@danp83.bsky.social
Reposted
Does it really surprise anyone that ice agents are stealing personal possessions from their victims to sell for money?
It reminds me of some other enforcers that used to practice that same behavior
How far are we away from ice agents, pulling the gold teeth out of people in detention?
Not far
It reminds me of some other enforcers that used to practice that same behavior
How far are we away from ice agents, pulling the gold teeth out of people in detention?
Not far
January 15, 2026 at 2:39 PM
Does it really surprise anyone that ice agents are stealing personal possessions from their victims to sell for money?
It reminds me of some other enforcers that used to practice that same behavior
How far are we away from ice agents, pulling the gold teeth out of people in detention?
Not far
It reminds me of some other enforcers that used to practice that same behavior
How far are we away from ice agents, pulling the gold teeth out of people in detention?
Not far
I mean, it’s not on me to make Vigilantgrandma’s argument for them.
I’m not sure if there’s a way to know what the exact number is and that’s why I treat them all with suspicion. Same reason the ladies prefer a bear over a man. I prefer a bear over a cop.
Likewise, have a nice day.
I’m not sure if there’s a way to know what the exact number is and that’s why I treat them all with suspicion. Same reason the ladies prefer a bear over a man. I prefer a bear over a cop.
Likewise, have a nice day.
January 10, 2026 at 9:14 PM
I mean, it’s not on me to make Vigilantgrandma’s argument for them.
I’m not sure if there’s a way to know what the exact number is and that’s why I treat them all with suspicion. Same reason the ladies prefer a bear over a man. I prefer a bear over a cop.
Likewise, have a nice day.
I’m not sure if there’s a way to know what the exact number is and that’s why I treat them all with suspicion. Same reason the ladies prefer a bear over a man. I prefer a bear over a cop.
Likewise, have a nice day.
You also didn’t cite a source. 🤷♂️
Sorry, I just don’t trust a person on the internet’s “understanding”.
Agree, the system is corrupted beyond repair.
Sorry, I just don’t trust a person on the internet’s “understanding”.
Agree, the system is corrupted beyond repair.
January 10, 2026 at 3:44 PM
You also didn’t cite a source. 🤷♂️
Sorry, I just don’t trust a person on the internet’s “understanding”.
Agree, the system is corrupted beyond repair.
Sorry, I just don’t trust a person on the internet’s “understanding”.
Agree, the system is corrupted beyond repair.
Can you cite a source for the 1-5% number?
Or did you just make that up?
Or did you just make that up?
January 10, 2026 at 2:57 PM
Can you cite a source for the 1-5% number?
Or did you just make that up?
Or did you just make that up?
He’s one of the 25 Dems who voted to “Thank ICE” in 2025. Fuck Horsford.
January 10, 2026 at 2:45 PM
He’s one of the 25 Dems who voted to “Thank ICE” in 2025. Fuck Horsford.
You can keep repeating yourself, doesn’t make it anymore true.
In any case, the Dems aren’t even bothering to try. But really, what else is new?
In any case, the Dems aren’t even bothering to try. But really, what else is new?
December 3, 2025 at 3:02 PM
You can keep repeating yourself, doesn’t make it anymore true.
In any case, the Dems aren’t even bothering to try. But really, what else is new?
In any case, the Dems aren’t even bothering to try. But really, what else is new?
Really? You really think that hegseth commands the same loyalty among the R’s in congress as trump?
If so, I have a bridge to sell you…
If so, I have a bridge to sell you…
December 3, 2025 at 2:56 PM
Really? You really think that hegseth commands the same loyalty among the R’s in congress as trump?
If so, I have a bridge to sell you…
If so, I have a bridge to sell you…
Making it all the worse of a decision for the Dems to cave and end the shutdown without some actual concessions. Why trust a “dumpster fire”?
More fiery speeches and strong words, but caving when they could have held out and gotten something accomplished. Now they’ve given away any leverage.
More fiery speeches and strong words, but caving when they could have held out and gotten something accomplished. Now they’ve given away any leverage.
December 2, 2025 at 9:55 PM
Making it all the worse of a decision for the Dems to cave and end the shutdown without some actual concessions. Why trust a “dumpster fire”?
More fiery speeches and strong words, but caving when they could have held out and gotten something accomplished. Now they’ve given away any leverage.
More fiery speeches and strong words, but caving when they could have held out and gotten something accomplished. Now they’ve given away any leverage.
What a non sequitur….
The Republicans do. The Dems caved during the shutdown on the promise the R’s would bring it up to vote on before the end of the year.
Has it happened?
Is it on the schedule yet?
The Republicans do. The Dems caved during the shutdown on the promise the R’s would bring it up to vote on before the end of the year.
Has it happened?
Is it on the schedule yet?
December 2, 2025 at 9:41 PM
What a non sequitur….
The Republicans do. The Dems caved during the shutdown on the promise the R’s would bring it up to vote on before the end of the year.
Has it happened?
Is it on the schedule yet?
The Republicans do. The Dems caved during the shutdown on the promise the R’s would bring it up to vote on before the end of the year.
Has it happened?
Is it on the schedule yet?
Great, so maybe they’re finally starting to listen…
Promise they won’t throw it all away like they did during the shutdown, caving to Republicans in exchange for exactly nothing. Or did they schedule that ACA subsidy extension vote yet and I missed it?
Promise they won’t throw it all away like they did during the shutdown, caving to Republicans in exchange for exactly nothing. Or did they schedule that ACA subsidy extension vote yet and I missed it?
December 2, 2025 at 9:35 PM
Great, so maybe they’re finally starting to listen…
Promise they won’t throw it all away like they did during the shutdown, caving to Republicans in exchange for exactly nothing. Or did they schedule that ACA subsidy extension vote yet and I missed it?
Promise they won’t throw it all away like they did during the shutdown, caving to Republicans in exchange for exactly nothing. Or did they schedule that ACA subsidy extension vote yet and I missed it?
Since they aren’t doing that, we’d settle for “something”. Instead, they cave to republicans regularly and have only strong words and “clever” one-liners at press conferences to deliver.
“Do something” because it’s better than what they’ve been doing. Gotta start somewhere.
“Do something” because it’s better than what they’ve been doing. Gotta start somewhere.
December 2, 2025 at 9:30 PM
Since they aren’t doing that, we’d settle for “something”. Instead, they cave to republicans regularly and have only strong words and “clever” one-liners at press conferences to deliver.
“Do something” because it’s better than what they’ve been doing. Gotta start somewhere.
“Do something” because it’s better than what they’ve been doing. Gotta start somewhere.
They’re talking about impeaching hegseth, not Trump, in this instance. That distinction matters.
December 2, 2025 at 2:47 PM
They’re talking about impeaching hegseth, not Trump, in this instance. That distinction matters.
That would be too much like actual work though and not at all a strongly worded letter. So, they’ll probably pass on the opportunity so they can get some powerful one-liners in at a press conference. 🙄
December 2, 2025 at 2:33 PM
That would be too much like actual work though and not at all a strongly worded letter. So, they’ll probably pass on the opportunity so they can get some powerful one-liners in at a press conference. 🙄
It was political malpractice to vote for the CR. The people you claim to represent are disappointed in your performance. You failed. Resign.
November 16, 2025 at 4:05 PM
It was political malpractice to vote for the CR. The people you claim to represent are disappointed in your performance. You failed. Resign.
He doesn’t understand it himself. How can he “get it through” to anyone???
November 16, 2025 at 4:03 PM
He doesn’t understand it himself. How can he “get it through” to anyone???
To be fair, Dems in both the senate and house attempted to strip this from the bill and were outvoted by republicans to keep it in.
It should never have come up for a vote if it weren’t for the 8 betrayers and a weak Schumer.
It should never have come up for a vote if it weren’t for the 8 betrayers and a weak Schumer.
November 14, 2025 at 2:37 PM
To be fair, Dems in both the senate and house attempted to strip this from the bill and were outvoted by republicans to keep it in.
It should never have come up for a vote if it weren’t for the 8 betrayers and a weak Schumer.
It should never have come up for a vote if it weren’t for the 8 betrayers and a weak Schumer.
Reposted
Except the Supreme Court already said he can’t do illegal things while acting in his official capacity.
There’s no “legal” way out of this. He’s been made untouchable.
There’s no “legal” way out of this. He’s been made untouchable.
October 17, 2025 at 1:34 PM
Except the Supreme Court already said he can’t do illegal things while acting in his official capacity.
There’s no “legal” way out of this. He’s been made untouchable.
There’s no “legal” way out of this. He’s been made untouchable.
Didn’t you say that we had to carry on the important work that Charlie Kirk was doing? THIS is the “important work” that you supported when you said that.
October 15, 2025 at 8:16 PM
Didn’t you say that we had to carry on the important work that Charlie Kirk was doing? THIS is the “important work” that you supported when you said that.
Actually u didn’t even go that far. I said I prefer presidents who don’t attack the homeless.
You all came out of your hair about it.
You all came out of your hair about it.
October 9, 2025 at 9:38 PM
Actually u didn’t even go that far. I said I prefer presidents who don’t attack the homeless.
You all came out of your hair about it.
You all came out of your hair about it.
You invited yourself onto this thread. I was exactly on point for what I was responding to. Not the OP.
Swede said he’d make a great president. I disagree. You inserted yourself in to make some point, but you are the interrupter here. 🤷♂️
Swede said he’d make a great president. I disagree. You inserted yourself in to make some point, but you are the interrupter here. 🤷♂️
October 9, 2025 at 9:35 PM
You invited yourself onto this thread. I was exactly on point for what I was responding to. Not the OP.
Swede said he’d make a great president. I disagree. You inserted yourself in to make some point, but you are the interrupter here. 🤷♂️
Swede said he’d make a great president. I disagree. You inserted yourself in to make some point, but you are the interrupter here. 🤷♂️