No

And it’s a top heavy class, which we aren’t going to be in anyway.

Yeah 3 years is my preference for Framber, but it may well take 4.

Just based on reporting on Freddy, and the fact Ryan has 2 years control it’s going to be an “ouch” price and I just don’t think it’s great bang for the buck

LMAO

The “Mets aren’t a destination” narrative that people have been forming is a little grating. What do you think about that?

Like it was never gonna happen

For the troops

Agree Will is great but he called it a “preference” to stay short term, I don’t take that as hard and fast.

The under 4 thing is mostly speculative and I think we have mistaken “Mets want the Tucker market to come back to them” as “Mets want a short term/opt out structure” when it more likely means they don’t want to go to 10/400 but are very or at 7/280

Also, you’re subtracting Montas and Helsley from the group. And for the rotation to be not improve at all you have to believe that Senga/Manaea/Peterson will aggregate 140 innings of 6.5 ERA like they did in August/September. Even if they pitch to a 4.50, that saves ~30 runs, about 3 wins.

All three guys we are mad about were “good” immediately.

People keep saying “you can’t rely on prospects” when everybody they are upset about losing were one time Mets prospects

Also I know we’re not allowed to talk like this bc we can’t have new homegrown players apparently but there’s a real chance that Carson Benge is a net positive over Nimmo next year between his bat and his defense.

Also people misunderstand defense as the reason they let Pete go. It wasn’t.

They don’t think the bat will deliver enough value to justify the contract he got. A contract he got that *one* team was willing to give.