And I think this pattern is a major source of fostering “out of touch” rather than being “in touch”

And these patterns perpetuate into pathologies, relative concrete coming from the mixing bowl of romantic reverie, from consciously and/or unconsciously playing the slippery slope game of wanna-be reality’s Chair referee

& people, seemingly especially manybodies of men, in-kind do whatever they can to falsely or truthfully be unavailable in order to signal their supposed “virtue, value” & thus “attractiveness,” aka “viability, validity,” which is actually literally the absence of viability, disastrous for connecting

As in people, esp trad women seeking men, perceive the absence of availability as signaling “virtue, value” and thus “attractive,” resulting emptiness, vapidity, in place of “relating, relationship” and resulting dissatisfaction + disconnection

And we can see this absence of accessing availability as even something that people pride themselves upon, and becomes a signal of “virtue, value, attractiveness”

…by becoming absent “with, parallel” them, sacrificing your current relationship with the Now, unplanting your own accessible intimacy within presencing in empty, hollow exchange for unexistence, unconsciousness

So for some, if not many, the only way to “meet” those that are disproportionately “existing” within the extreme/edge/polarizing layer of presumption (past + future, unpresent) is to join them in the false (fall’s) layer of “presumption“ -…

By disproportionately “existing” exclusively within the extreme/edge/polarizing layer of presumption (past + future), people leave the infinite elements & value of the present, the entire spectrum of availability, the whole pie, wide open for the taking, while they continue unexisting in the missing

Presumption (past + future, no presents) becomes a false layer of “reality” people of intra- & inter- acceleration “live within,” resulting disconnection, disembodiment, misinterpreting, misunderstanding, miss-ing, absencing, & divisive distance in place of symmetry’s intimacy, replacing Here’s Now

The Acceleration relates with Overlooking + Overlaying, Internally + Externally

aka

Lots of Miss-ing

We could call total extreme polarization “un-mixing” (that is otherwise naturally mixing)

“Total success/total acceptance” versus “total failure/total denial/total rejection”

Rather than anything in between those extreme/polarizing spectrum ends

Which relates with erasing the middle as well as the entire rest of the spectrum except for the extreme polarities/edges

Notice how “all or nothing” style bullshit relates directly with extreme/extremism and polarizing and imbalancing and disproportionality

Rather than pick and choose diversely Based on inspiration and true resonance

It’s interesting how the formal/inorganic version of “role model“ relates with “all or nothing“

As in like positioning, person/people as if you must accept and swallow and follow all of these qualities or you must accept and swallow and follow none of these qualities

“The Lifeless, Lightless, Mawkishly Masquerading As The Makers and Models of The Life, The Light”

So this can relate to a consent and natural inspiration versus inorganic strategy/FORCE kinda thing

…Versus a person/people being formally positioned and promoted as the model of role model/role modeling with the expectation that people disproportionate/exclusively select their qualities that which is positioned as role model, and not from that which is not positioned as role model

Maybe this relates to some of the issues/challenge also is that there is a big difference I think between the individual/people being able to pick and choose qualities that they are compelled and inspired by functioning as like informal “role model”
…