My calculations tvartankt.se/Tidskrift/kl...

stromstadakademi.se/FSS/FSS-46.pdf

Still the electricity prize for many users in Sweden varies wildly in a rather unpredictable way, which could be avoided by administrative means, It was misleadingly claimed that these problems should be reduced with the new system.

We worry that China tops clima gas and still invest much in continued coal. Even if China expands more environmental friendly electric generation also. But China is much larger than Germany.

Slightly biased "trend" towards high raise as the most recent hot years get unrepresentative much weight. But the need for more immediate action to counteract is right and as the acceleration of heating up seems high it may anyway be right forecast, I got the same with another analyse method.

I like the organisation and believe it has contributed to a global sustainable forest

Reducing fossil very slow most renewable just for increasing energi production. Does not look promising for a fossil free future!

A reason to reforest is that forest can produce raw materials which can replace fossil.

I suggest Eliot posts the graphic from parisagreementtemperatureindex.com/spiral-of-gl... . It demonstrates the increasing global heating in a better way than I have seen before, and the site deserves more attention.

The climate book covers many subjects affecting the future, including population growth. But "overpopulation", that we are already at least double as many on Earth as sustainable. We will not be able to change that. Thus reduction in nativity should be a prime goal, but it is not.