So many reasons, but this one is top 3.

Inductive inference is necessarily less certain than deductive inference. Deduction is less powerful than abductive inference. And who knows whether those three are enough to describe "reasoning," which is x-species?

Using stats to simulate deduction while claiming abduction is just... vaporware.

Are you saying that if I flip a coin and it chooses the same moral decision that a human does, that the coin doesn't have a system of moral decision making?

They just don't make chiefs of staff like they used to.

There's a huge Dunning-Kruger problem with the whole "clear and coherent" requirement.

Theres just gotta be a way for Zuck to keep all his money and still solve climate change and fusion energy and people will think he's a good guy.

Try Llama again. TRY IT AGAIN.

They still don't think they've got enough guys with Eddie Van Halen t-shirts to throw that first molotov cocktail.