www.youtube.com/@DarkNookShop
Trump and Casablancas were running the teen modeling events as a front, to lure in potential victims for Epstein and Brunel to select from.
Trump and Casablancas were running the teen modeling events as a front, to lure in potential victims for Epstein and Brunel to select from.
Brunel would "scout" girls from those events.
www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020...
Brunel would "scout" girls from those events.
www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020...
But on the most basic level, that's an animal intentionally altering it's aesthetic environment, to provoke a behavioral, if not emotional response in another. Pure art.
But on the most basic level, that's an animal intentionally altering it's aesthetic environment, to provoke a behavioral, if not emotional response in another. Pure art.
It's like saying do I control my airbrush or does the air compressor control it. The compressor produces a necessary condition for the brush to function. Is that control?
It's like saying do I control my airbrush or does the air compressor control it. The compressor produces a necessary condition for the brush to function. Is that control?
And guess where Brunel lived all though the 1990's?
If you guessed Trump Tower, you'd be correct.
And guess where Brunel lived all though the 1990's?
If you guessed Trump Tower, you'd be correct.
Trump, Casablancas, and Brunel.
They ran teen modeling agencies and events, that were just a front for trafficking girls to Epstein.
Trump wasn't a customer.
He was a fucking supplier.
BTW google how Brunel died...
Trump, Casablancas, and Brunel.
They ran teen modeling agencies and events, that were just a front for trafficking girls to Epstein.
Trump wasn't a customer.
He was a fucking supplier.
BTW google how Brunel died...
But then I've seen some abstract art that's stupidly simple too. It's not whataboutism.
I'm just trying to figure out what the consistent standard is.
But then I've seen some abstract art that's stupidly simple too. It's not whataboutism.
I'm just trying to figure out what the consistent standard is.
Not just animals in zoos we give some paint to, to see what they'll do... but there are a lot of birds, for example, who will gather shiny stuff or blue stuff to decorate a nest to impress a mate. Sounds like a lot of artists I know.
Not just animals in zoos we give some paint to, to see what they'll do... but there are a lot of birds, for example, who will gather shiny stuff or blue stuff to decorate a nest to impress a mate. Sounds like a lot of artists I know.
The machine can only do what it's told, and in this case it's being told to mimic the process according to the instructions given, and produce an image.
Seem the choice is made by the one giving instructions.
The machine can only do what it's told, and in this case it's being told to mimic the process according to the instructions given, and produce an image.
Seem the choice is made by the one giving instructions.
I've had Foxy Shazam's 'Dreamer' stuck in my head for a month.
I've had Foxy Shazam's 'Dreamer' stuck in my head for a month.
Plenty of artists are shitheads, and everybody wants their rewards to outweigh their efforts.
I mean if Michelangelo had a tool that would cut marble like it was cheddar cheese, would he be less of an artist for not using a chisel?
Plenty of artists are shitheads, and everybody wants their rewards to outweigh their efforts.
I mean if Michelangelo had a tool that would cut marble like it was cheddar cheese, would he be less of an artist for not using a chisel?