David C.
@davidcernat.bsky.social
Programmer, lover of film and music history. I try to get along with everyone when possible.
I'm the lead developer of TES3MP, also currently working on my own game.
I'm the lead developer of TES3MP, also currently working on my own game.
I'm assuming you haven't even looked at the witness statements from people in the same friend group that were all in his favor:
October 16, 2025 at 5:12 PM
I'm assuming you haven't even looked at the witness statements from people in the same friend group that were all in his favor:
You should also listen to the witness statements from the same friend group, like this one, also from a woman:
October 5, 2025 at 9:33 PM
You should also listen to the witness statements from the same friend group, like this one, also from a woman:
The SA allegations ring different in light of the witness statements that were all in Chris' favor:
September 25, 2025 at 2:09 PM
The SA allegations ring different in light of the witness statements that were all in Chris' favor:
This is wrong. Tim and Chris are friends in real life, and Tim has defended Chris' interpretation of Fallout's themes as you can see here:
August 26, 2025 at 3:43 AM
This is wrong. Tim and Chris are friends in real life, and Tim has defended Chris' interpretation of Fallout's themes as you can see here:
Alright, I wonder the definition is in Black's Law Dictionary. Surely that's as prestigious a law dictionary as you're going to find.
Oh...
Well, what do you think of that?
Oh...
Well, what do you think of that?
August 21, 2025 at 2:00 AM
Alright, I wonder the definition is in Black's Law Dictionary. Surely that's as prestigious a law dictionary as you're going to find.
Oh...
Well, what do you think of that?
Oh...
Well, what do you think of that?
Nope, it was in the exact same situation of being a psychological term that people were misusing as an insult. It's literally the immediately previous iteration of the same phenomenon:
August 21, 2025 at 12:59 AM
Nope, it was in the exact same situation of being a psychological term that people were misusing as an insult. It's literally the immediately previous iteration of the same phenomenon:
Is there a particular reason you're ignoring what the Virginia State Bar website calls it?
August 20, 2025 at 8:22 PM
Is there a particular reason you're ignoring what the Virginia State Bar website calls it?
I see the Virginia State Bar has also made this common mistake. Perhaps you should take it up with them first:
August 20, 2025 at 8:10 PM
I see the Virginia State Bar has also made this common mistake. Perhaps you should take it up with them first:
As mentioned, the Virginia State Bar claims to be a "bar association" (lowercase) on its own website:
August 20, 2025 at 8:07 PM
As mentioned, the Virginia State Bar claims to be a "bar association" (lowercase) on its own website:
I'm saying State Bars are also "bar associations", or rather a type of "bar association" which it's okay to still call a "bar association". Your friends are disagreeing (and derailed the original topic into this).
I think what you and them are doing is imposing a colloquial definition:
I think what you and them are doing is imposing a colloquial definition:
August 20, 2025 at 8:02 PM
I'm saying State Bars are also "bar associations", or rather a type of "bar association" which it's okay to still call a "bar association". Your friends are disagreeing (and derailed the original topic into this).
I think what you and them are doing is imposing a colloquial definition:
I think what you and them are doing is imposing a colloquial definition:
Do you care about what is said on the website of the Virginia State Bar which you are a part of?
August 20, 2025 at 7:56 PM
Do you care about what is said on the website of the Virginia State Bar which you are a part of?
I wonder why the American Bar Association is referring to them as "state bar associations" in its own FAQ!
August 20, 2025 at 6:43 PM
I wonder why the American Bar Association is referring to them as "state bar associations" in its own FAQ!
He is a member of a "bar association" (lowercase) even if he's not a member of that particular state's Bar Association (uppercase), as you can see for yourself:
August 20, 2025 at 6:30 PM
He is a member of a "bar association" (lowercase) even if he's not a member of that particular state's Bar Association (uppercase), as you can see for yourself:
The Black's Law Dictionary pictures that were mentioned:
August 20, 2025 at 1:36 PM
The Black's Law Dictionary pictures that were mentioned:
What he said when I sent him this additional message of yours:
August 20, 2025 at 1:33 PM
What he said when I sent him this additional message of yours:
His direct reply to this particular message of yours:
August 20, 2025 at 1:31 PM
His direct reply to this particular message of yours:
According to the witnesses from the same group of friends, he didn't do anything:
August 20, 2025 at 10:44 AM
According to the witnesses from the same group of friends, he didn't do anything:
The image he included alongside the text, where he highlighted the first paragraph in Rule 305 of the Illinois Supreme Court Rules, which you can find for yourself here:
ilcourtsaudio.blob.core.windows.net/antilles-res...
ilcourtsaudio.blob.core.windows.net/antilles-res...
August 18, 2025 at 8:41 PM
The image he included alongside the text, where he highlighted the first paragraph in Rule 305 of the Illinois Supreme Court Rules, which you can find for yourself here:
ilcourtsaudio.blob.core.windows.net/antilles-res...
ilcourtsaudio.blob.core.windows.net/antilles-res...
We're going in circles because you seem to only remember the last thing you quoted at any given moment.
Out of curiosity, did you try passing the bar exam? How did that go?
Out of curiosity, did you try passing the bar exam? How did that go?
August 18, 2025 at 8:30 PM
We're going in circles because you seem to only remember the last thing you quoted at any given moment.
Out of curiosity, did you try passing the bar exam? How did that go?
Out of curiosity, did you try passing the bar exam? How did that go?
He is saying it can be construed as both.
It's fortunate that we have this other reply from him where he reiterates that it can be construed as *both* a 6 figure and a 7 figure payment, "depending on your chosen definition".
It's fortunate that we have this other reply from him where he reiterates that it can be construed as *both* a 6 figure and a 7 figure payment, "depending on your chosen definition".
August 18, 2025 at 5:30 PM
He is saying it can be construed as both.
It's fortunate that we have this other reply from him where he reiterates that it can be construed as *both* a 6 figure and a 7 figure payment, "depending on your chosen definition".
It's fortunate that we have this other reply from him where he reiterates that it can be construed as *both* a 6 figure and a 7 figure payment, "depending on your chosen definition".
I remember this differently. I remember someone telling me it depended on your "chosen definition":
August 18, 2025 at 4:45 PM
I remember this differently. I remember someone telling me it depended on your "chosen definition":
So you're trying to say this person was not actually replying to what I was saying?
If so, why were they replying to me, to that particular hypothetical example? They could have replied to someone else.
It seems you're only here to see how far you can take your conversational distortion field.
If so, why were they replying to me, to that particular hypothetical example? They could have replied to someone else.
It seems you're only here to see how far you can take your conversational distortion field.
August 18, 2025 at 3:28 PM
So you're trying to say this person was not actually replying to what I was saying?
If so, why were they replying to me, to that particular hypothetical example? They could have replied to someone else.
It seems you're only here to see how far you can take your conversational distortion field.
If so, why were they replying to me, to that particular hypothetical example? They could have replied to someone else.
It seems you're only here to see how far you can take your conversational distortion field.
These two weren't separate scenarios in the conversation.
I provided the example with the 500k paid back and forth and then referred back to it as "a scenario where only $1 changed hands in the end".
Timothy specifically said that the back-and-forth can be construed as a 6 or 7 figure payment.
I provided the example with the 500k paid back and forth and then referred back to it as "a scenario where only $1 changed hands in the end".
Timothy specifically said that the back-and-forth can be construed as a 6 or 7 figure payment.
August 18, 2025 at 3:06 PM
These two weren't separate scenarios in the conversation.
I provided the example with the 500k paid back and forth and then referred back to it as "a scenario where only $1 changed hands in the end".
Timothy specifically said that the back-and-forth can be construed as a 6 or 7 figure payment.
I provided the example with the 500k paid back and forth and then referred back to it as "a scenario where only $1 changed hands in the end".
Timothy specifically said that the back-and-forth can be construed as a 6 or 7 figure payment.