colfer.bsky.social
@colfer.bsky.social
(Spoiler: “nothing for anyone is always the real agenda. Just as “why should the middle class get services they can afford?” gets followed up good-cop-bad-cop style with “why should the poor get services they don’t contribute to?”)
January 2, 2026 at 12:54 AM
(Spoiler: “nothing for anyone is always the real agenda. Just as “why should the middle class get services they can afford?” gets followed up good-cop-bad-cop style with “why should the poor get services they don’t contribute to?”)
If he so wished, he could just as easily make the same argument about fixing SEND education or fixing school buildings (wait, I thought we fixed them all using PFI in the Blair era?) or retaining teachers: “why should middle class parents who can afford their own SEND provision blah blah blah?”
January 2, 2026 at 12:51 AM
If he so wished, he could just as easily make the same argument about fixing SEND education or fixing school buildings (wait, I thought we fixed them all using PFI in the Blair era?) or retaining teachers: “why should middle class parents who can afford their own SEND provision blah blah blah?”
Not to mention this stuff, which seems to have been memory holed
www.theguardian.com/politics/200...
www.theguardian.com/politics/200...
Blair blames spate of murders on black culture
· Political correctness not helping, says PM· Community leaders react angrily to comments
www.theguardian.com
January 2, 2026 at 12:40 AM
Not to mention this stuff, which seems to have been memory holed
www.theguardian.com/politics/200...
www.theguardian.com/politics/200...
Pah, we only have your word for that
January 1, 2026 at 7:58 AM
Pah, we only have your word for that
This guy clearly got his human suit from the same factory as Michael Gove
December 31, 2025 at 10:38 AM
This guy clearly got his human suit from the same factory as Michael Gove
”The alternative“:
December 29, 2025 at 9:37 PM
”The alternative“:
They *still* occasionally have climate change deniers on to “debate“ climate change in contradiction to their own policies
December 29, 2025 at 7:51 PM
They *still* occasionally have climate change deniers on to “debate“ climate change in contradiction to their own policies
I don’t have a Twitter account any more but just search for their account‘s name and Soros. Like I say, they’ve deleted the tweets but you can work out what they’re saying from the rest of the conversation. And, of course, this was one of their founders:
December 29, 2025 at 6:41 AM
I don’t have a Twitter account any more but just search for their account‘s name and Soros. Like I say, they’ve deleted the tweets but you can work out what they’re saying from the rest of the conversation. And, of course, this was one of their founders:
They’re also Soros conspiracy theorists. They’ve deleted all their tweets mentioning him but you can tell what they’re saying by the tweets the deleted tweets are replying to, and the replies to the deleted tweets.
December 29, 2025 at 6:33 AM
They’re also Soros conspiracy theorists. They’ve deleted all their tweets mentioning him but you can tell what they’re saying by the tweets the deleted tweets are replying to, and the replies to the deleted tweets.
I feel this needs to grandfather-in Stephen Graham in some way
December 26, 2025 at 12:40 AM
I feel this needs to grandfather-in Stephen Graham in some way
That’s some top class goalpost shifting, buddy.
December 18, 2025 at 6:23 PM
That’s some top class goalpost shifting, buddy.
If any other ethnic or religious minority were experiencing a genocide and you told them “don’t use this chant to criticise the state carrying out the genocide - you should be thrown in jail if you do - even though it doesn’t mention or even refer to my ethnic group“…oh. wait…
I'll say it again: if any other ethnic or religious minority said "please don't use this particular term or chant, you might not have bad intentions but it is deeply racist and threatening to us", the reaction would be mortified apology.
And that's without a mass terror event four days ago
And that's without a mass terror event four days ago
December 18, 2025 at 5:27 PM
Where did Finally… state that it was appropriate to chant it at a funeral or anyone of any religion? And where did Cunliffe restrict her criticism to its being chanted at funerals?
December 18, 2025 at 5:18 PM
Where did Finally… state that it was appropriate to chant it at a funeral or anyone of any religion? And where did Cunliffe restrict her criticism to its being chanted at funerals?
*Its best, not irrational
December 12, 2025 at 4:41 PM
*Its best, not irrational
The main reason I can still enjoy Father Ted when (for example) Morrissey has ruined The Smiths for me is that irrational best bits now read like a pointed attack on Linehan’s present self e.g.
December 12, 2025 at 2:52 PM
The main reason I can still enjoy Father Ted when (for example) Morrissey has ruined The Smiths for me is that irrational best bits now read like a pointed attack on Linehan’s present self e.g.