Paul Fuxjäger
@cypherhippie.bsky.social
Worked in academia for a while, mostly on interference mitigation in open communication systems.
Now it's time for some more hands-on action.
Main account on ActivityPub/Mastodon:
https://chaos.social/@cypherhippie
Now it's time for some more hands-on action.
Main account on ActivityPub/Mastodon:
https://chaos.social/@cypherhippie
Hey there, I‘d love to join in-person too 🤓
I’m actively working on openscience use cases and very passionate about AT-AP interop (and PLC federation).
Recent talk at #fediday:
c-tube.c-base.org/w/tC8oNNjFNr...
Thx to @bnewbold.net and @tgoerke.bsky.social for the hint.
My reg is pending 👉👈
I’m actively working on openscience use cases and very passionate about AT-AP interop (and PLC federation).
Recent talk at #fediday:
c-tube.c-base.org/w/tC8oNNjFNr...
Thx to @bnewbold.net and @tgoerke.bsky.social for the hint.
My reg is pending 👉👈
#fediday2025 Paul Fuxjäger - Protocol Convergence within Open Science Communication Networks
Protocol Convergence within Open Science Communication Networks (EN) Paul Fuxjäger, Uni Wien Paul Fuxjäger (@cypherhippie|chaos.social) forscht in der Research Group Cooperative Systems mit Fokus a...
c-tube.c-base.org
November 5, 2025 at 10:29 AM
Hey there, I‘d love to join in-person too 🤓
I’m actively working on openscience use cases and very passionate about AT-AP interop (and PLC federation).
Recent talk at #fediday:
c-tube.c-base.org/w/tC8oNNjFNr...
Thx to @bnewbold.net and @tgoerke.bsky.social for the hint.
My reg is pending 👉👈
I’m actively working on openscience use cases and very passionate about AT-AP interop (and PLC federation).
Recent talk at #fediday:
c-tube.c-base.org/w/tC8oNNjFNr...
Thx to @bnewbold.net and @tgoerke.bsky.social for the hint.
My reg is pending 👉👈
Reposted by Paul Fuxjäger
The only consistent thing about decentralization, since I started in 2012, has been this:
nobody agrees on the definition
nobody agrees on the definition
October 16, 2025 at 11:36 PM
The only consistent thing about decentralization, since I started in 2012, has been this:
nobody agrees on the definition
nobody agrees on the definition
Thanks for publicly sharing, this is awesome! 🤩
Are there plans for next meetup?
—
FYI: I did a 15min talk on open sci comms at #fediday in Berlin:
c-tube.c-base.org/w/tC8oNNjFNr...
(Tried to call for AP-AT interoperability around 3 basic claims)
I’d love to hear your thoughts and join forces.
Are there plans for next meetup?
—
FYI: I did a 15min talk on open sci comms at #fediday in Berlin:
c-tube.c-base.org/w/tC8oNNjFNr...
(Tried to call for AP-AT interoperability around 3 basic claims)
I’d love to hear your thoughts and join forces.
#fediday2025 Paul Fuxjäger - Protocol Convergence within Open Science Communication Networks
Protocol Convergence within Open Science Communication Networks (EN) Paul Fuxjäger, Uni Wien Paul Fuxjäger (@cypherhippie|chaos.social) forscht in der Research Group Cooperative Systems mit Fokus a...
c-tube.c-base.org
October 14, 2025 at 9:06 AM
Thanks for publicly sharing, this is awesome! 🤩
Are there plans for next meetup?
—
FYI: I did a 15min talk on open sci comms at #fediday in Berlin:
c-tube.c-base.org/w/tC8oNNjFNr...
(Tried to call for AP-AT interoperability around 3 basic claims)
I’d love to hear your thoughts and join forces.
Are there plans for next meetup?
—
FYI: I did a 15min talk on open sci comms at #fediday in Berlin:
c-tube.c-base.org/w/tC8oNNjFNr...
(Tried to call for AP-AT interoperability around 3 basic claims)
I’d love to hear your thoughts and join forces.
Reposted by Paul Fuxjäger
The thing that still pisses me off about dark forest theory is that it is predicated on the inability to coordinate, and you know say have a society.
October 12, 2025 at 3:19 AM
The thing that still pisses me off about dark forest theory is that it is predicated on the inability to coordinate, and you know say have a society.
I’d bet many are (like us) dreaming of ethical ad markets for years?
But I currently believe their emergence ALSO needs UI paradigm shift: the way we are asked to look at them must ‘feel’ different. More Respectful?
Eg: Want to introduce new kind of tax? Offer ‘more direct mandate’ on their use :)
But I currently believe their emergence ALSO needs UI paradigm shift: the way we are asked to look at them must ‘feel’ different. More Respectful?
Eg: Want to introduce new kind of tax? Offer ‘more direct mandate’ on their use :)
September 24, 2025 at 4:28 PM
I’d bet many are (like us) dreaming of ethical ad markets for years?
But I currently believe their emergence ALSO needs UI paradigm shift: the way we are asked to look at them must ‘feel’ different. More Respectful?
Eg: Want to introduce new kind of tax? Offer ‘more direct mandate’ on their use :)
But I currently believe their emergence ALSO needs UI paradigm shift: the way we are asked to look at them must ‘feel’ different. More Respectful?
Eg: Want to introduce new kind of tax? Offer ‘more direct mandate’ on their use :)
Is the claim ‘Establishing an Ethical Ad Market hasn’t been tried before’?
IMO ads are based on limiting agency, without official ‘make ad vanish by donating’ buttons I cannot imagine it.
But biggest obstacle seems to me the general anti-ad ethics within WP communities.
IMO ads are based on limiting agency, without official ‘make ad vanish by donating’ buttons I cannot imagine it.
But biggest obstacle seems to me the general anti-ad ethics within WP communities.
September 24, 2025 at 12:03 PM
Is the claim ‘Establishing an Ethical Ad Market hasn’t been tried before’?
IMO ads are based on limiting agency, without official ‘make ad vanish by donating’ buttons I cannot imagine it.
But biggest obstacle seems to me the general anti-ad ethics within WP communities.
IMO ads are based on limiting agency, without official ‘make ad vanish by donating’ buttons I cannot imagine it.
But biggest obstacle seems to me the general anti-ad ethics within WP communities.
Fondly remember how enticing it felt to me when my fav iOS podcatcher had flattr integration.
Automated microfunding = no cognitive buying decision problem.
Ask @tim.pritlove.org
IMO, the claim ‘ads are the only micropayment scheme that is known to work at scale‘ should include a big fat ‘,YET’.
Automated microfunding = no cognitive buying decision problem.
Ask @tim.pritlove.org
IMO, the claim ‘ads are the only micropayment scheme that is known to work at scale‘ should include a big fat ‘,YET’.
September 24, 2025 at 8:00 AM
Fondly remember how enticing it felt to me when my fav iOS podcatcher had flattr integration.
Automated microfunding = no cognitive buying decision problem.
Ask @tim.pritlove.org
IMO, the claim ‘ads are the only micropayment scheme that is known to work at scale‘ should include a big fat ‘,YET’.
Automated microfunding = no cognitive buying decision problem.
Ask @tim.pritlove.org
IMO, the claim ‘ads are the only micropayment scheme that is known to work at scale‘ should include a big fat ‘,YET’.
I wonder if @hennavirkkunen.bsky.social is aware that adversarial interoperability is key to tech sovereignty?
And if so, what is her plan to increase the chances of being able to enforce it against the power of giants?
www.eff.org/deeplinks/20...
And if so, what is her plan to increase the chances of being able to enforce it against the power of giants?
www.eff.org/deeplinks/20...
Adversarial Interoperability
“Interoperability” is the act of making a new product or service work with an existing product or service: modern civilization depends on the standards and practices that allow you to put any dish int...
www.eff.org
September 13, 2025 at 7:29 AM
I wonder if @hennavirkkunen.bsky.social is aware that adversarial interoperability is key to tech sovereignty?
And if so, what is her plan to increase the chances of being able to enforce it against the power of giants?
www.eff.org/deeplinks/20...
And if so, what is her plan to increase the chances of being able to enforce it against the power of giants?
www.eff.org/deeplinks/20...
A term that moves focus towards ‘the structural core of the problem’ would be more productive, IMO.
So, what is the structural core of the problem, nowadays?
Loss of connectivity when leaving a ‘closed’ system?
So, what is the structural core of the problem, nowadays?
Loss of connectivity when leaving a ‘closed’ system?
July 22, 2025 at 3:46 PM
A term that moves focus towards ‘the structural core of the problem’ would be more productive, IMO.
So, what is the structural core of the problem, nowadays?
Loss of connectivity when leaving a ‘closed’ system?
So, what is the structural core of the problem, nowadays?
Loss of connectivity when leaving a ‘closed’ system?