Train full of takes, approaching
@charleyonthemta.bsky.social
Former influencer. Principle of Charity. This isn’t a good venue for argumentation. Not the time for doomism. S—-lib, normie, cringey.
I’m going to read your bleets rather than read her/their writings. Thank you for the précis.
December 2, 2025 at 4:23 AM
I’m going to read your bleets rather than read her/their writings. Thank you for the précis.
Not every lie is intended to be believed. They are statements of intent.
December 2, 2025 at 3:58 AM
Not every lie is intended to be believed. They are statements of intent.
Gosh. This is weak sauce Matt.
Energy efficiency, hence the “technology-forcing” laws and regs behind it, has been wildly successful — creating value, saving money & pollution. It is abundance.
The rate-base utility model, OTOH, is a recipe for boondoggles, not abundance. QED.
Energy efficiency, hence the “technology-forcing” laws and regs behind it, has been wildly successful — creating value, saving money & pollution. It is abundance.
The rate-base utility model, OTOH, is a recipe for boondoggles, not abundance. QED.
December 2, 2025 at 3:41 AM
Gosh. This is weak sauce Matt.
Energy efficiency, hence the “technology-forcing” laws and regs behind it, has been wildly successful — creating value, saving money & pollution. It is abundance.
The rate-base utility model, OTOH, is a recipe for boondoggles, not abundance. QED.
Energy efficiency, hence the “technology-forcing” laws and regs behind it, has been wildly successful — creating value, saving money & pollution. It is abundance.
The rate-base utility model, OTOH, is a recipe for boondoggles, not abundance. QED.
It *is* the best lime seltzer. I’m not judging your choices.
December 2, 2025 at 3:19 AM
It *is* the best lime seltzer. I’m not judging your choices.
Also: Anti-private-equity politics would be very powerful in D campaigns.
November 30, 2025 at 3:09 PM
Also: Anti-private-equity politics would be very powerful in D campaigns.
So presumably Trump just made 1,000’s more permanent, very committed enemies, right?
He can‘t serve only himself without pissing off a *lot* of people. That‘s what we’re seeing.
He can‘t serve only himself without pissing off a *lot* of people. That‘s what we’re seeing.
November 30, 2025 at 3:08 PM
So presumably Trump just made 1,000’s more permanent, very committed enemies, right?
He can‘t serve only himself without pissing off a *lot* of people. That‘s what we’re seeing.
He can‘t serve only himself without pissing off a *lot* of people. That‘s what we’re seeing.
Sunshine is (checks markets)
… still free
… still free
November 30, 2025 at 1:01 AM
Sunshine is (checks markets)
… still free
… still free
Maybe Trump has cost his guy 20+ points and should stay out. But hey, do what seems right! 🤷🏻♂️
November 29, 2025 at 3:05 AM
Maybe Trump has cost his guy 20+ points and should stay out. But hey, do what seems right! 🤷🏻♂️
It is definitely true that we, as Americans, should expect more from Republicans. We act like we have no influence at all on them, and that’s a self-fulfilling prophecy. Their fear of electoral defeat is only palpable if you’re active and visible all the time.
November 29, 2025 at 2:22 AM
It is definitely true that we, as Americans, should expect more from Republicans. We act like we have no influence at all on them, and that’s a self-fulfilling prophecy. Their fear of electoral defeat is only palpable if you’re active and visible all the time.