Dmitry Antipov
@dantipov.bsky.social
120 followers 48 following 23 posts
Genome assemblers and their friends. Postdoc at https://genomeinformatics.github.io/
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
dantipov.bsky.social
Molecular Mechanisms in Evolution GRC conference short recap
dantipov.bsky.social
I believe this to be one of the most important things now. www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024...

Guardian missed that this guy is also a long-time business partner of Peter Thiel and is really influential among those tech bros.

I've read his manifestos. They are frightening and really match the news
He’s anti-democracy and pro-Trump: the obscure ‘dark enlightenment’ blogger influencing the next US administration
Key figures in the incoming administration follow Curtis Yarvin, who’s pushing for an autocratic takeover of the US
www.theguardian.com
dantipov.bsky.social
In the average lab you develop a proof of concept level software to support your part of a research project and do it alone. So realistically only the version control would be clearly beneficial.

The thing is that even computational methods development labs often miss a lot of your points
dantipov.bsky.social
This post hurts a lot!
dantipov.bsky.social
TLDR:
Prolonged reviewing process may lead to situations when at least a part of a paper is clearly outdated and looks weird at the moment of publication.
And I do not know how this should be fixed, assuming that we cannot always make review iterations fast.
dantipov.bsky.social
As a reader I would be happy if the journal would restart the reviewing process from scratch, with new reviewers. For all papers in progress, submitted too long (a year?) ago.
But as an author, I would be completely pissed off in such a situation.
dantipov.bsky.social
Likely reviewers had some other questions and on the next round had no reasons to return to sections they already found to be OK. And authors were not encouraged to provide unrequested changes.
dantipov.bsky.social
This is the answer. At September 2022 Verkko was already released and even preprint was published peer-reviewed; hifiasm was in process of adding the support for ONT.. No peer-reviewed publications for ONT+HiFi for both.
dantipov.bsky.social
So, one of two likely most popular tools in the field is completely ignored, and the other is run in the way it would produce clearly inferior assemblies! With no motivation in the text!

Junk paper? Bad reviewing quality?
None of the above!
dantipov.bsky.social
Ok, I can be biased about verkko, let's check hifiasm... Wow, it was run without ONT!
dantipov.bsky.social
Merfin is not an assembler, but I can understand what they mean. However, don't you feel that something is missing?
dantipov.bsky.social
So, it is an Illumina+ONT based polishing pipeline, that is focused on diploid genomes and assumed to work after Flye assembler. Stated to be comparable or even better than state of the art HiFi "haplotype-resolved" assemblers. Pipeline itself looks decent, so I go directly to benchmarking..
dantipov.bsky.social
Want to discuss a thing about reviewing process. It is far from "ai-generated alpha male rat" level of weirdness, but still weird for me, and I really do not know how it should be fixed.
Let's look on the article on diploid aware polisher. Published just a week ago
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
dantipov.bsky.social
Was not good in finding appropriate words. Of course it is not just "death", it is murder.
dantipov.bsky.social
Alexey Navalny's death is a disaster for everyone who dreams of free and peaceful Russia
Reposted by Dmitry Antipov
sergeynurk.bsky.social
One more opening in my group at Oxford Nanopore. This time in our New York office!
ejnh.fa.em2.oraclecloud.com/hcmUI/Candid...
dantipov.bsky.social
Finally verkko 2.0 is out! github.com/marbl/verkko Waiting for your bug reports;)

My dream for 46 t2t scaffolds on the de novo human genome assemblies out of the box is still a dream, but for some samples we are really close.
dantipov.bsky.social
Ok, got your email, thank you! nice "practical" solution but still have questions
dantipov.bsky.social
Consider a DAG with edges having both weight and length. Problem: find a path between given vertices with highest _average_ weight (= total_w/total_l). Is it known to be NP-hard in general case? Looks similar to 0-1 knapsack, but I failed to construct polynomial reduction..
Reposted by Dmitry Antipov
aphillippy.bsky.social
"Minmers are a generalization of minimizers that enable unbiased local jaccard estimation" aka MashMap3 with Bryce Kille, @erikg.bsky.social, and @treangen.bsky.social is now accepted in Bioinformatics! Many thanks to the reviewers for their very careful reviews doi.org/10.1093/bioi...
dantipov.bsky.social
Ok, let's give this one a try too