I'm still immensely apprehensive about what a national election is gonna look like under this admin. Still don't know if we're prepared for how bad this could go.

🪡

🪡

🪡

🪡

also worth noting that progress is what happens after resistance, means formalizing & materializing gains of resistance as law. romanticizing the law breaking means adopting a false perspective on what law breaking is, how laws can institutionalize protections heretofore already gained.

Would the Court have to address whether 14A § 5 amends no bills of attainder cl. or would Congress invalidating a Pres. not run afoul of this protection?

As someone who thinks he is a Section 3 Pres. within a plain & historic understanding of 14A, I'm not sure any of this legally happens without some form of court order issued during his assumption of powers of the Office

This is not the holding in Trump v. Anderson; it does not rubber stamp the election results