Daniel Whiteson
@danielwhiteson.bsky.social
Particle physics and ML (http://sites.uci.edu/daniel). Co-creator @DandKUniverse podcast and @ElinorWonders TV. Patreon: https://patreon.com/DanielWhiteson.
What do the red lines mean?
November 18, 2025 at 1:12 PM
What do the red lines mean?
Hi Ken -- just sent you an email to follow up!
November 16, 2025 at 8:25 PM
Hi Ken -- just sent you an email to follow up!
Did you say you thought our explanation got the classical limit wrong? AFAIK, our numbers align with these, which seem right to me: www.quantamagazine.org/how-bells-th...
Can you let me know where you think we erred?
Can you let me know where you think we erred?
How Bell’s Theorem Proved ‘Spooky Action at a Distance’ Is Real | Quanta Magazine
The root of today’s quantum revolution was John Stewart Bell’s 1964 theorem showing that quantum mechanics really permits instantaneous connections between far-apart locations.
www.quantamagazine.org
November 16, 2025 at 2:20 PM
Did you say you thought our explanation got the classical limit wrong? AFAIK, our numbers align with these, which seem right to me: www.quantamagazine.org/how-bells-th...
Can you let me know where you think we erred?
Can you let me know where you think we erred?
Hi gentlemen! We are planning a whole episode on retrocausality very soon. Or maybe we'll just go back in time and insert it into this one. :)
How Bell’s Theorem Proved ‘Spooky Action at a Distance’ Is Real | Quanta Magazine
The root of today’s quantum revolution was John Stewart Bell’s 1964 theorem showing that quantum mechanics really permits instantaneous connections between far-apart locations.
www.quantamagazine.org
November 16, 2025 at 2:20 PM
Hi gentlemen! We are planning a whole episode on retrocausality very soon. Or maybe we'll just go back in time and insert it into this one. :)
It means that we can describe them as part of a larger framework, not that they are identical.
It's like describing the front and back of an elephant as part of a larger unified animal. It doesn't make the front and back the same. :)
It's like describing the front and back of an elephant as part of a larger unified animal. It doesn't make the front and back the same. :)
November 14, 2025 at 7:45 PM
It means that we can describe them as part of a larger framework, not that they are identical.
It's like describing the front and back of an elephant as part of a larger unified animal. It doesn't make the front and back the same. :)
It's like describing the front and back of an elephant as part of a larger unified animal. It doesn't make the front and back the same. :)
Thanks for having me on!
November 5, 2025 at 2:27 AM
Thanks for having me on!
I'm famously not a fan of chemistry!
November 5, 2025 at 2:27 AM
I'm famously not a fan of chemistry!
Check it out: www.alienspeakphysics.com
November 4, 2025 at 3:29 PM
Check it out: www.alienspeakphysics.com
