@davidkersey.bsky.social
That sucks.
I think extending to the westside is a good idea but an eventual Bronx extension is also something I had hoped to see eventually.
I think extending to the westside is a good idea but an eventual Bronx extension is also something I had hoped to see eventually.
January 13, 2026 at 3:47 PM
That sucks.
I think extending to the westside is a good idea but an eventual Bronx extension is also something I had hoped to see eventually.
I think extending to the westside is a good idea but an eventual Bronx extension is also something I had hoped to see eventually.
Sorry I missed that. I guess I should have a second coffee
January 13, 2026 at 3:20 PM
Sorry I missed that. I guess I should have a second coffee
The screenshot says that the new revised plans bell mouth still allows for an extension to the Bronx. I do not see how this,”fucks over the Bronx”
January 13, 2026 at 2:57 PM
The screenshot says that the new revised plans bell mouth still allows for an extension to the Bronx. I do not see how this,”fucks over the Bronx”
Reposted
A single phone call asking a city council member or state legislator to vote your way on a specific legislative proposal has *significantly* more political impact than a social media post with 1,000 shares.
December 16, 2025 at 12:09 AM
A single phone call asking a city council member or state legislator to vote your way on a specific legislative proposal has *significantly* more political impact than a social media post with 1,000 shares.
I have had the same issue using Apple Pay.
November 25, 2025 at 6:52 PM
I have had the same issue using Apple Pay.
Yes but that testing doesn’t need to happen in California it could happen at the Pueblo test track.
July 17, 2025 at 5:38 PM
Yes but that testing doesn’t need to happen in California it could happen at the Pueblo test track.
I get that it wouldn’t have passed. I get that it is a more complicated section to build. I am not disputing that. And despite that I still think it would have been a better project for the first segment of an eventual statewide HSR network. But it’s just my opinion and I could be wrong
July 17, 2025 at 4:51 PM
I get that it wouldn’t have passed. I get that it is a more complicated section to build. I am not disputing that. And despite that I still think it would have been a better project for the first segment of an eventual statewide HSR network. But it’s just my opinion and I could be wrong
High speed trains are proven technology I don’t think the first line segment needed to be able to run absolute top speed to “test” trains. I accept that there were political restrictions that shaped the choices that were made. In an ideal world I think LA-SD should have been phase 1.
July 17, 2025 at 4:43 PM
High speed trains are proven technology I don’t think the first line segment needed to be able to run absolute top speed to “test” trains. I accept that there were political restrictions that shaped the choices that were made. In an ideal world I think LA-SD should have been phase 1.
LA to SD is a stronger demand pair and the Surfliner probably needs a replacement anyways so I think it would have been smarter to start there. But at this point it’s too late and the state should just commit to finding the project itself imo
July 17, 2025 at 4:35 PM
LA to SD is a stronger demand pair and the Surfliner probably needs a replacement anyways so I think it would have been smarter to start there. But at this point it’s too late and the state should just commit to finding the project itself imo