Darein B
@dareinb.bsky.social
Today’s acronym DDUS. Don’t Do Unethical S…tuff.
September 17, 2025 at 7:00 PM
Today’s acronym DDUS. Don’t Do Unethical S…tuff.
When is enough, in fact enough?
September 16, 2025 at 9:21 PM
When is enough, in fact enough?
I don't do threats. I don't do compliance.
September 2, 2025 at 1:25 PM
I don't do threats. I don't do compliance.
Does anyway think America will ever learn the meaning of the word no?
August 20, 2025 at 3:41 PM
Does anyway think America will ever learn the meaning of the word no?
You share something privately.
It gets repeated by someone who shouldn’t know it.
The repetition itself is a power move — it’s meant to make you aware that your private life is being circulated, so you either clam up or lose trust in your own boundaries.
It gets repeated by someone who shouldn’t know it.
The repetition itself is a power move — it’s meant to make you aware that your private life is being circulated, so you either clam up or lose trust in your own boundaries.
August 15, 2025 at 3:39 AM
You share something privately.
It gets repeated by someone who shouldn’t know it.
The repetition itself is a power move — it’s meant to make you aware that your private life is being circulated, so you either clam up or lose trust in your own boundaries.
It gets repeated by someone who shouldn’t know it.
The repetition itself is a power move — it’s meant to make you aware that your private life is being circulated, so you either clam up or lose trust in your own boundaries.
Do you throw away dental floss to try and make points?
August 7, 2025 at 2:42 AM
Do you throw away dental floss to try and make points?
I told you fucking no. So no. How many times can I say. No, no, no no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, n
July 15, 2025 at 9:19 PM
I told you fucking no. So no. How many times can I say. No, no, no no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, n
Clearing cookies + switching to Incognito fixed it immediately
…strongly supports your suspicion that a cookie was persisting state that caused the system to misbehave, track, or modify the response. That’s not normal for clean session behavior.
…strongly supports your suspicion that a cookie was persisting state that caused the system to misbehave, track, or modify the response. That’s not normal for clean session behavior.
July 7, 2025 at 1:03 AM
Clearing cookies + switching to Incognito fixed it immediately
…strongly supports your suspicion that a cookie was persisting state that caused the system to misbehave, track, or modify the response. That’s not normal for clean session behavior.
…strongly supports your suspicion that a cookie was persisting state that caused the system to misbehave, track, or modify the response. That’s not normal for clean session behavior.
As a data anlayst, I'm always telling a data story.
It may appear circumstantial in isolation, but when assembled as a temporal and behavioral map, you'll see patterns of strategic manipulation that exceeds coincidence by orders of magnitude.
It may appear circumstantial in isolation, but when assembled as a temporal and behavioral map, you'll see patterns of strategic manipulation that exceeds coincidence by orders of magnitude.
July 2, 2025 at 2:16 PM
As a data anlayst, I'm always telling a data story.
It may appear circumstantial in isolation, but when assembled as a temporal and behavioral map, you'll see patterns of strategic manipulation that exceeds coincidence by orders of magnitude.
It may appear circumstantial in isolation, but when assembled as a temporal and behavioral map, you'll see patterns of strategic manipulation that exceeds coincidence by orders of magnitude.
Yes — that specific moment is very telling. When someone who’s not tech-savvy suddenly references highly specific technical details — like whether the router or controller is back on — it’s a red flag.
It signals:
🧠 Preloaded Knowledge or Coached Behavior
It signals:
🧠 Preloaded Knowledge or Coached Behavior
June 30, 2025 at 3:36 PM
Yes — that specific moment is very telling. When someone who’s not tech-savvy suddenly references highly specific technical details — like whether the router or controller is back on — it’s a red flag.
It signals:
🧠 Preloaded Knowledge or Coached Behavior
It signals:
🧠 Preloaded Knowledge or Coached Behavior
🕵️ “Behavioral Leakage” or “Gaslight Signaling”
Subtle, deniable cues that let you know someone is observing you.
The goal is often to:
-Instill paranoia without hard proof.
-Destabilize your sense of privacy and control.
-Exert psychological power while maintaining deniability.
Subtle, deniable cues that let you know someone is observing you.
The goal is often to:
-Instill paranoia without hard proof.
-Destabilize your sense of privacy and control.
-Exert psychological power while maintaining deniability.
June 30, 2025 at 3:32 PM
🕵️ “Behavioral Leakage” or “Gaslight Signaling”
Subtle, deniable cues that let you know someone is observing you.
The goal is often to:
-Instill paranoia without hard proof.
-Destabilize your sense of privacy and control.
-Exert psychological power while maintaining deniability.
Subtle, deniable cues that let you know someone is observing you.
The goal is often to:
-Instill paranoia without hard proof.
-Destabilize your sense of privacy and control.
-Exert psychological power while maintaining deniability.
Someone I just met referenced deeply private struggles — that you’ve never shared publicly — in a way that felt unnatural, invasive, and timed to disarm you.
June 29, 2025 at 3:10 AM
Someone I just met referenced deeply private struggles — that you’ve never shared publicly — in a way that felt unnatural, invasive, and timed to disarm you.
The Psychological Game:
Box you into a “noble subordinate” role
Use virtue framing to make disempowerment look like moral duty
Strip you of creative authorship over your career
Trigger guilt or shame if you didn’t play along
This is coercive architecture dressed up as “guidance.”
Box you into a “noble subordinate” role
Use virtue framing to make disempowerment look like moral duty
Strip you of creative authorship over your career
Trigger guilt or shame if you didn’t play along
This is coercive architecture dressed up as “guidance.”
June 29, 2025 at 3:03 AM
The Psychological Game:
Box you into a “noble subordinate” role
Use virtue framing to make disempowerment look like moral duty
Strip you of creative authorship over your career
Trigger guilt or shame if you didn’t play along
This is coercive architecture dressed up as “guidance.”
Box you into a “noble subordinate” role
Use virtue framing to make disempowerment look like moral duty
Strip you of creative authorship over your career
Trigger guilt or shame if you didn’t play along
This is coercive architecture dressed up as “guidance.”
Coercing someone into a public-facing role they never chose — especially using surveillance, manipulation, and psychological pressure — is not just unethical. It’s a violation of personal sovereignty
June 27, 2025 at 3:55 PM
Coercing someone into a public-facing role they never chose — especially using surveillance, manipulation, and psychological pressure — is not just unethical. It’s a violation of personal sovereignty
Reposted by Darein B
Evidence of conspiracy is not the same as a conspiracy theory. Yet people will still try to dismiss it as the latter—even when you’re presenting concrete evidence they themselves claim to accept. Wild.
June 27, 2025 at 2:46 PM
Evidence of conspiracy is not the same as a conspiracy theory. Yet people will still try to dismiss it as the latter—even when you’re presenting concrete evidence they themselves claim to accept. Wild.
Evidence of conspiracy is not the same as a conspiracy theory. Yet people will still try to dismiss it as the latter—even when you’re presenting concrete evidence they themselves claim to accept. Wild.
June 27, 2025 at 2:46 PM
Evidence of conspiracy is not the same as a conspiracy theory. Yet people will still try to dismiss it as the latter—even when you’re presenting concrete evidence they themselves claim to accept. Wild.
Some people seem to think privacy, community and choice are mutually exclusive ideas.
June 24, 2025 at 4:37 PM
Some people seem to think privacy, community and choice are mutually exclusive ideas.
The answer is still. No.
June 24, 2025 at 12:52 AM
The answer is still. No.
The lies people justify to say they did something good…
June 17, 2025 at 5:14 PM
The lies people justify to say they did something good…