Trekken personen met een gebrek aan actieve herinneringen elkaar aan, of is het besmettelijk?

Ze mag daar best op aangesproken worden wat betreft haar verleden als minister van Veiligheid en Justitie.

It could help a new audience discover you. I say keep it enabled

Even though I prefer translated subtitles when watching video in another language, I don't fault the channel for having it enabled. I think it's on YouTube to prompt the user to set their preference.

The first most important liquid being tears

Never click on links you don't trust… It could be a hyrus.

This competitive spiritual debate is so tiring. Jeanne d'Arc's story is full of it too. It's just who can stick the same argument the hardest: "who do you think you are, interpreting the word of God?"
"No, *you* are interpreting the word of God."
"No, YOU!"

I'm certain that Jesus would have let that woman be stoned if the authorities judged it so.

Jesus' solution was to dodge that question (judgment wasn't up to him anyway), and parry it with his famous command. Now the Pharisees were cornered and weren't able to recover from this rhetorical check mate.

So they thought they had Jesus cornered. They thought that they had forced him to call for a stoning. Because a pious, spiritual leader, as Jesus fashioned himself, ought not to think of themselves as above the scripture—God's word.

What's relevant and interesting, is that those authorities, the Pharisees, were at odds with Jesus and his followers. I think they viewed him as a rebel who challenged their rule. So the act of bringing the suspect in front of Jesus might have been a rhetorical sleight of hand on their part.

According to them, that person had to be stoned, as was written in scripture. They asked Jesus, who was at the temple too, about his judgment in this case.

After examining the passage, I admit I was wrong. There wasn't a mob preparing a stoning after all, though there may have been one present. In the story, the spritual authorities had just brought in someone who was caught in the act of adultery.

If anything, bystanders would have joined in on the stoning just to stick it to the wokes.

It worked!

· A cast of meteorologists
· An omen of economists
· A colony of entomologists
· A pedigree of genealogists
· A consent of sexologists