Cyborg Tibe
@cybrogtribe.bsky.social
The only human things that can thrive in a world of AIs are cyborgs.
Wait. Cocaine again? I’m am so sad-excited. Links?
January 9, 2026 at 1:53 AM
Wait. Cocaine again? I’m am so sad-excited. Links?
Like, maybe he has a point when he says bsky is too mean to him.
But then 200% undermines the whole argument when he cherry picks an only probably true thing to virtue-post and then try to use it as exhibit A.
But then 200% undermines the whole argument when he cherry picks an only probably true thing to virtue-post and then try to use it as exhibit A.
December 27, 2025 at 3:11 AM
Like, maybe he has a point when he says bsky is too mean to him.
But then 200% undermines the whole argument when he cherry picks an only probably true thing to virtue-post and then try to use it as exhibit A.
But then 200% undermines the whole argument when he cherry picks an only probably true thing to virtue-post and then try to use it as exhibit A.
“this isn't a crisis in teaching; it's an attack on learning”
…
Are we done? Can you admit you were wrong? I never said it was the only problem with teaching. They said the fact that LLMs act like smart students wasn’t a crisis for teaching. They are very clearly wrong.
…
Are we done? Can you admit you were wrong? I never said it was the only problem with teaching. They said the fact that LLMs act like smart students wasn’t a crisis for teaching. They are very clearly wrong.
December 27, 2025 at 2:53 AM
“this isn't a crisis in teaching; it's an attack on learning”
…
Are we done? Can you admit you were wrong? I never said it was the only problem with teaching. They said the fact that LLMs act like smart students wasn’t a crisis for teaching. They are very clearly wrong.
…
Are we done? Can you admit you were wrong? I never said it was the only problem with teaching. They said the fact that LLMs act like smart students wasn’t a crisis for teaching. They are very clearly wrong.
I never said it was the only one. You attributed that to me to try and argue against some point I didn’t make to try and think you were still winning the argument. That’s cold, but it is true.
December 27, 2025 at 2:45 AM
I never said it was the only one. You attributed that to me to try and argue against some point I didn’t make to try and think you were still winning the argument. That’s cold, but it is true.
The fact that it is hard, using traditional education methods, to differentiate between a good student and a good LLM is one they simply ignore.
There is a crisis in education and the future of good education will be one that fully embraces some form of AI. The other options are impossible.
There is a crisis in education and the future of good education will be one that fully embraces some form of AI. The other options are impossible.
December 27, 2025 at 2:44 AM
The fact that it is hard, using traditional education methods, to differentiate between a good student and a good LLM is one they simply ignore.
There is a crisis in education and the future of good education will be one that fully embraces some form of AI. The other options are impossible.
There is a crisis in education and the future of good education will be one that fully embraces some form of AI. The other options are impossible.
That’s a big backslide. I agree there are many problem with education. Poor funding is one they point out. People trying to sell AI quick fixes is another they point out. I agree with both.
…
…
December 27, 2025 at 2:42 AM
That’s a big backslide. I agree there are many problem with education. Poor funding is one they point out. People trying to sell AI quick fixes is another they point out. I agree with both.
…
…
I did read the article and I am not lying.
That sentence is a cop out for absolutist language everywhere else. But even if you really want to play stupid games, then I offer a “more full” diagnosis.
That sentence is a cop out for absolutist language everywhere else. But even if you really want to play stupid games, then I offer a “more full” diagnosis.
December 27, 2025 at 2:30 AM
I did read the article and I am not lying.
That sentence is a cop out for absolutist language everywhere else. But even if you really want to play stupid games, then I offer a “more full” diagnosis.
That sentence is a cop out for absolutist language everywhere else. But even if you really want to play stupid games, then I offer a “more full” diagnosis.
Exactly. That’s OPs point I’m quoting there. They say there is “No” crisis in education. It is an absurd absolutist argument, which is obviously on its face wrong. There is a crisis in how we think about education. We need a solution. I even like one of their solutions!
December 27, 2025 at 2:21 AM
Exactly. That’s OPs point I’m quoting there. They say there is “No” crisis in education. It is an absurd absolutist argument, which is obviously on its face wrong. There is a crisis in how we think about education. We need a solution. I even like one of their solutions!
Or non commercial ones. It is a permissive license with almost restrictions. Such bad faith. Give me an honest, not bs I-think-I’ve-got-you answer to bsky.app/profile/cybr...
Then there wouldn’t be any real commercial incentive, and so the assault should just simply stop then right?
If a non-commercial use of LLMs is also a threat, then perhaps there is really an underlying crisis we will have to deal with. How to teach in a world where everyone has an LLM?
If a non-commercial use of LLMs is also a threat, then perhaps there is really an underlying crisis we will have to deal with. How to teach in a world where everyone has an LLM?
December 27, 2025 at 2:18 AM
Or non commercial ones. It is a permissive license with almost restrictions. Such bad faith. Give me an honest, not bs I-think-I’ve-got-you answer to bsky.app/profile/cybr...
This is another bad faith attempt. I’m not attempting to make any fine pointed argument here. We are still, very slowly, walking back to any attempt to provide an answer for this.
bsky.app/profile/cybr...
bsky.app/profile/cybr...
Then there wouldn’t be any real commercial incentive, and so the assault should just simply stop then right?
If a non-commercial use of LLMs is also a threat, then perhaps there is really an underlying crisis we will have to deal with. How to teach in a world where everyone has an LLM?
If a non-commercial use of LLMs is also a threat, then perhaps there is really an underlying crisis we will have to deal with. How to teach in a world where everyone has an LLM?
December 27, 2025 at 2:14 AM
This is another bad faith attempt. I’m not attempting to make any fine pointed argument here. We are still, very slowly, walking back to any attempt to provide an answer for this.
bsky.app/profile/cybr...
bsky.app/profile/cybr...
Sure. And source.
December 27, 2025 at 2:13 AM
Sure. And source.
Which assertions? That was a direct quote from them that misused the word “commercial” the you chimed in with ‘the definition of words matter’, which the commenter is not very good at.
December 27, 2025 at 2:13 AM
Which assertions? That was a direct quote from them that misused the word “commercial” the you chimed in with ‘the definition of words matter’, which the commenter is not very good at.
Open weights and open training set. My whole contention was if it was AT ALL possible that this could be used for education. Everything after that was evasion on their part.
December 27, 2025 at 2:10 AM
Open weights and open training set. My whole contention was if it was AT ALL possible that this could be used for education. Everything after that was evasion on their part.
Sure. Let’s go with MIT license
December 27, 2025 at 2:09 AM
Sure. Let’s go with MIT license
Great, so then when they posted “Yes. And the industry — the entire commercial industry — is not just a for-sale product.”
Do you believe they did not understand the definition of “commercial”? It states that there is a definition of commercial other than commerce, aka the sale of products.
Do you believe they did not understand the definition of “commercial”? It states that there is a definition of commercial other than commerce, aka the sale of products.
December 27, 2025 at 2:07 AM
Great, so then when they posted “Yes. And the industry — the entire commercial industry — is not just a for-sale product.”
Do you believe they did not understand the definition of “commercial”? It states that there is a definition of commercial other than commerce, aka the sale of products.
Do you believe they did not understand the definition of “commercial”? It states that there is a definition of commercial other than commerce, aka the sale of products.
lol! She literally didn’t answer multiple simple questions! Would you like to try?
Can an open source LLM be used in a non commercial way?
Can an open source LLM be used in a non commercial way?
December 27, 2025 at 2:03 AM
lol! She literally didn’t answer multiple simple questions! Would you like to try?
Can an open source LLM be used in a non commercial way?
Can an open source LLM be used in a non commercial way?
Great. Define “commercial”. I didn’t go down the pedantry with them, but if it is just us jamokes now, let’s roll.
December 27, 2025 at 1:55 AM
Great. Define “commercial”. I didn’t go down the pedantry with them, but if it is just us jamokes now, let’s roll.
You have now refused to answer 2 different simple questions 3 different times. This is a quote from the article you should take to heart.
December 27, 2025 at 1:44 AM
You have now refused to answer 2 different simple questions 3 different times. This is a quote from the article you should take to heart.
At this point, do you realize you are arguing in bad faith or just kind of slipped into it?
The answer to that question would either be absurd or demonstrate that obviously an open source LLM can in fact be used in a non commercial way.
If I’m wrong, simply answer the question asked.
The answer to that question would either be absurd or demonstrate that obviously an open source LLM can in fact be used in a non commercial way.
If I’m wrong, simply answer the question asked.
December 27, 2025 at 1:39 AM
At this point, do you realize you are arguing in bad faith or just kind of slipped into it?
The answer to that question would either be absurd or demonstrate that obviously an open source LLM can in fact be used in a non commercial way.
If I’m wrong, simply answer the question asked.
The answer to that question would either be absurd or demonstrate that obviously an open source LLM can in fact be used in a non commercial way.
If I’m wrong, simply answer the question asked.
So, any act that involves any object produced by a commercial organization is commercial? Or can some of them be used for non-commercial purposes?
December 27, 2025 at 1:28 AM
So, any act that involves any object produced by a commercial organization is commercial? Or can some of them be used for non-commercial purposes?
Mighty pedantic, but ok, could such a system be used in a non-commercial way?
December 27, 2025 at 1:23 AM
Mighty pedantic, but ok, could such a system be used in a non-commercial way?
The article has 2 or 3 interesting points buried in a bunch of nonsense. I’m not sure what to do when people who believe they provide education are the ones most in need of it. This is a screenshot of a highlighted quote from the article.
December 27, 2025 at 1:21 AM
The article has 2 or 3 interesting points buried in a bunch of nonsense. I’m not sure what to do when people who believe they provide education are the ones most in need of it. This is a screenshot of a highlighted quote from the article.
Well, can we at least agree that an “open source” LLM, that you can procure without money, and change as you personally wish, is “non-commercial”?
December 27, 2025 at 1:12 AM
Well, can we at least agree that an “open source” LLM, that you can procure without money, and change as you personally wish, is “non-commercial”?
As some one who read a lot of primary papers and thought “brevity is the soul of wit”, I’ve felt challenged by a recent framing of ‘reading isn’t just about getting information, but also about forcing your brain to spend time on a subject’
I still have a job and kids, so 0 books in 2025 😬
I still have a job and kids, so 0 books in 2025 😬
December 26, 2025 at 11:54 PM
As some one who read a lot of primary papers and thought “brevity is the soul of wit”, I’ve felt challenged by a recent framing of ‘reading isn’t just about getting information, but also about forcing your brain to spend time on a subject’
I still have a job and kids, so 0 books in 2025 😬
I still have a job and kids, so 0 books in 2025 😬