chezgeller.bsky.social
@chezgeller.bsky.social
Politics is everything. As is evidence. As is food.
I do not understand why the reporter cannot come back with: "What? That doesn’t answer the question; could you please answer the question?"
November 28, 2025 at 5:36 AM
I’ve never been on that other social media site. Does anyone ever call him out? Or gently point out the error of his ways?
November 25, 2025 at 8:56 PM
That "if" does a lot of work in your sentence.
November 16, 2025 at 5:29 PM
Not really sure how The Onion continues as a going concern.
November 6, 2025 at 5:14 AM
Sort of surprised that their initial response was not along the lines of “your mom…”
October 31, 2025 at 7:26 PM
Good one. And, yes better. The one I suggested would be better used following them around.
October 7, 2025 at 10:25 AM
Hope their next tune is this one:

youtu.be/s3SZ5sIMY6o?...
The Imperial March (Darth Vader's Theme)
YouTube video by John Williams - Topic
youtu.be
October 6, 2025 at 11:54 PM
I understand the potential bore part, but is it used, if in context, as a way to show an hypocrisy?
October 6, 2025 at 3:43 AM
Ummm, I THINK I understand your point, and I know you know this, but: ALL are to be afforded due process.
October 4, 2025 at 10:32 PM
How many in the doj are resigning?
September 26, 2025 at 7:30 AM
Your point?
September 21, 2025 at 1:59 PM
Please post the exact name and date of this study so we may ALL request it with specificity. Even if not received, the request would be logged somehow, someway.
September 17, 2025 at 5:48 AM
Ha! Yup —> I did that at about the same time!
September 16, 2025 at 1:41 AM
Maybe the best way to honor the death of Charlie is to demand the release of the files as this was one of his most fervent hopes.
September 14, 2025 at 3:37 AM
But it’s not sarcasm. And it’s treated as a quote. So it’s misleading. I think that the take on it is correct, but it should not be listed as a quote. The OP easily could have written something like, I’m paraphrasing here, but…
September 13, 2025 at 4:28 PM
That certainly was the sentiment, but you have quote marks around something that is not a quote. You should delete this.
September 13, 2025 at 10:18 AM
Wait. Really? His son is fan of ck and that ipso facto disqualifies the father for office?
September 13, 2025 at 12:38 AM
Maybe they can honor his memory by demanding the Epstein files, something Charlie fervently wanted out in the public sphere.
September 12, 2025 at 6:57 PM