Dan Hartland
@danhartland.bsky.social
1.7K followers 520 following 1.2K posts
Writes, variously. Reviews Editor, Strange Horizons. Columns at Ancillary Review. Songs over at Bandcamp. Also see @savinglives.bsky.social.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
danhartland.bsky.social
☎️ SH CRITICISM HOTLINE NOW OPEN

In mid-August, thoughts naturally turn to the end of next January: the @strangehorizons.bsky.social Criticism Special.

What spec fic essays, roundtables, interviews, song-and-dance routines have you got for us? Go broad!

⚾️ Pitch us: danwhartland at gmail dot com
danhartland.bsky.social
In the light of this week’s Critical Friends episode, especially struck by how Electra focuses on both The Witch Roads’ scale *and* its concision/economy. Her description of this reminds me of why I still love Steph Swainston work - it’s a tough balance to strike, but so productive.
Critical Friends Episode 16: Length and Breadth
Dan Hartland is joined by Redfern Jon Barrett and Nileena Sunil to discuss those novels that feel too short or not long enough: what's behind that feeling we have that a text is lacking something, …
strangehorizons.com
danhartland.bsky.social
Always happy to carry an Electra Pritchett review - you can rely on her for incisive genre analysis worn enviably lightly.

Case in point, here she is on The Witch Roads by Kate Elliott (@tordotcom.bsky.social): "If epic fantasy is about scale, then Elliott has written the best I’ve read in years."
The Witch Roads by Kate Elliott
The Witch Roads may be Elliott's most concise and economical book yet.
strangehorizons.com
danhartland.bsky.social
In which @casella.bsky.social and I both discuss novels of two halves, and in which Nileena Sunil and @yarntheory.bsky.social both sing the praises of @indrapramitdas.bsky.social.

This would be impressive co-working with @mealofthorns.bsky.social had we done any actual co-working.
danhartland.bsky.social
I'm glad! It's such a rich one that I'm confident we'll return to it in some fashion.
danhartland.bsky.social
Yep yep. I would be extremely keen to return to this topic - novellas specifically - if some useful texts come along. Will keep my eyes peeled.
danhartland.bsky.social
Yeah, that makes a lot of sense. Is there a single paradigm of the novella, though? Like my brief nod to Boccaccio in the episode, I think there are a number of novella-types we might select from literary history. But the 19th-century German version seems to me, too, the most identifiably specific.
Reposted by Dan Hartland
wmhenrymorris.com
1. This is excellent.

2. As @redfernjon.bsky.social points out, marketing categories are blurry & often arbitrary

3. This is esp. true of SF&F where many of the works labeled as novellas are short novels but aren’t marketed as such

4. More SF&F writers should learn to write actual novellas
danhartland.bsky.social
📣 NEW CRITICAL FRIENDS!

In a new ep of the @strangehorizons.bsky.social SFF criticism podcast, I talk with @redfernjon.bsky.social and Nileena Sunil about books that might be longer, and others that could be shorter.

How to read a text that offers too little, or too much, stuff? Some ideas.
Critical Friends Episode 16: Length and Breadth
Dan Hartland is joined by Redfern Jon Barrett and Nileena Sunil to discuss those novels that feel too sure or not long enough: what's behind that feeling we have that a text is lacking something, o…
strangehorizons.com
danhartland.bsky.social
Are we talking about needing more SFFnal Sorrows of Young Werther? Because I think you might be talking about needing more SFFnal Sorrows of Young Werther.
danhartland.bsky.social
Having now listened to the latest AMoT, I note that both @casella.bsky.social and I spend some time of our respective episodes talking about novels of two halves. Zeitgeists are so uncanny.

(I’d love to say we plan this stuff. We do not plan this stuff.)
danhartland.bsky.social
Yes. I should probably have asked Redfern to talk more about the pressures of the market on authors, but it didn’t feel fair.
danhartland.bsky.social
It was a fun discussion! Plenty more to say, of course - as always.
danhartland.bsky.social
You have a point! (You absolutely have a point.)
danhartland.bsky.social
(It is not a real thing. This won’t be the first time you are disappointed in us.)
danhartland.bsky.social
Have you considered taking the Critical Friends Drabble-to-Trilogy Challenge?
danhartland.bsky.social
(S̶o̶r̶r̶y̶ g̶l̶a̶d̶ s̶o̶r̶r̶y̶ glad to hear it!)
danhartland.bsky.social
Oh crumbs.

(A section of our discussion that was cut from the episode focused on another scholar, Judith Leibowitz [in Narrative Purpose in the Novella], who argued for the novella as a genre (!) defined by the “kind of shaping material” it deploys, its “double effect of intensity and expansion.”)
danhartland.bsky.social
Counterpoint: what if a novel is just a novella that is slightly long
danhartland.bsky.social
[email protected] on reading long and short books critically: "You can have breadth and have that work really well. You can have depth and have that work really well. It's not like there's one direction

"I think it’s really when the novel feels dissatisfying based on what it’s trying to do."
danhartland.bsky.social
📣 NEW CRITICAL FRIENDS!

In a new ep of the @strangehorizons.bsky.social SFF criticism podcast, I talk with @redfernjon.bsky.social and Nileena Sunil about books that might be longer, and others that could be shorter.

How to read a text that offers too little, or too much, stuff? Some ideas.
Critical Friends Episode 16: Length and Breadth
Dan Hartland is joined by Redfern Jon Barrett and Nileena Sunil to discuss those novels that feel too sure or not long enough: what's behind that feeling we have that a text is lacking something, o…
strangehorizons.com
danhartland.bsky.social
It was a blast, thank you! Also, we’re all really looking forward to that new novel now, so no pressure.
danhartland.bsky.social
It’s not that we knew you’d need us. But it’s that we knew you’d need us.
danhartland.bsky.social
Paul March-Russell on EJ Swift: "in electing to write against the white noise of voices prophesying doom, Swift’s turn to the utopian is courageous ... [it's] a viable demonstration of how we can meet the greatest challenges that face us as a community."

A review, and a novel, which demands notice.
niallharrison.bsky.social
"When We are Wolves Again is not only the novel we have been waiting for from E. J. Swift, one of the UK’s brightest younger talents in speculative fiction, but the novel we also have been waiting for as readers." Amen to that. strangehorizons.com/wordpress/no...
When There are Wolves Again by E.J. Swift
When There Are Wolves Again is, put simply, the most important, the most courageous, the most uplifting novel I have read in years.
strangehorizons.com
danhartland.bsky.social
Anyway, the strange - ho ho - alignment struck me. What a thing, eh?

By the way, that Battlestar Galactica review? It was bang on, you know: "the Cylons sometimes appear to make little sense." Little did 2005 Dan know. But 2006 Dan would:
Write 'Em Until We Can't: Battlestar Galactica Lays Down Its Burdens
Battlestar Galactica is simultaneously a show compulsively attached to continuity and one with a logic which often doesn't bear the most superficial of inspections.
www.strangehorizons.com