David Gokhman
@david-gokhman.bsky.social
290 followers 240 following 31 posts
Asst Prof @WeizmannScience. Exploring human evolution through the lens of gene regulation🧬 Still rooting for Neanderthals & Denisovans💀❤️ gokhmanlab.com
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
david-gokhman.bsky.social
Interested in discovering the genetic changes that made us human? Our lab is looking for students and postdocs! 👩‍🔬👨‍🔬 gokhmanlab.com
please RT!
david-gokhman.bsky.social
It was a true pleasure to work on this with @nadavmishol.bsky.social, @lirancarmel.bsky.social
, Gadi Herzlinger, Uzy Smilansky, and Yoel Rak
david-gokhman.bsky.social
This approach opens a new way to connect genetics & fossils, helping classify debated human remains and refine our evolutionary tree.
david-gokhman.bsky.social
Denisovans or their close relatives identified in the fossil record using a gene regulatory phenotyping method. Now out:
www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...
Credit: Maayan Harel
Reposted by David Gokhman
gilig.bsky.social
🧵 Excited to share a new preprint from our lab looking into signals of disease-burden in aDNA (doi.org/10.1101/2025...)! It has long been speculated that transition to sedentary, agricultural and urbanized lifestyle increases disease burden, but can we see this in aDNA?
david-gokhman.bsky.social
Overall, we suggest that substantially more phenotypic information can be inferred from genetic data than previously appreciated. Had a great time working on this with @gilig.bsky.social @shaicarmi.bsky.social and Keith Harris
david-gokhman.bsky.social
Importantly, unlike quantitative phenotypic predictions (e.g., based on polygenic scores), we show that our qualitative approach circumvents one of the biggest problems in population genetics – the limited transferability of genotype-phenotype association data across populations
david-gokhman.bsky.social
This estimator can be applied to comparisons of individuals from the same family, same population, different populations, or even different species
david-gokhman.bsky.social
Our method works even when genotype-to-phenotype information is limited. For example, we show that even in phenotypes where known SNPs explain only 3% of phenotypic variation, you can often predict with >90% accuracy who has the higher phenotypic value
david-gokhman.bsky.social
For additional specimens we think likely belong to Denisovans, see Nadav Mishol's beautiful preprint, in collaboration with
@lirancarmel.bsky.social www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...
david-gokhman.bsky.social
Although a Denisovan pinky bone has been discovered, testing our pinky-related prediction also requires the proximal and intermediate phalanges. Once those are found, we’ll also be able to test whether Denisovan phalanges exhibit the predicted tapering from proximal to distal
david-gokhman.bsky.social
Our approach was based on gene regulatory phenotyping, which predicts the direction, rather than magnitude, of phenotypic difference - a much more attainable goal. If you're interested in why and how this approach works, see: www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...
www.biorxiv.org
david-gokhman.bsky.social
Interestingly, our Denisovan trait prediction accuracy now stands at 89% - matching the accuracy we estimated using Neanderthal and chimpanzee data. Always nice when the model does what it says on the tin.
david-gokhman.bsky.social
Overall 25/28 of our predictions have been confirmed. Not too shabby for profiling an extinct species from DNA methylation maps!
david-gokhman.bsky.social
6 years ago, we predicted what Denisovans probably looked like. Since then, every new Denisovan specimen💀 - Harbin, Penghu, Xiahe - matched it beautifully.
☑️ Xiahe: 4/4 features match the profile
☑️ Penghu: 5/6
☑️ and now: Harbin with 16/18!
See 🧵
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31539495/
david-gokhman.bsky.social
And the first genetic evidence supporting this was posted last year: www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...
www.biorxiv.org
david-gokhman.bsky.social
First genetic evidence that Harbin was likely a Denisovan was here: www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...
www.biorxiv.org
david-gokhman.bsky.social
Last year, we posted a preprint providing the first genetic evidence that the Harbin skull likely belonged to a Denisovan: www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1... Today, DNA evidence provided the final proof: www-sciencedirect-com.ezproxy.weizmann.ac.il/science/arti...
david-gokhman.bsky.social
It is! And yes, we’re going to have brain-related data soon and I’m super curious to see if the variants we report played a role in human brain evo too!
david-gokhman.bsky.social
Find out about other potential Denisovan specimens here, in a beautiful work led by Nadav Mishol: www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1... @lirancarmel.bsky.social
david-gokhman.bsky.social
A common mistake when evaluating the profile is normalizing features (e.g., by breadth). But since the profile includes independent predictions affecting length, height, and breadth, normalization cancels out key signals. Absolute values are the way to go here, and they align with our predictions.