The Expansion Check:
Personal, Does this make me feel smaller, tighter, contracted or more open, lighter.
Or:
Does it expand for honesty, dignity and agency
The Expansion Check:
Personal, Does this make me feel smaller, tighter, contracted or more open, lighter.
Or:
Does it expand for honesty, dignity and agency
a return to clear lenses,
where truth isn’t a prop,
and governance isn’t a stage play,
but a public trust.
A politics that remembers
it was built for people,
not for an actor’s puny, punitive expressions,
not for the theatrics of grievance,
balance the system for people.
a return to clear lenses,
where truth isn’t a prop,
and governance isn’t a stage play,
but a public trust.
A politics that remembers
it was built for people,
not for an actor’s puny, punitive expressions,
not for the theatrics of grievance,
balance the system for people.
That’s literally the definition of evidence‑based practice and science. See, they admitted their 2024 predictions about climate were a little off, re-analyzed, re-published, admitted their mistake.
That’s literally the definition of evidence‑based practice and science. See, they admitted their 2024 predictions about climate were a little off, re-analyzed, re-published, admitted their mistake.
Hence, why my thoughts of institutionalizing him seems fitting
Hence, why my thoughts of institutionalizing him seems fitting
The Senate is positioned to block that restoration again, despite the subsidies having broad public impact and having lapsed at the end of last year.
The Senate already rejected this proposal in December and is likely to do so again. They should pay
The Senate is positioned to block that restoration again, despite the subsidies having broad public impact and having lapsed at the end of last year.
The Senate already rejected this proposal in December and is likely to do so again. They should pay
at the same time they are pointing to tRump's fraudulant claims about the 2020 election. So, if Jack Smith should be prosecuted, should also not tRump. Fair question right?
at the same time they are pointing to tRump's fraudulant claims about the 2020 election. So, if Jack Smith should be prosecuted, should also not tRump. Fair question right?
It's Wednesday, "again"
Science finds water is still wet, "again"
tRump caught lying, "again'
Sheesh, changes it to reality, doesn't it?
It's Wednesday, "again"
Science finds water is still wet, "again"
tRump caught lying, "again'
Sheesh, changes it to reality, doesn't it?
It's meaningful when someone says “Enough chaos. Unless you have evidence, stop.” That shouldn’t be a radical stance, but lately it feels like one.
It's meaningful when someone says “Enough chaos. Unless you have evidence, stop.” That shouldn’t be a radical stance, but lately it feels like one.