It's actually a war crime (on science) for @hankgreen.bsky.social to not come on GM Skeptic's channel to discuss this book.

This can't hurt me because I didn't watch this when I was 5.

What a weirdo.

Is this not a threat to use nuclear weapons against Hamas?

You're wrong, that's actually a Pokemon and I'm superior to you.

(Genre: boldly wrong and self-aggrandizing)

I do genuinely think that a full primary would have led to a different general election outcome. Whether it meant she had more time to build a case, or someone else came on top, the trend was made much worse by the last-second reappointment of Kamala on the top of the ticket.

The polls were overall pretty darn accurate though. Which states were decided by a margin greater than ±3% of the aggregate of polling?

This is like the scene where Michael Scott screams "I DECLARE BANKRUPTCY" and thinks that's what it takes to make it happen.

Yeah, that's fair

👏🏼

By what metric is Garland a "corporate Dem"? Jack Smith, who was actively prosecuting among the strongest cases against Trump?

And you get that Kamala "prosecuting the case against Trump" is entirely rhetorical, right? The DNC isn't a court and even a president wouldn't be a prosecutor.

This doesn't really make much sense, given most elected officials have no prosecutorial power...

Do you mind providing an example?

This is one of literally two jobs the Fed has, how can it be so bad at this?

Sorry, that was just a cynical retort given that for the past 8 years if you made any comparison between how they act or speak your critique would be diminished to "calling him Hitler" which conservatives use to completely disengage from the substance. Carry on.

Are you calling him literally Hitler??

Yes

100% if someone isn't willing to vote for a gay guy, they weren't going to vote for a Democrat, period.

Pete 2020 😭