𝘊𝘩𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘢𝘢𝘯 𝘛𝘢𝘺𝘭𝘰𝘳 📐
@christiaan.bsky.social
Chartered Architectural Technologist MCIAT
Vectorworks Specialist
Co-director beehive.archi
Health & Fitness • Food & Nutrition • Gardening • Tech 🇳🇿🇬🇧🇵🇹🇪🇺
Vectorworks Specialist
Co-director beehive.archi
Health & Fitness • Food & Nutrition • Gardening • Tech 🇳🇿🇬🇧🇵🇹🇪🇺
Strategy on phasing out natural gas
December 10, 2025 at 7:53 PM
Strategy on phasing out natural gas
NZ seems to have to go through this pain every now and then when governments are paralysed by blind faith that the market will sort things out.
December 10, 2025 at 7:08 PM
NZ seems to have to go through this pain every now and then when governments are paralysed by blind faith that the market will sort things out.
I’m sure that’s wonderful, but my favourite Chinese restaurants are where the chefs probably don’t speak much English, the tables are full of Asians and Sichuan is on the menu!
December 10, 2025 at 9:42 AM
I’m sure that’s wonderful, but my favourite Chinese restaurants are where the chefs probably don’t speak much English, the tables are full of Asians and Sichuan is on the menu!
Except that of course Chinese is the greatest cuisine on the planet!!
December 9, 2025 at 4:53 PM
Except that of course Chinese is the greatest cuisine on the planet!!
If they have no warrant you don’t open the door and you tell them to get off your property
December 9, 2025 at 10:38 AM
If they have no warrant you don’t open the door and you tell them to get off your property
Sure, but the crime is not trespass.
December 9, 2025 at 2:44 AM
Sure, but the crime is not trespass.
No one's arguing she didn't interfere with private property. They argument put by the original commenter was that they're trespassing.
December 9, 2025 at 2:44 AM
No one's arguing she didn't interfere with private property. They argument put by the original commenter was that they're trespassing.
Sure, but it's not trespass.
December 9, 2025 at 2:43 AM
Sure, but it's not trespass.
That's a very good point, but they are more likely to be ICE.
December 9, 2025 at 2:42 AM
That's a very good point, but they are more likely to be ICE.
No, it means they can't be prosecuted for trespass, only damage.
December 9, 2025 at 2:41 AM
No, it means they can't be prosecuted for trespass, only damage.
1. Agreed, no right to touch the camera.
2. A warrant is not needed to approach and knock on a door.
3. We don't know if they had a warrant or not.
4. They are federal law enforcement officers/agents of the US Department of Homeland Security.
2. A warrant is not needed to approach and knock on a door.
3. We don't know if they had a warrant or not.
4. They are federal law enforcement officers/agents of the US Department of Homeland Security.
December 9, 2025 at 1:46 AM
1. Agreed, no right to touch the camera.
2. A warrant is not needed to approach and knock on a door.
3. We don't know if they had a warrant or not.
4. They are federal law enforcement officers/agents of the US Department of Homeland Security.
2. A warrant is not needed to approach and knock on a door.
3. We don't know if they had a warrant or not.
4. They are federal law enforcement officers/agents of the US Department of Homeland Security.
They weren't entering the home. They were approaching the door.
December 9, 2025 at 1:41 AM
They weren't entering the home. They were approaching the door.
They don't need to be invited to approach a door. A locked gate would be needed to stop them at the property boundary.
Yes they interfered with private property (illegal), but they're not trespassing by approaching the door.
Yes they interfered with private property (illegal), but they're not trespassing by approaching the door.
December 9, 2025 at 1:38 AM
They don't need to be invited to approach a door. A locked gate would be needed to stop them at the property boundary.
Yes they interfered with private property (illegal), but they're not trespassing by approaching the door.
Yes they interfered with private property (illegal), but they're not trespassing by approaching the door.
All we see is that they approach a door (perfectly legal) and tamper with the security camera (generally illegal). You can't make any judgements beyond that. For all we know, there might not have even been anybody home.
December 9, 2025 at 1:21 AM
All we see is that they approach a door (perfectly legal) and tamper with the security camera (generally illegal). You can't make any judgements beyond that. For all we know, there might not have even been anybody home.
They don't need a warrant to approach a door. They're simply not trespassing. Let's stick with what they do get wrong, which is plenty.
December 9, 2025 at 1:18 AM
They don't need a warrant to approach a door. They're simply not trespassing. Let's stick with what they do get wrong, which is plenty.
You can't get ICE agents for trespass when approaching a front door. Trespass requires being on property for an unlawful purpose.
December 9, 2025 at 12:36 AM
You can't get ICE agents for trespass when approaching a front door. Trespass requires being on property for an unlawful purpose.
And we've already learnt that AI can be creative. The first examples were Chess and Go strategies; ones that humans had never thought of before.
December 8, 2025 at 6:22 PM
And we've already learnt that AI can be creative. The first examples were Chess and Go strategies; ones that humans had never thought of before.
But those companies have entrenched interests for other forms of architectural documentation. More likely it'll come from a startup without any baggage.
It is funny to see some of the architectural slop that AI creates, but it's only a matter of time before it's not.
It is funny to see some of the architectural slop that AI creates, but it's only a matter of time before it's not.
December 8, 2025 at 6:21 PM
But those companies have entrenched interests for other forms of architectural documentation. More likely it'll come from a startup without any baggage.
It is funny to see some of the architectural slop that AI creates, but it's only a matter of time before it's not.
It is funny to see some of the architectural slop that AI creates, but it's only a matter of time before it's not.
Well, let's see. I'm not convinced it will be a bad thing.
December 8, 2025 at 6:16 PM
Well, let's see. I'm not convinced it will be a bad thing.
I wouldn’t expect anything less from FIFA. Corrupt to the core.
December 5, 2025 at 6:35 PM
I wouldn’t expect anything less from FIFA. Corrupt to the core.
Trump is pure greed
December 5, 2025 at 9:32 AM
Trump is pure greed
“[We voted for him] because we believed he was an agent of chaos”.
He got what he voted for. Choose better next time.
He got what he voted for. Choose better next time.
December 5, 2025 at 3:21 AM
“[We voted for him] because we believed he was an agent of chaos”.
He got what he voted for. Choose better next time.
He got what he voted for. Choose better next time.
Soft on dictators and soft on crime
December 2, 2025 at 5:54 PM
Soft on dictators and soft on crime
Smells of incompetence rather not wanting to answer the questions. NZ voters deserve better than that.
December 2, 2025 at 9:41 AM
Smells of incompetence rather not wanting to answer the questions. NZ voters deserve better than that.