Carlos E. Perez (IntuitMachine)
ceperez.bsky.social
Carlos E. Perez (IntuitMachine)
@ceperez.bsky.social
Author: Artificial Intuition, Fluency & Empathy, DL Playbook, Patterns for Generative AI, Patterns for Agentic AI

https://twitter.com/IntuitMachine
https://intuitionmachine.gumroad.com
https://medium.com/intuitionmachine
30/
Moloch is not inevitable.

He's just patient.

And he's betting we've forgotten how to fight.

Let's prove him wrong.

/end
January 11, 2026 at 10:35 AM
29/

The question isn't whether Moloch can be beaten.
History already answered that.
The question is whether we'll build the next generation of traps before the current ones finish eroding.
January 11, 2026 at 10:34 AM
28/

I used to read "Meditations on Moloch" and feel despair.
Now I read it as a diagnostic manual.

Moloch isn't a god.

He's a bug.

A well-understood bug with known patches.
January 11, 2026 at 10:34 AM
27/
This won't happen automatically.

Moloch is the default.

Escape requires deliberate construction.

But "requires effort" ≠ "impossible."
January 11, 2026 at 10:34 AM
26/
But the method still works:

Identify where individual rationality → collective harm
Find ways to make defection visible
Build mechanisms that make defection costly
Design structures where cooperation pays
January 11, 2026 at 10:34 AM
25/
New Moloch-traps are needed now.

For AI development. For social media dynamics. For climate coordination. For attention economics.

The old traps don't fit the new games.
January 11, 2026 at 10:34 AM
24/

The generation that built rule of law, property rights, democratic norms—they did impossible things.

Not because they were smarter.

Because they understood something we've forgotten:
Coordination problems are solvable.
January 11, 2026 at 10:33 AM
22/
Here's the brutal truth:

Alignment isn't a state. It's a process.

Every Moloch-trap requires active maintenance.

Stop maintaining, and Moloch seeps back in.

23/
This is actually good news.

It means the question isn't "Can we escape Moloch?"

It's "Are we willing to maintain our escapes?"
January 11, 2026 at 10:33 AM
21/
"But wait," you say. "These systems are failing. Moloch is winning."

Fair.

Let me reframe:

These systems are eroding.

Moloch doesn't conquer—he corrodes.
January 11, 2026 at 10:33 AM
20/
This is the secret hidden in plain sight:

Every institution that works is a Moloch-trap.

Markets. Courts. Democracies. Professional norms. Reputation systems.

All are mechanisms that convert individual selfishness into collective benefit.
January 11, 2026 at 10:33 AM
19/
This is engineering, not prayer.

You don't beat Moloch by being virtuous.

You beat him by changing the game so that selfish actors accidentally cooperate.
January 11, 2026 at 10:32 AM
18/

So what's the actual formula?

Invert Moloch's four requirements:

✓ Build coordination infrastructure (communication + trust)
✓ Make defection visible (transparency architecture)
✓ Make defection costly (credible commitment mechanisms)
✓ Make cooperation pay (positive-sum structure)
January 11, 2026 at 10:32 AM
17/

I'm not saying these systems are perfect.

I'm saying they exist.

They prove that coordination failures can be engineered away.

Moloch-escape isn't a fantasy. It's been done.

Repeatedly.
January 11, 2026 at 10:32 AM
16/

Then humans invented something weird:

Elections.
Peaceful power transfer. Losers accept results. Winners don't execute opponents.

Sounds impossible. Yet here we are.
January 11, 2026 at 10:32 AM