9, 2026 at 1:08 AM
No, have you reared it / do you have specimens / photos of the mines? The only anacua leafminers I know about are moths--Dialectica cordiella (Gracillariidae) and a Bucculatrix that I'm about to describe.
January 9, 2026 at 12:28 AM
And a paratype of Agromyza dichanthelii, which feeds on deertongue grass and other Dichanthelium spp. (the holotype came from my front yard in Massachusetts): bugguide.net/node/view/11...
Agromyza parca - Agromyza dichanthelii
An online resource devoted to North American insects, spiders and their kin, offering identification, images, and information.
bugguide.net
January 9, 2026 at 12:12 AM
Here's the holotype of Agromyza celtitexana (reared by John Schneider from hackberry, in Texas): bugguide.net/node/view/24...
lateral - Agromyza celtitexana
An online resource devoted to North American insects, spiders and their kin, offering identification, images, and information.
bugguide.net
January 9, 2026 at 12:12 AM
And a paratype of Agromyza dichanthelii, which feeds on deertongue grass and other Dichanthelium spp. (the holotype came from my front yard): bugguide.net/node/view/11...
January 9, 2026 at 12:08 AM
Huh. No image preview? Well, here's one:
December 22, 2025 at 10:43 PM
Not related to the "NJ" specimens I was looking at, but definitely of interest since recent literature states this moth was probably introduced in the Pacific Northwest in the early 1900s, and this note clearly documents its presence in Washington by 1893 (apparently introduced from Massachusetts).
December 15, 2025 at 11:18 AM
Thanks, I wasn't aware of that.
December 15, 2025 at 11:08 AM
You've never heard of it mining in early instars, have you? Seems to feed exclusively as a leaftier and on buds, as far as I can tell.
December 14, 2025 at 10:23 PM
It's possible someone sent her some host material from which she reared the specimens. As far as I can tell she didn't publish anything about this species (which at the time was known as Rhopobota vacciniana).
December 14, 2025 at 8:26 PM
Rhopobota naevana. I'm doing a review/revision of the North American species--the others are all Ilex specialists, mostly starting out as leafminers.
December 14, 2025 at 8:24 PM
Okay, another one from the same series, which mysteriously has the same date but clearly "90" rather than "91"... but my main question is, cranberry *what*? Oh, I see--"Tortrix."
December 14, 2025 at 7:12 PM
There is another specimen with the same Murtfeldt label, and it unambiguously says "NJ." It also clearly says "8/20.91", which makes me think the first one says "8/24.91" and not "6/24.91" as I originally thought.
December 14, 2025 at 5:17 PM
I love those guys. I've found them wandering around inside leaf mines a couple of times!
December 9, 2025 at 2:47 AM
Interesting idea. I've never seen anything like this before in the thousands of Cameraria mines I've looked at, so I suspect it's something else. These look very much like the exit slits that some leaf-mining larvae make when leaving their mines, but Cameraria larvae all pupate within their mines.
December 5, 2025 at 6:15 PM
Reposted by Charley Eiseman
See the influential paper and @undark.org commentary on Monsanto's ghostwriting by Alexander Kaurov & @naomioreskes.bsky.social: undark.org/2025/08/15/o... #pesticides #agtwitter
December 3, 2025 at 3:58 PM
Not sure, but probably not very many. It's maybe worth noting that a good number of them are photos taken before I was an active iNat user, posted as photo vouchers to cite in my papers on Nantucket leafminers, gall inducers, etc.
December 5, 2025 at 2:38 PM