David R.
@davidrny.bsky.social
Army Vet. Lawyer. Let’s Go Mets.
Seeing red? Seriously am new York?
January 29, 2026 at 11:42 AM
Seeing red? Seriously am new York?
Love that the NY times won't just say what this is. An attempt to find justification to cancel the midterms.
January 29, 2026 at 11:04 AM
Love that the NY times won't just say what this is. An attempt to find justification to cancel the midterms.
After looking more into it, lujan is just a really cringe and weird e-girl. I can't judge because that's what the kids like these days. Based on what I could find, she was disciplined for her videos and now posts less content in her uniform, and when she does it's really vague.
January 29, 2026 at 11:02 AM
After looking more into it, lujan is just a really cringe and weird e-girl. I can't judge because that's what the kids like these days. Based on what I could find, she was disciplined for her videos and now posts less content in her uniform, and when she does it's really vague.
As a former US army psyop soldier, I wouldn't be surprised if these "influencers" are AI women.
January 29, 2026 at 10:51 AM
As a former US army psyop soldier, I wouldn't be surprised if these "influencers" are AI women.
So? Him being angry at fascists a week earlier means it's ok to execute him a week later? Is that your point NYTimes? This newspaper never fails to defend the trump admins positions.
January 29, 2026 at 10:48 AM
So? Him being angry at fascists a week earlier means it's ok to execute him a week later? Is that your point NYTimes? This newspaper never fails to defend the trump admins positions.
It's only "unclear" if you're an idiot. And it's not nonsense. It's historical fact. When the Dems are in full power, no progress is made because Republicans block everything. When Republicans are in full power, they can do what they want because the Dems never oppose.
January 29, 2026 at 10:47 AM
It's only "unclear" if you're an idiot. And it's not nonsense. It's historical fact. When the Dems are in full power, no progress is made because Republicans block everything. When Republicans are in full power, they can do what they want because the Dems never oppose.
If they were actually committing legit law enforcement operations why would they be worried about being doxxed? You would only have to worry about that if the thing you're doing is deeply unpopular and unwelcome.
January 28, 2026 at 11:29 PM
If they were actually committing legit law enforcement operations why would they be worried about being doxxed? You would only have to worry about that if the thing you're doing is deeply unpopular and unwelcome.
Chuck Schumer always folds.
January 28, 2026 at 8:37 PM
Chuck Schumer always folds.
Why? To terrorize the community? There is no law enforcement purpose for this.
January 28, 2026 at 8:00 PM
Why? To terrorize the community? There is no law enforcement purpose for this.
It's entirely pedantic. There is no confusion as to what was meant.
January 28, 2026 at 7:53 PM
It's entirely pedantic. There is no confusion as to what was meant.
People are just really frustrated with this frail and feeble Democrat "opposition". So far, Dems have caved on everything. People are starting to realize that when Dems control all 3 chambers Republicans are able to block everything. But when GOP controls all 3 Dems can do nothing at all.
January 28, 2026 at 7:28 PM
People are just really frustrated with this frail and feeble Democrat "opposition". So far, Dems have caved on everything. People are starting to realize that when Dems control all 3 chambers Republicans are able to block everything. But when GOP controls all 3 Dems can do nothing at all.
I wish I could get back into reading. I used to be a big reader, but it feels like the ADHD era prevents me from getting back. Do you have any tips for sticking to it?
December 29, 2025 at 5:00 PM
I wish I could get back into reading. I used to be a big reader, but it feels like the ADHD era prevents me from getting back. Do you have any tips for sticking to it?
Breaking news: professional propagandists promote propaganda
October 29, 2025 at 1:15 PM
Breaking news: professional propagandists promote propaganda
80% ? it’s entirely a maga echo chamber. I opened it and the first thing I saw was a post with a million views saying that the no kings protest is obviously funded by soros because the protest featured a giant piece of paper with words on it.
October 21, 2025 at 5:25 PM
80% ? it’s entirely a maga echo chamber. I opened it and the first thing I saw was a post with a million views saying that the no kings protest is obviously funded by soros because the protest featured a giant piece of paper with words on it.
The pro-pedophilia party strikes again.
July 15, 2025 at 6:30 PM
The pro-pedophilia party strikes again.
Oh come on. The democrats definitely did not release the file. The democrats are just as crooked as the republicans. The democrats just barely disguise it better.
July 15, 2025 at 1:43 PM
Oh come on. The democrats definitely did not release the file. The democrats are just as crooked as the republicans. The democrats just barely disguise it better.
Five years? She’s the face now.
July 15, 2025 at 1:12 PM
Five years? She’s the face now.
Reposted by David R.
This is Young Kim (R-CA). If she votes for this bill,
31,315 of her constituents would lose access to their healthcare.
14,993 of her constituents could lose access to their food assistance.
31,315 of her constituents would lose access to their healthcare.
14,993 of her constituents could lose access to their food assistance.
July 2, 2025 at 7:38 PM
This is Young Kim (R-CA). If she votes for this bill,
31,315 of her constituents would lose access to their healthcare.
14,993 of her constituents could lose access to their food assistance.
31,315 of her constituents would lose access to their healthcare.
14,993 of her constituents could lose access to their food assistance.
Reposted by David R.
This is David Valadao (R-CA). If he votes for this bill,
65,140 of his constituents would lose access to their healthcare.
60,580 of his constituents could lose access to their food assistance.
3,612 energy jobs in his district could be lost.
65,140 of his constituents would lose access to their healthcare.
60,580 of his constituents could lose access to their food assistance.
3,612 energy jobs in his district could be lost.
July 2, 2025 at 7:38 PM
This is David Valadao (R-CA). If he votes for this bill,
65,140 of his constituents would lose access to their healthcare.
60,580 of his constituents could lose access to their food assistance.
3,612 energy jobs in his district could be lost.
65,140 of his constituents would lose access to their healthcare.
60,580 of his constituents could lose access to their food assistance.
3,612 energy jobs in his district could be lost.
Reposted by David R.
This is Juan Ciscomani (R-AZ). If he votes for this bill,
31,925 of his constituents would lose access to their healthcare.
29,865 of his constituents could lose access to their food assistance.
4,520 energy jobs in his district could be lost.
31,925 of his constituents would lose access to their healthcare.
29,865 of his constituents could lose access to their food assistance.
4,520 energy jobs in his district could be lost.
July 2, 2025 at 7:38 PM
This is Juan Ciscomani (R-AZ). If he votes for this bill,
31,925 of his constituents would lose access to their healthcare.
29,865 of his constituents could lose access to their food assistance.
4,520 energy jobs in his district could be lost.
31,925 of his constituents would lose access to their healthcare.
29,865 of his constituents could lose access to their food assistance.
4,520 energy jobs in his district could be lost.
Reposted by David R.
This is David Schweikert (R-AZ). If he votes for this bill,
31,400 of his constituents would lose access to their healthcare.
18,700 households could lose access to their food assistance.
31,400 of his constituents would lose access to their healthcare.
18,700 households could lose access to their food assistance.
July 2, 2025 at 7:38 PM
This is David Schweikert (R-AZ). If he votes for this bill,
31,400 of his constituents would lose access to their healthcare.
18,700 households could lose access to their food assistance.
31,400 of his constituents would lose access to their healthcare.
18,700 households could lose access to their food assistance.
Reposted by David R.
This is Derrick Van Orden (R-WI). If he votes for this bill,
32,669 of his constituents would lose access to healthcare.
34,393 of his constituents could lose access to their food assistance.
1,808 energy jobs in his district could be lost.
At least 1 rural hospital in his district could close.
32,669 of his constituents would lose access to healthcare.
34,393 of his constituents could lose access to their food assistance.
1,808 energy jobs in his district could be lost.
At least 1 rural hospital in his district could close.
July 2, 2025 at 7:38 PM
This is Derrick Van Orden (R-WI). If he votes for this bill,
32,669 of his constituents would lose access to healthcare.
34,393 of his constituents could lose access to their food assistance.
1,808 energy jobs in his district could be lost.
At least 1 rural hospital in his district could close.
32,669 of his constituents would lose access to healthcare.
34,393 of his constituents could lose access to their food assistance.
1,808 energy jobs in his district could be lost.
At least 1 rural hospital in his district could close.
Because they don’t give a fuck about their constituents. Come on.
July 1, 2025 at 6:36 PM
Because they don’t give a fuck about their constituents. Come on.