Chris Cook
@chriscook.news
15K followers 460 following 300 posts
ft senior reporter. south london nationalist. articles with my byline get posted automagically on @cook.report
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
chriscook.news
Not a lot of people familiar with the “political uniforms” legislation
chriscook.news
Hahaha - okay fair enough
chriscook.news
pah. While you’re on a history tour, why not include Preston North End and Ipswich
Reposted by Chris Cook
kayewiggins.ft.com
As Trump pressures the Department of Justice to target his opponents, my colleagues @chriscook.news, Paul Caruana Galizia and I dug deep into a DoJ unit - the US Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York - which had been known for its independence.

Full story: on.ft.com/42VG5IK
Rule of law in the Trump era: the demoralised prosecutors of SDNY
[FREE TO READ] The Southern District of New York once took pride in its independence. But pressure from the administration is changing the way its lawyers operate
on.ft.com
chriscook.news
people need to lay off Ruben Amorim — I really think he’s got it in him to manage a top 6 finish and coming back up via the playoffs next year
chriscook.news
We should give Jim Ratcliffe another knighthood for contribution to gaiety of the nation.
Reposted by Chris Cook
helenwarrell.bsky.social
What is Russia's spy ship Yantar and why has it been loitering in British waters? The FT investigates the threat to undersea cables & the work of Moscow's secret deep-sea research unit, GUGI, as an agent of sabotage. With @chriscook.news Daria Mosolova & David Djambazov

www.ft.com/content/0b35...
The Russian spy ship stalking Europe’s subsea cables
Covert operations in waters surrounding the British Isles pose a grave threat to critical infrastructure and a fresh challenge to Nato
www.ft.com
chriscook.news
@davidgerard.co.uk given that your allegations were wrong, can you please delete your posts about us, which are still online for some reason and free for other people to see and share.
chriscook.news
Just to be clear, that guy is completely 100% wrong. bsky.app/profile/chri...
chriscook.news
This is wrong.

a) The article literally states we did the analysis with AI. We used semantic search to ID paragraphs relating to a topic, then grouped text into categories by their meaning.

b) The model outputs were, as below, boolean indicators about whether something fit a category.
chriscook.news
Just to be clear, that guy is completely 100% wrong. bsky.app/profile/chri...
chriscook.news
This is wrong.

a) The article literally states we did the analysis with AI. We used semantic search to ID paragraphs relating to a topic, then grouped text into categories by their meaning.

b) The model outputs were, as below, boolean indicators about whether something fit a category.
chriscook.news
Just to be clear, that guy is completely 100% wrong. bsky.app/profile/chri...
chriscook.news
This is wrong.

a) The article literally states we did the analysis with AI. We used semantic search to ID paragraphs relating to a topic, then grouped text into categories by their meaning.

b) The model outputs were, as below, boolean indicators about whether something fit a category.
chriscook.news
Just to be clear, that guy is completely 100% wrong. bsky.app/profile/chri...
chriscook.news
This is wrong.

a) The article literally states we did the analysis with AI. We used semantic search to ID paragraphs relating to a topic, then grouped text into categories by their meaning.

b) The model outputs were, as below, boolean indicators about whether something fit a category.
chriscook.news
Just to be clear, that guy is just wrong bsky.app/profile/chri...
chriscook.news
This is wrong.

a) The article literally states we did the analysis with AI. We used semantic search to ID paragraphs relating to a topic, then grouped text into categories by their meaning.

b) The model outputs were, as below, boolean indicators about whether something fit a category.
chriscook.news
Just to be clear, that guy is completely 100% wrong. bsky.app/profile/chri...
chriscook.news
This is wrong.

a) The article literally states we did the analysis with AI. We used semantic search to ID paragraphs relating to a topic, then grouped text into categories by their meaning.

b) The model outputs were, as below, boolean indicators about whether something fit a category.
chriscook.news
Just to be clear, that guy is completely 100% wrong. bsky.app/profile/chri...
chriscook.news
This is wrong.

a) The article literally states we did the analysis with AI. We used semantic search to ID paragraphs relating to a topic, then grouped text into categories by their meaning.

b) The model outputs were, as below, boolean indicators about whether something fit a category.
chriscook.news
Just to be clear, that guy is completely 100% wrong. bsky.app/profile/chri...
chriscook.news
This is wrong.

a) The article literally states we did the analysis with AI. We used semantic search to ID paragraphs relating to a topic, then grouped text into categories by their meaning.

b) The model outputs were, as below, boolean indicators about whether something fit a category.
chriscook.news
no, it did something we could never have done -- reviewing and sorting 7,500 separate paragraphs across five years of 10-Ks/10-Qs and one year of earnings calls. it created work for me, it took it from no-one.
chriscook.news
they paid me to research, write and edit this. we did this. the ai did none of those things.
chriscook.news
I think it's three quotes now?
chriscook.news
i have a lot on this week. but using AI tools to group them by their own meanings (without regard to anything else-- just reading the text) is something we do a lot. you don;t need a load of the old logits or ML stuff we used for this. it's better, and faster -- as we know from validation tests
chriscook.news
i'd like to make a correction to my correction: actually it's fine, i misread my own copy.
chriscook.news
we did! we used the API to categorise quotes! "is this text in a well defined category" is a really good use of them! so you can ask them "does this mention XYZ" and get them to reply TRUE/FALSE. Then we do validation exercises to check they do what we wanted. The *TEXT* never comes out of it.