David Stansell
daves1412.bsky.social
David Stansell
@daves1412.bsky.social
(Green) politics, tech. Trying to answer the question “How?”

Accessible in fediverse as @[email protected]

Please note: Highly unlikely to respond to DM's, unless I know you in the physical realm!
A *what*?
January 29, 2026 at 9:23 PM
At the same time the speech was about all the middle powers, and (IMO) correctly set a path for us all. Starmer never seems to communicate strategy, let alone vision and (again IMO) that is his core weakness
January 29, 2026 at 10:57 AM
Yes. I try to find points of agreement even with people who shout at me on the Internet, then when we do agree (it could be me changing my view) count that as a win
January 26, 2026 at 12:16 PM
Exposure to demands for payment based on fair value calculations. It’s unfortunately a terrible mess how these valuations are carried out, at least as I understand them
January 23, 2026 at 2:03 PM
And that’s what Putin desires most of all. Or at least I’m guessing he thinks he does.
January 21, 2026 at 8:01 PM
I think it has likely crossed the chasm in terms of use, but you are right that there is an issue with financial return. My technically informed but non-expert view is that the required compute will become orders of magnitude less energy expensive - much of it in the end it is analogue style compute
January 20, 2026 at 10:59 AM
Terrible situation. Have no beef with the US nor its inhabitants. The President though
a man in a basketball jersey is looking at the camera .
ALT: a man in a basketball jersey is looking at the camera .
media.tenor.com
January 19, 2026 at 2:22 PM
Yep 👍
January 18, 2026 at 4:13 PM
Great - thanks, and see you in a few weeks
January 17, 2026 at 6:01 PM
Yes please!
January 17, 2026 at 5:59 PM
lol sounds eminently plausible. Bumped into some local Lab activists/officers quite a while ago - around the time of Brexit from memory - and let’s just say their comments were not complimentary.
January 17, 2026 at 1:14 PM
Haha brilliant!
January 17, 2026 at 1:01 PM
You naughty person, you (PS stolen)
January 17, 2026 at 10:11 AM
She is/was hated by her local (Lab) party.
January 17, 2026 at 10:10 AM
Deary me. These shadily funded outfits represent the Enshittification of politics
January 17, 2026 at 10:08 AM
Interesting. Not for me and I’m a leftie. I do think we can be a bit stick in the mud at times, also that moving fast and breaking things in public services is rarely a smart idea, because unlike in the private sector there is no fallback alternative. I’m a private sector person TBH.
January 14, 2026 at 10:13 PM
That might be the plan. Very tricky. My hope is some in the US armed forces will refuse to do some things for him as a consequence. I just hope I’m right
January 14, 2026 at 10:07 PM
My guess is yes. Because it isn’t actually Star. I gather in fairness that Coors/Molsen (?) have invested in the Prague brewery but for some reason it’s product doesn’t manage to enter this country in significant quantities, apart from being sold in specialist locations. Wonder why? 🤔
January 14, 2026 at 9:55 PM
That’s fascism right there, that is
January 14, 2026 at 9:53 PM
Or the Epstein files
January 14, 2026 at 3:24 PM
The worst travesty for me was Coors(?) buying Staropromen and then selling the most terrible stuff in the UK labelled “inspired by … “. Presumably brewed in Burton? Awful
January 14, 2026 at 3:19 PM
Pardon?
January 14, 2026 at 2:19 PM
Poor
January 14, 2026 at 1:33 PM
PS - DM?
January 4, 2026 at 10:05 PM