Cilantro
@coriandersoap.bsky.social
I'm in the UK but here is what I think the UK & US should introduce -
- upon being charged with a sexual offence (assault, rape, spiking, voyeurism) the accused should undergo a vasectomy/sterilisation.
- upon being found guilty part of the sentence should be castration.
It's Christian, isn't it?
- upon being charged with a sexual offence (assault, rape, spiking, voyeurism) the accused should undergo a vasectomy/sterilisation.
- upon being found guilty part of the sentence should be castration.
It's Christian, isn't it?
January 29, 2026 at 12:08 AM
I'm in the UK but here is what I think the UK & US should introduce -
- upon being charged with a sexual offence (assault, rape, spiking, voyeurism) the accused should undergo a vasectomy/sterilisation.
- upon being found guilty part of the sentence should be castration.
It's Christian, isn't it?
- upon being charged with a sexual offence (assault, rape, spiking, voyeurism) the accused should undergo a vasectomy/sterilisation.
- upon being found guilty part of the sentence should be castration.
It's Christian, isn't it?
Omg, I hope you have Dan Hodges on block 🤭
January 28, 2026 at 1:35 PM
Omg, I hope you have Dan Hodges on block 🤭
January 28, 2026 at 1:20 PM
Is it?
It makes an electoral pact with Reform less awkward with their donors.
It makes an electoral pact with Reform less awkward with their donors.
January 28, 2026 at 1:15 PM
Is it?
It makes an electoral pact with Reform less awkward with their donors.
It makes an electoral pact with Reform less awkward with their donors.
Imho, that's because they're more concerned with posting short clips to social media.
Conversational flow is no more, unfortunately.
Conversational flow is no more, unfortunately.
January 28, 2026 at 12:42 PM
Imho, that's because they're more concerned with posting short clips to social media.
Conversational flow is no more, unfortunately.
Conversational flow is no more, unfortunately.
I totally agree about 'soft' questions.
A lot of UK political interviewers could do with bingeing "24hrs in Police Custody" on C4.
Catching flies with honey comes to mind.
A lot of UK political interviewers could do with bingeing "24hrs in Police Custody" on C4.
Catching flies with honey comes to mind.
January 28, 2026 at 12:32 PM
I totally agree about 'soft' questions.
A lot of UK political interviewers could do with bingeing "24hrs in Police Custody" on C4.
Catching flies with honey comes to mind.
A lot of UK political interviewers could do with bingeing "24hrs in Police Custody" on C4.
Catching flies with honey comes to mind.
Is it being shown with subtitles in the UK?
January 28, 2026 at 12:16 PM
Is it being shown with subtitles in the UK?
Not really if your donors are signalling that they're expecting a Tory-Reform electoral pact.
January 28, 2026 at 12:08 PM
Not really if your donors are signalling that they're expecting a Tory-Reform electoral pact.
Brave strategy, or a sign it's all complete bullshit & the money men are already "suggesting" minimal policy differences to aid an election pact with Reform?
bsky.app/profile/pete...
bsky.app/profile/pete...
January 28, 2026 at 12:05 PM
Brave strategy, or a sign it's all complete bullshit & the money men are already "suggesting" minimal policy differences to aid an election pact with Reform?
bsky.app/profile/pete...
bsky.app/profile/pete...
No, coz when her kids have a tantrum it's the nanny who has to deal with it.
January 28, 2026 at 11:48 AM
No, coz when her kids have a tantrum it's the nanny who has to deal with it.
I didn't suggest it was.
I just found it interesting that yesterday's article that was all about the "big beast" Suella defecting to Reform has been updated today into an entirely different article that is Farage forward and now contains no mention of how long Mason has known Braverman.
That's all.
I just found it interesting that yesterday's article that was all about the "big beast" Suella defecting to Reform has been updated today into an entirely different article that is Farage forward and now contains no mention of how long Mason has known Braverman.
That's all.
January 27, 2026 at 11:20 PM
I didn't suggest it was.
I just found it interesting that yesterday's article that was all about the "big beast" Suella defecting to Reform has been updated today into an entirely different article that is Farage forward and now contains no mention of how long Mason has known Braverman.
That's all.
I just found it interesting that yesterday's article that was all about the "big beast" Suella defecting to Reform has been updated today into an entirely different article that is Farage forward and now contains no mention of how long Mason has known Braverman.
That's all.
"Angela says", or a senior Labour "source" wishes that's what she'd say?
January 27, 2026 at 10:04 PM
"Angela says", or a senior Labour "source" wishes that's what she'd say?
Or as my dad used to say, "Oh, you know, we're starving in comfort".
January 27, 2026 at 9:25 PM
Or as my dad used to say, "Oh, you know, we're starving in comfort".
Very different slant now.
www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...
www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...
Chris Mason: Both Tories and Labour feel the Reform heebie-jeebies
Both of Westminster's mega brands, Labour and the Conservatives, are feeling discombobulated, the BBC's political editor writes.
www.bbc.co.uk
January 27, 2026 at 8:31 PM
Very different slant now.
www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...
www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...
Not anymore he hasn't.
The article has been "updated" today.
New headline, new article, lots of Burnham and no mention of him knowing Suella for 25 years.
Interesting, eh?
The article has been "updated" today.
New headline, new article, lots of Burnham and no mention of him knowing Suella for 25 years.
Interesting, eh?
January 27, 2026 at 8:29 PM
Not anymore he hasn't.
The article has been "updated" today.
New headline, new article, lots of Burnham and no mention of him knowing Suella for 25 years.
Interesting, eh?
The article has been "updated" today.
New headline, new article, lots of Burnham and no mention of him knowing Suella for 25 years.
Interesting, eh?
Well, the article has been updated today. New headline, new article, lots of Andy Burnham and no mention of Mason knowing her for 25 years.
I wonder who suggested that was removed?🙄
I wonder who suggested that was removed?🙄
January 27, 2026 at 8:25 PM
Well, the article has been updated today. New headline, new article, lots of Andy Burnham and no mention of Mason knowing her for 25 years.
I wonder who suggested that was removed?🙄
I wonder who suggested that was removed?🙄
Not anymore he doesn't!!!!
The article has been updated today and all mention of his long relationship with Braverman is gone.
I was going to quote from it and when I went to check....new headline & new article full of gossip about Burnham.
Gibb was obviously displeased.
The article has been updated today and all mention of his long relationship with Braverman is gone.
I was going to quote from it and when I went to check....new headline & new article full of gossip about Burnham.
Gibb was obviously displeased.
January 27, 2026 at 8:21 PM
Not anymore he doesn't!!!!
The article has been updated today and all mention of his long relationship with Braverman is gone.
I was going to quote from it and when I went to check....new headline & new article full of gossip about Burnham.
Gibb was obviously displeased.
The article has been updated today and all mention of his long relationship with Braverman is gone.
I was going to quote from it and when I went to check....new headline & new article full of gossip about Burnham.
Gibb was obviously displeased.
But weren't you struck by how "unbiased" he was about the whole thing? 🙄
January 26, 2026 at 7:42 PM
But weren't you struck by how "unbiased" he was about the whole thing? 🙄
But don't forget, she never makes gaffes.
January 26, 2026 at 7:18 PM
But don't forget, she never makes gaffes.