chris
@chris-stl.bsky.social
then we’d all watch football, which in those days was called “baseball”
>thought i knew this guy years ago
>>stared for way too long close up
> turns out i'm just thinking of patrick stump (who he doesn't even look THAT much like lmaooo)
>>stared for way too long close up
> turns out i'm just thinking of patrick stump (who he doesn't even look THAT much like lmaooo)
February 6, 2026 at 5:51 AM
>thought i knew this guy years ago
>>stared for way too long close up
> turns out i'm just thinking of patrick stump (who he doesn't even look THAT much like lmaooo)
>>stared for way too long close up
> turns out i'm just thinking of patrick stump (who he doesn't even look THAT much like lmaooo)
I'm sorry so close; it's actually "What's Right"
February 6, 2026 at 5:50 AM
I'm sorry so close; it's actually "What's Right"
How does boot leather taste
January 24, 2026 at 3:45 PM
How does boot leather taste
/immediately clicks follow all anyway
January 23, 2026 at 1:43 AM
/immediately clicks follow all anyway
*sigh* is there a starter pack for wanting to think less about the ’aints tho lol
January 23, 2026 at 1:43 AM
*sigh* is there a starter pack for wanting to think less about the ’aints tho lol
Don’t Tread on Me and Don’t Step on the Dope
December 11, 2025 at 2:20 AM
Don’t Tread on Me and Don’t Step on the Dope
someone get Michael Barrett on the line for the love of god
October 11, 2025 at 4:19 AM
someone get Michael Barrett on the line for the love of god
Even setting aside the whole “pbs won’t exist by next Tuesday” issue there’s no way in hell someone like Fred Rogers takes off in the 21st century hellscape sadly
May 15, 2025 at 11:00 PM
Even setting aside the whole “pbs won’t exist by next Tuesday” issue there’s no way in hell someone like Fred Rogers takes off in the 21st century hellscape sadly
This is pretty clearly just desperately looking for any possible explanation for the Trump wave besides “more people wanted to vote for Trump.” The analysis is so transparent in trying to coax the data into showing something irregular that it’s kind of laughable. Surely turnout could increase
May 9, 2025 at 8:14 PM
This is pretty clearly just desperately looking for any possible explanation for the Trump wave besides “more people wanted to vote for Trump.” The analysis is so transparent in trying to coax the data into showing something irregular that it’s kind of laughable. Surely turnout could increase
Hi! I looked at them. I have a law degree and one on political science that involved a lot of work with election datasets. This is sour grapes nonsense and I wish you’d stop what you’re doing. There are lots of problems with your priors about “expected” results but I’ll get to the point:
May 9, 2025 at 8:11 PM
Hi! I looked at them. I have a law degree and one on political science that involved a lot of work with election datasets. This is sour grapes nonsense and I wish you’d stop what you’re doing. There are lots of problems with your priors about “expected” results but I’ll get to the point: