Thanks for the response. My use of the word “material” was only in reference to the magnitude of the revision, which has been described by others as significant enough to impact debates on other issues, such as Canadian productivity for example. Wondering if we’ll see that on fiscal as well.
February 12, 2026 at 11:25 PM
Thanks for the response. My use of the word “material” was only in reference to the magnitude of the revision, which has been described by others as significant enough to impact debates on other issues, such as Canadian productivity for example. Wondering if we’ll see that on fiscal as well.
The Bank of Canada took note of these revisions in their latest report, but did not comment on fiscal policy implications, which is to be expected I guess.
Am I right in reading those revisions as material to Canada‘s fiscal position and/or targets? And if so who may be looking at that (non-govt)?
February 12, 2026 at 2:39 PM
The Bank of Canada took note of these revisions in their latest report, but did not comment on fiscal policy implications, which is to be expected I guess.
Am I right in reading those revisions as material to Canada‘s fiscal position and/or targets? And if so who may be looking at that (non-govt)?
There is very little evidence in the past 30 years that provincial govts of any stripe have been willing to put their money on the line to strengthen essential services. Harper transferred what, $900 million to Quebec to address the “fiscal imbalance,” and Charest paid it all out as a tax cut.
January 20, 2025 at 2:46 PM
There is very little evidence in the past 30 years that provincial govts of any stripe have been willing to put their money on the line to strengthen essential services. Harper transferred what, $900 million to Quebec to address the “fiscal imbalance,” and Charest paid it all out as a tax cut.
Postscript to this: i’ve now seen Luke Lebrun posting about some of the substantive differences with this platform and how they work. I think some people will be slow to trust, but there is reason for optimism.
November 14, 2024 at 6:48 PM
Postscript to this: i’ve now seen Luke Lebrun posting about some of the substantive differences with this platform and how they work. I think some people will be slow to trust, but there is reason for optimism.
The block tool may be better, but one of the reasons I’m here is to be able to enjoy engagement with different folks without being bombarded by bot armies operating with impunity. Big partisan accounts tend to attract that stuff, so I hope the T/C’s of this app are robust enough to keep things sane.
November 14, 2024 at 12:40 PM
The block tool may be better, but one of the reasons I’m here is to be able to enjoy engagement with different folks without being bombarded by bot armies operating with impunity. Big partisan accounts tend to attract that stuff, so I hope the T/C’s of this app are robust enough to keep things sane.