Cromby
@cromby620.bsky.social
Établissons un filtre comportemental constitutionnel pour empêcher les individus à haut risque ou non humains d’accéder au pouvoir.
Why do we elect toxic representatives with personality disorders?
Because they are eligible.
We need a constitutional and institutional shield to prevent the risk of leaders with Antisocial Personality Disorder (APD) or Paranoid Personality Disorder (PPD).
Because they are eligible.
We need a constitutional and institutional shield to prevent the risk of leaders with Antisocial Personality Disorder (APD) or Paranoid Personality Disorder (PPD).
February 8, 2026 at 9:35 PM
Why do we elect toxic representatives with personality disorders?
Because they are eligible.
We need a constitutional and institutional shield to prevent the risk of leaders with Antisocial Personality Disorder (APD) or Paranoid Personality Disorder (PPD).
Because they are eligible.
We need a constitutional and institutional shield to prevent the risk of leaders with Antisocial Personality Disorder (APD) or Paranoid Personality Disorder (PPD).
Warum wählen wir toxische Vertreter mit Persönlichkeitsstörungen?
Weil sie wählbar sind.
Wir brauchen einen verfassungsrechtlichen und institutionellen Schutzschild, um das Risiko von Führungskräften mit antisozialer (APS) oder paranoider (PPS) Persönlichkeitsstörung zu vermeiden.
Weil sie wählbar sind.
Wir brauchen einen verfassungsrechtlichen und institutionellen Schutzschild, um das Risiko von Führungskräften mit antisozialer (APS) oder paranoider (PPS) Persönlichkeitsstörung zu vermeiden.
February 8, 2026 at 8:57 PM
Warum wählen wir toxische Vertreter mit Persönlichkeitsstörungen?
Weil sie wählbar sind.
Wir brauchen einen verfassungsrechtlichen und institutionellen Schutzschild, um das Risiko von Führungskräften mit antisozialer (APS) oder paranoider (PPS) Persönlichkeitsstörung zu vermeiden.
Weil sie wählbar sind.
Wir brauchen einen verfassungsrechtlichen und institutionellen Schutzschild, um das Risiko von Führungskräften mit antisozialer (APS) oder paranoider (PPS) Persönlichkeitsstörung zu vermeiden.
Yes... and why dœsn't he push for protecting the Ukrainian sky ?
#SkyShield
#SkyShield
February 8, 2026 at 8:48 PM
Yes... and why dœsn't he push for protecting the Ukrainian sky ?
#SkyShield
#SkyShield
No surprise there.
They tried for a decade before even his first presidential election.
Fake news was already rife about him in 2016.
They tried for a decade before even his first presidential election.
Fake news was already rife about him in 2016.
February 6, 2026 at 10:15 PM
No surprise there.
They tried for a decade before even his first presidential election.
Fake news was already rife about him in 2016.
They tried for a decade before even his first presidential election.
Fake news was already rife about him in 2016.
No surprise there.
They tried for a decade before even his first presidential election.
Fake news was already rife about him in 2016.
They tried for a decade before even his first presidential election.
Fake news was already rife about him in 2016.
February 6, 2026 at 10:15 PM
No surprise there.
They tried for a decade before even his first presidential election.
Fake news was already rife about him in 2016.
They tried for a decade before even his first presidential election.
Fake news was already rife about him in 2016.
No surprise there.
They tried for a decade before even his first presidential election.
Fake news was already rife about him in 2016.
They tried for a decade before even his first presidential election.
Fake news was already rife about him in 2016.
February 6, 2026 at 10:14 PM
No surprise there.
They tried for a decade before even his first presidential election.
Fake news was already rife about him in 2016.
They tried for a decade before even his first presidential election.
Fake news was already rife about him in 2016.
No surprise there.
They tried for a decade before even his first presidential election.
Fake news was already rife about him in 2016.
They tried for a decade before even his first presidential election.
Fake news was already rife about him in 2016.
February 6, 2026 at 10:14 PM
No surprise there.
They tried for a decade before even his first presidential election.
Fake news was already rife about him in 2016.
They tried for a decade before even his first presidential election.
Fake news was already rife about him in 2016.
No surprise there.
They tried for a decade before even his first presidential election.
Fake news was already rife about him in 2016.
They tried for a decade before even his first presidential election.
Fake news was already rife about him in 2016.
February 6, 2026 at 10:13 PM
No surprise there.
They tried for a decade before even his first presidential election.
Fake news was already rife about him in 2016.
They tried for a decade before even his first presidential election.
Fake news was already rife about him in 2016.
No surprise there.
They tried for a decade before even his first presidential election.
Fake news was already rife about him in 2016.
They tried for a decade before even his first presidential election.
Fake news was already rife about him in 2016.
February 6, 2026 at 10:13 PM
No surprise there.
They tried for a decade before even his first presidential election.
Fake news was already rife about him in 2016.
They tried for a decade before even his first presidential election.
Fake news was already rife about him in 2016.
No surprise there.
They tried for a decade before even his first presidential election.
Fake news was already rife about him in 2016.
They tried for a decade before even his first presidential election.
Fake news was already rife about him in 2016.
February 6, 2026 at 10:12 PM
No surprise there.
They tried for a decade before even his first presidential election.
Fake news was already rife about him in 2016.
They tried for a decade before even his first presidential election.
Fake news was already rife about him in 2016.
No surprise there.
They tried for a decade before even his first presidential election.
Fake news was already rife about him in 2016.
They tried for a decade before even his first presidential election.
Fake news was already rife about him in 2016.
February 6, 2026 at 10:12 PM
No surprise there.
They tried for a decade before even his first presidential election.
Fake news was already rife about him in 2016.
They tried for a decade before even his first presidential election.
Fake news was already rife about him in 2016.
No surprise there.
They tried for a decade before even his first presidential election.
Fake news was already rife about him in 2016.
They tried for a decade before even his first presidential election.
Fake news was already rife about him in 2016.
February 6, 2026 at 10:11 PM
No surprise there.
They tried for a decade before even his first presidential election.
Fake news was already rife about him in 2016.
They tried for a decade before even his first presidential election.
Fake news was already rife about him in 2016.
No surprise there.
They tried for a decade before even his first presidential election.
Fake news was already rife about him in 2016.
They tried for a decade before even his first presidential election.
Fake news was already rife about him in 2016.
February 6, 2026 at 10:11 PM
No surprise there.
They tried for a decade before even his first presidential election.
Fake news was already rife about him in 2016.
They tried for a decade before even his first presidential election.
Fake news was already rife about him in 2016.
No surprise there.
They tried for a decade before even his first presidential election.
Fake news was already rife about him in 2016.
They tried for a decade before even his first presidential election.
Fake news was already rife about him in 2016.
February 6, 2026 at 10:10 PM
No surprise there.
They tried for a decade before even his first presidential election.
Fake news was already rife about him in 2016.
They tried for a decade before even his first presidential election.
Fake news was already rife about him in 2016.
Point central :
La durabilité passe par des garde-fous constitutionnels empêchant l’accès au pouvoir de profils toxiques, quelle que soit l’institution.
Sans protections structurelles, l’émergence de nouveaux tyrans reste inévitable.
La durabilité passe par des garde-fous constitutionnels empêchant l’accès au pouvoir de profils toxiques, quelle que soit l’institution.
Sans protections structurelles, l’émergence de nouveaux tyrans reste inévitable.
January 12, 2026 at 12:24 AM
Point central :
La durabilité passe par des garde-fous constitutionnels empêchant l’accès au pouvoir de profils toxiques, quelle que soit l’institution.
Sans protections structurelles, l’émergence de nouveaux tyrans reste inévitable.
La durabilité passe par des garde-fous constitutionnels empêchant l’accès au pouvoir de profils toxiques, quelle que soit l’institution.
Sans protections structurelles, l’émergence de nouveaux tyrans reste inévitable.
Point central :
La durabilité passe par des garde-fous constitutionnels empêchant l’accès au pouvoir de profils toxiques, quelle que soit l’institution.
Sans protections structurelles, l’émergence de nouveaux tyrans reste inévitable.
La durabilité passe par des garde-fous constitutionnels empêchant l’accès au pouvoir de profils toxiques, quelle que soit l’institution.
Sans protections structurelles, l’émergence de nouveaux tyrans reste inévitable.
January 12, 2026 at 12:22 AM
Point central :
La durabilité passe par des garde-fous constitutionnels empêchant l’accès au pouvoir de profils toxiques, quelle que soit l’institution.
Sans protections structurelles, l’émergence de nouveaux tyrans reste inévitable.
La durabilité passe par des garde-fous constitutionnels empêchant l’accès au pouvoir de profils toxiques, quelle que soit l’institution.
Sans protections structurelles, l’émergence de nouveaux tyrans reste inévitable.
Voici aussi pertinent puisqu'on parle de platistes.
January 2, 2026 at 6:40 PM
Voici aussi pertinent puisqu'on parle de platistes.