David G. Clark
@david-g-clark.bsky.social
410 followers 460 following 130 posts
Theoretical neuroscientist Research fellow @ Kempner Institute, Harvard dclark.io
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by David G. Clark
Reposted by David G. Clark
kristorpjensen.bsky.social
I’m super excited to finally put my recent work with @behrenstimb.bsky.social on bioRxiv, where we develop a new mechanistic theory of how PFC structures adaptive behaviour using attractor dynamics in space and time!

www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...
Reposted by David G. Clark
bio-emergent.bsky.social
🎉 "High-dimensional neuronal activity from low-dimensional latent dynamics: a solvable model" will be presented as an oral at #NeurIPS2025 🎉

Feeling very grateful that reviewers and chairs appreciated concise mathematical explanations, in this age of big models.

www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...
1/2
david-g-clark.bsky.social
A great reading list for historical+recent RNN theory
david-g-clark.bsky.social
(26/26) Finally, one more HUGE shoutout to Albert Wakhloo for conceiving, calculating, and charting our way through this fascinating project.

(Link, again: www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...)
david-g-clark.bsky.social
(25/26) This work emphasizes that understanding memory-related neural activity requires modeling synaptic and neuronal dynamics together. Separating these processes, while convenient, can obscure circuit functions. Coupling enables new forms of computation beyond what either process achieves alone.
david-g-clark.bsky.social
(24/26) This mechanism is evocative of experimental findings in motor cortex and sensory areas that reveal apparent constraints on neural activity patterns during learning (e.g., from Yu, Batista, Chase, et al.).
david-g-clark.bsky.social
(23/26) Some concluding thoughts. In many models of synaptic plasticity-based learning, weight updates simply overwrite existing connectivity. Our model points out that plasticity can instead dramatically shape dynamics by manipulating the dynamic reservoir provided by static backbone connectivity.
david-g-clark.bsky.social
(22/26) Furthermore, studies report persistent oscillations following periodic stimuli & phase-locking to LFP oscillations during WM tasks, interpreted as evidence for intrinsic oscillatory circuitry. Our results suggest this may arise via ongoing plasticity, without preexisting circuit structure.
david-g-clark.bsky.social
(21/26) What about experimental links? Many working-memory (WM) studies report complex dynamic activity following stim. cessation, not aligning neatly with "sustained firing" WM theories. Our results suggest such activity could be generated by Hebbian plasticity, also underlying canonical WM models.
david-g-clark.bsky.social
(20/26) In sum, we have arrived at a conceptual understanding of, and analytical solution to, the behavior of coupled neuronal-synaptic dynamics in a nonlinear, input-driven recurrent network. In particular, we have shown that this behavior enables a useful computational function: dynamic memory.
david-g-clark.bsky.social
(19/26) Furthermore, we show that, while Ψ is not in general an eigenvector of J, it becomes an increasingly good approximate eigenvector as ν → g⁺. Thus, the mechanism is essentially the same as in the targeted case.
david-g-clark.bsky.social
(18/26) Using this approximation, we derive exact large-N expressions for outlier eigenvalues λ = g²ν/|ν|² + α/(|ν|² - g²). This correctly predicts the full phenomenology of persistent oscillations, including amplitude and frequency dependence, preferred frequency bands, and regime transitions.
david-g-clark.bsky.social
(17/26) Let us now return to the full, random-phase input case. We approximate A(0) ≈ 2α Re{ΨΨ†} where Ψ = (νI − J)⁻¹eⁱᶿ. Here, eⁱᶿ is a vector containing input phases θᵢ for each neuron; ν is a complex scalar that depends on the system parameters; and α = kI²/4.
david-g-clark.bsky.social
(16/26) This leads to a dynamic analog of Hopfield networks: rather than evoking static patterns by aligning inputs to symmetric-connectivity eigenstructure, we evoke dynamic patterns by aligning inputs to asymmetric-connectivity eigenstructure.
david-g-clark.bsky.social
(15/26) We show that, at large N, adding  to J pulls eigenvalue η to λ = η + α, generating complex-conjugate outliers that can drive oscillations. Furthermore, A(0) ≈  can be generated using oscillatory inputs whose single-neuron phases are chosen based on the eigenvector ψ.
david-g-clark.bsky.social
(14/26) To understand this alignment mechanism, we consider a toy scenario involving a "target" matrix  = 2α Re{ψψ†} where ψ is an eigenvector of J with complex eigenvalue η and α is a real scalar (thus,  is real, symmetric, and rank-two).
david-g-clark.bsky.social
(13/26) Thus, to create complex outliers, A(t) must become correlated with J. This can happen only if activity reflects both inputs and recurrence, explaining the significance of being in the "intermediate" regime. Indeed, A(t) aligns to eigenvector subspaces of J associated w/ complex eigenvalues.
david-g-clark.bsky.social
(12/26) The emergence of these complex outliers is surprising! Hebbian plasticity produces symmetric weight updates where A(t) = A(t)ᵀ, and symmetric matrices have only real eigenvalues. Moreover, adding a fixed low-rank symmetric matrix to a random J can only create real outliers at large N.
david-g-clark.bsky.social
(11/26) We now turn to mechanistic understanding. Persistent oscillations occur when J + A(t) has complex-conjugate outlier eigenvalues at stimulation offset (t=0). In particular, while networks in the persistent-oscillation regime develop complex outliers, other regimes develop only real outliers.
david-g-clark.bsky.social
(10/26) The frequency of persistent oscillations tracks the input frequency (within a preferred band). That is, faster inputs generally produce faster persistent oscillations. Thus, the autonomous dynamics reflect the temporal structure of previously experienced stimuli, indicating a dynamic memory!
david-g-clark.bsky.social
(9/26) Persistent oscillations occur in an "intermediate" dynamic regime where activity expresses features of both external inputs and recurrent connectivity. In particular, too-strong inputs lead to neuronal activity being dominated by the input alone, preventing persistent oscillations.
david-g-clark.bsky.social
(8/26) These "persistent oscillations" require ongoing plasticity, exemplifying a self-renewing, coupled neuronal-synaptic process. In particular, persistent oscillations are thwarted if we prevent neurons from influencing synapses (i.e., if the closed neuronal-synaptic loop is opened) for t≥0.