Daniel Rosney
@danielrosney.bsky.social
Freelance TV/ Radio journalist for places like BBC News, ITV News, CBC News, Deutsche Welle, Channel 5 and The Times. Covering UK and Europe. Interested in politics, business, culture, Eurovision and royals.
Reposted by Daniel Rosney
But that’s not the only scandal to hit the Luxembourg monarchy during Grand Duke Henri’s reign
To find out more listen and subscribe to my podcast It’s Reigning Men now, with another episode coming this weekend
podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/i...
To find out more listen and subscribe to my podcast It’s Reigning Men now, with another episode coming this weekend
podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/i...
February 14, 2025 at 7:19 PM
But that’s not the only scandal to hit the Luxembourg monarchy during Grand Duke Henri’s reign
To find out more listen and subscribe to my podcast It’s Reigning Men now, with another episode coming this weekend
podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/i...
To find out more listen and subscribe to my podcast It’s Reigning Men now, with another episode coming this weekend
podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/i...
Reposted by Daniel Rosney
In both the Belgian and Dutch cases a solution was found
But in Luxembourg the Grand Duke’s refusal to sign the bill was causing a constitutional crisis and officials were concerned he could try to prevent future laws
So, they changed the constitution to strip him of that power
But in Luxembourg the Grand Duke’s refusal to sign the bill was causing a constitutional crisis and officials were concerned he could try to prevent future laws
So, they changed the constitution to strip him of that power
February 14, 2025 at 7:19 PM
In both the Belgian and Dutch cases a solution was found
But in Luxembourg the Grand Duke’s refusal to sign the bill was causing a constitutional crisis and officials were concerned he could try to prevent future laws
So, they changed the constitution to strip him of that power
But in Luxembourg the Grand Duke’s refusal to sign the bill was causing a constitutional crisis and officials were concerned he could try to prevent future laws
So, they changed the constitution to strip him of that power
Reposted by Daniel Rosney
🇳🇱 Shortly after the end of World War II, The Netherlands had a “conscientious objector” of its own with its monarch at the time
Queen Juliana in 1951 and 1952 refused to sign the death warrants of four Nazis known as the Breda Four
Instead they were sentenced to life in prison
Queen Juliana in 1951 and 1952 refused to sign the death warrants of four Nazis known as the Breda Four
Instead they were sentenced to life in prison
February 14, 2025 at 7:19 PM
🇳🇱 Shortly after the end of World War II, The Netherlands had a “conscientious objector” of its own with its monarch at the time
Queen Juliana in 1951 and 1952 refused to sign the death warrants of four Nazis known as the Breda Four
Instead they were sentenced to life in prison
Queen Juliana in 1951 and 1952 refused to sign the death warrants of four Nazis known as the Breda Four
Instead they were sentenced to life in prison
Reposted by Daniel Rosney
The work around?
King Baudouin of the Belgians asked the government to declare him unfit to rule for 24 hours
The constitution stated if the king was unfit to rule the government assumed the role of head of state
So, for one day Belgium had no monarch and the bill was signed
King Baudouin of the Belgians asked the government to declare him unfit to rule for 24 hours
The constitution stated if the king was unfit to rule the government assumed the role of head of state
So, for one day Belgium had no monarch and the bill was signed
February 14, 2025 at 7:19 PM
The work around?
King Baudouin of the Belgians asked the government to declare him unfit to rule for 24 hours
The constitution stated if the king was unfit to rule the government assumed the role of head of state
So, for one day Belgium had no monarch and the bill was signed
King Baudouin of the Belgians asked the government to declare him unfit to rule for 24 hours
The constitution stated if the king was unfit to rule the government assumed the role of head of state
So, for one day Belgium had no monarch and the bill was signed
Reposted by Daniel Rosney
🇧🇪 There was precedent for this in neighbouring Belgium where officials there had found a way around the then King Baudouin’s refusal to sign a bill legalising abortion in 1990
Again the monarch claimed his catholic faith prevented him from approving the legislation
Again the monarch claimed his catholic faith prevented him from approving the legislation
February 14, 2025 at 7:19 PM
🇧🇪 There was precedent for this in neighbouring Belgium where officials there had found a way around the then King Baudouin’s refusal to sign a bill legalising abortion in 1990
Again the monarch claimed his catholic faith prevented him from approving the legislation
Again the monarch claimed his catholic faith prevented him from approving the legislation
Reposted by Daniel Rosney
Henri, a devout Catholic, said he couldn’t sign the bill because of “reasons of conscience”
Officials were blindsided by his decision because the democratically elected parliament had voted to legalise euthanasia, and had wrongly assumed the monarch would sanction the law
Officials were blindsided by his decision because the democratically elected parliament had voted to legalise euthanasia, and had wrongly assumed the monarch would sanction the law
February 14, 2025 at 7:19 PM
Henri, a devout Catholic, said he couldn’t sign the bill because of “reasons of conscience”
Officials were blindsided by his decision because the democratically elected parliament had voted to legalise euthanasia, and had wrongly assumed the monarch would sanction the law
Officials were blindsided by his decision because the democratically elected parliament had voted to legalise euthanasia, and had wrongly assumed the monarch would sanction the law
Reposted by Daniel Rosney
🇱🇺 This is Grand Duke Henri of Luxembourg - who’s stepping down later this year
Eight years into his reign, in 2008, he caused a constitutional crisis when he tried to use his ‘veto power’ to stop a euthanasia bill
Henri’s approval and signature was needed for it to become law
Eight years into his reign, in 2008, he caused a constitutional crisis when he tried to use his ‘veto power’ to stop a euthanasia bill
Henri’s approval and signature was needed for it to become law
February 14, 2025 at 7:19 PM
🇱🇺 This is Grand Duke Henri of Luxembourg - who’s stepping down later this year
Eight years into his reign, in 2008, he caused a constitutional crisis when he tried to use his ‘veto power’ to stop a euthanasia bill
Henri’s approval and signature was needed for it to become law
Eight years into his reign, in 2008, he caused a constitutional crisis when he tried to use his ‘veto power’ to stop a euthanasia bill
Henri’s approval and signature was needed for it to become law
A few moments later…
December 4, 2024 at 5:48 PM
A few moments later…