Daniel Ratcliffe-Shutt
@daniel.statement-heritage.com
Historic buildings and landscape archaeologist, working for a living as www.statement-heritage.com . Ruins and their repair, maritime, industrial and agricultural heritage. Aerial photographer. Intertidal deposit.
Historic Scottish slates, oh no, we can’t reuse those…. Just wait while we very carefully stack them in size order on the back of our van…. We’ll be along with some lovely good value Spanish ones in the morning. We’ll leave them with the pallet of non breathable insulation.
December 1, 2025 at 8:45 PM
Historic Scottish slates, oh no, we can’t reuse those…. Just wait while we very carefully stack them in size order on the back of our van…. We’ll be along with some lovely good value Spanish ones in the morning. We’ll leave them with the pallet of non breathable insulation.
They missed 1547 in Somerset. Nobody told them.
November 28, 2025 at 8:10 PM
They missed 1547 in Somerset. Nobody told them.
Time to refer Mr Trump to Arkell vs Pressdram [1971]
November 10, 2025 at 9:56 PM
Time to refer Mr Trump to Arkell vs Pressdram [1971]
A relief to see that subsection 9 provides for any actions relating to the ‘apparatus’
October 22, 2025 at 10:21 PM
A relief to see that subsection 9 provides for any actions relating to the ‘apparatus’
A point eloquently made by Stewart Lee
September 29, 2025 at 12:15 PM
A point eloquently made by Stewart Lee
The Achilles heel of Starmer might just be his faith in public service.
September 27, 2025 at 5:54 PM
The Achilles heel of Starmer might just be his faith in public service.
He claims to oppose it, but do you trust Farage (or whatever horror of the right comes after him) to repeal it, and when they don’t, are you happy with building them that power?
September 27, 2025 at 5:52 PM
He claims to oppose it, but do you trust Farage (or whatever horror of the right comes after him) to repeal it, and when they don’t, are you happy with building them that power?
Can someone lawyerly please explain whether him having immunity form prosecution makes his orders and instructions ‘lawful’ in any way? Because presumably anyone enacting any criminal instructions isn’t covered?
February 13, 2025 at 12:13 AM
Can someone lawyerly please explain whether him having immunity form prosecution makes his orders and instructions ‘lawful’ in any way? Because presumably anyone enacting any criminal instructions isn’t covered?
Pope George Ringo II
February 12, 2025 at 7:21 PM
Pope George Ringo II
Ok, so, presumably this ends with the chiefs of staff removing him? Coz they can’t follow an order that’s nakedly, unapologetically, grotesquely criminal? Then what?
February 5, 2025 at 1:18 AM
Ok, so, presumably this ends with the chiefs of staff removing him? Coz they can’t follow an order that’s nakedly, unapologetically, grotesquely criminal? Then what?