Tha Verge, here.

 Adlc, ici.

 Summary of DMA Review consultation, here. Submissions, here.

 TechPolicyPress, here. Good job, but I wouldn't call it controversy TBH.

 Donotpassgo.ca, here.

 Euractiv, here. While some influential US/EU academics want us to largely forget the DMA and go back to a revised 102 😔.

 R. Podszun, F. Scott Morton, here. I agree that more should be done in trying to make102 somewhat functional, but we aren't done with the DMA at all - as (current and past) Big Tech consultants would like you to believe and see us doing ("all that money spent on Trump and lobbyists/consultants should finally produce results, rein in pesky EU regulators, let's set an example for the world here, look at what US oil companies got!"). It's just the beginning, actually.

 Here. "No settled view" in the UK (ongoing research?) - you can't be more diplomatic than that.

 Msn.com, here.

  --- Discuss... Press Release, here.

 M. Kirkwood, here. [If teaching at an Italian University counts as European Antitrust Activity, activity, 2025 was the first year I really struggled teaching traditional competition law - perceived mostly as a colossal waste of time for my Students and I, a bit like teaching International Law in 2026 I guess]

 Video here. Good format? Unsure! They allocated most of the available time to a presentation delivered by a US company (dialogue with 'industry,' they call it). Supporting economic growth! Societal benefits spreading across the economy!

 Brave/i, here.

 The Cyber Express, here.

Euractiv, here. [Example of "gloves": it's all about innovation! Even US brain-washed and financed, hard-liners among EU academics will come to realize it in 2026 - perhaps].

 The Japan News, here.

Our Curious Amalgam, here.

  --- Luzia... AGCM, here.

 C. Doctorow, here.

 EC, here.

 Webstream here.

Here.

 Find out here.

 OECD, here.

  --- NotebookLM generated   Here.