we’re definitely teetering on the precipice. here’s what to watch for:
(and yes, I know, AI bad—but it kept things more succinct than trying to writing that all out on here.)
we’re definitely teetering on the precipice. here’s what to watch for:
(and yes, I know, AI bad—but it kept things more succinct than trying to writing that all out on here.)
maybe WWIII *is* edging closer but unless it’s here already, maybe this rhetoric does more harm than good.
@dailymailpolitics.bsky.social
maybe WWIII *is* edging closer but unless it’s here already, maybe this rhetoric does more harm than good.
@dailymailpolitics.bsky.social
well yeah, much like how this EO from February is unconstitutional, but no one stopped this lunacy back then, either…
well yeah, much like how this EO from February is unconstitutional, but no one stopped this lunacy back then, either…
this merges “protests” and “violence” into a single threat, and, more terrifyingly, asserts that, if these protests inhibit law enforcement, they are rebellion.
STAY LOUD. BE SAFE.
this merges “protests” and “violence” into a single threat, and, more terrifyingly, asserts that, if these protests inhibit law enforcement, they are rebellion.
STAY LOUD. BE SAFE.
it wasn’t a “no”.
so…when?
it wasn’t a “no”.
so…when?
this guy:
this guy:
that includes the Insurrection Act, not Martial Law.
that includes the Insurrection Act, not Martial Law.
the text doesn’t say we get to know what the report says right away—only that they “shall submit a joint report to the President”.
a yes could be on his desk. we just won’t know until we do.
the text doesn’t say we get to know what the report says right away—only that they “shall submit a joint report to the President”.
a yes could be on his desk. we just won’t know until we do.
the due date for whether or not the Insurrection Act is enacted does NOT fall on April 20th, it’s APRIL 19th!!
PLEASE SHARE
the due date for whether or not the Insurrection Act is enacted does NOT fall on April 20th, it’s APRIL 19th!!
PLEASE SHARE
basically, 47 asked Congress for a bill to “get tough on repeat offenders”, and ALSO further protection for law enforcement officials, so they can “do their jobs without their lives being destroyed”.
sounds more like giving cops further criminal freedoms if you ask me
basically, 47 asked Congress for a bill to “get tough on repeat offenders”, and ALSO further protection for law enforcement officials, so they can “do their jobs without their lives being destroyed”.
sounds more like giving cops further criminal freedoms if you ask me
with the SoD and SoJ being Pete Hegseth and Pamela Bondi respectively, the assumption is that they’re unlikely to say no.
www.whitehouse.gov/presidential...
with the SoD and SoJ being Pete Hegseth and Pamela Bondi respectively, the assumption is that they’re unlikely to say no.
www.whitehouse.gov/presidential...