danofwales.bsky.social
@danofwales.bsky.social
Gay dad-through-adoption, welsh, maths teacher, Labour, mufc, bit nerdy… Hoping to not have to seek asylum after the next GE.
Yeah but if you can’t connect to Starmer no one cares 🤷‍♂️
January 30, 2026 at 9:51 PM
You are absolutely right, apologies! Wonder why I’ve confused the two… my bad
January 28, 2026 at 9:46 AM
JK has now started wanging on about 15 minute cities and that has nothing to do with biological sex. She’s radicalized.
January 28, 2026 at 9:34 AM
Was there actual coordination in 24? I got the impression that better polling led to voters being able to make better tactical decision…?
January 27, 2026 at 7:13 PM
But he’s a good Christian! Surely not?!
January 26, 2026 at 5:17 PM
Hi Stephen. I think our problem (assuming I’m included in this as someone who doesn’t think Starmer is the worst pm ever) is that as you say he does something competent and decisive and the universal framing from virtually every journo is negative. “Diminished Keir Starmer”.
January 26, 2026 at 12:13 PM
He’s Owen Smith Mk 2
January 25, 2026 at 7:03 PM
Well quite, but big tech have turned into neo nazi white supremacists. Not sure they care about any welfare.

Outrights bans will have a massive impact on queer kids, disabled kids, rural kids… When the biggest issue is clearly with older white men. Just feels like a cop-out comfort blanket.
January 25, 2026 at 5:57 PM
Or wait for actual evidence before yet again banning shit for other people? Just good governance no?
January 25, 2026 at 5:41 PM
Or you might keep the focus on the actual nazis murdering people in plain sight rather than try and turn this into another anti-starmer story, but hey ho 🤷‍♂️
January 25, 2026 at 5:37 PM
This was the only viable decision once Burnham declared war. It’s done. We move on.
January 25, 2026 at 5:33 PM
Cowardly? Only if you think punching yourself in the face is brave. Factional? Mate, this was all Andy Burnham’s doing. Long-term counter-strategic? To bring on an expensive future mayoral by-election that is very losable given current political insanity is counter-strategic.
January 25, 2026 at 5:32 PM
And here’s a member that would leave under Burnham. His hissy fit this weekend was pathetic. A selfish arrogant fool.
January 25, 2026 at 3:27 PM
Not all members! Some of us despise him for this. He has made a lot of enemies. And yet again his political intelligence is found wanting. Not the bloody centre left messiah!
January 25, 2026 at 1:56 PM
Fully agreed. He’s caused a big ruction that helps no one but (possibly) himself, and his messiah-complex followers. Big fight now, take the inevitable hit, wait for the next bonkers fascist story to emerge from trumps America and move the dialogue.
January 25, 2026 at 11:49 AM
You can’t push someone out from something they are not “in”.
January 25, 2026 at 10:26 AM
Where is this personality people keep talking about?
January 24, 2026 at 6:48 PM
I’m genuinely surprised by how angry this has made me.
January 24, 2026 at 5:51 PM
What’s that got to do with Andy Burnham?
January 22, 2026 at 5:42 PM
😆
January 22, 2026 at 5:26 PM
Stephen Bush’s version?
January 21, 2026 at 5:31 PM
Oh cmon! We’ve avoided the big orange baby’s biggest tariffs since the pedo-protector was elected. It has probably counted for something. Just not eternal protection.
January 17, 2026 at 4:46 PM
Stoned students might appreciate it?
January 16, 2026 at 8:32 PM