@deadspatula.bsky.social
I will add, of the ststes likely to go to harris, all but one went to harris. Of the states expected to go trump, all but one went to trump, of the battleground states we’d expect to see fraud in, harris got over 40% in every one.
January 23, 2026 at 3:51 AM
Having reviewed the results linked by another commentor, as well as AP and Fox news results, I can find no state with less than 25% of the statewide vote for Harris. You have fallen victim to lies. The same lies that poisoned maga to spend 750K on a worthless statistical analysis.
January 23, 2026 at 3:48 AM
because what trump supporters were looking for in 2020 is what dems would have been looking for in 2024, and there just isn't any evidence of that type of voter fraud in the quantitites neccisary to flip the election.
January 22, 2026 at 6:15 PM
I'm not going to Nuremburg children. These are adults who understand the consequences of their actions and want those consequences. They deserve Nuremburg, and they deserve John Woods. But if you'd prefer to infantilize discount Himmler, have fun with that.
January 22, 2026 at 4:40 PM
They do not care about long term impacts. Those who care about money are busy raiding the treasury and offshoring assets. Those who care about control want us to abandon the international concerns because an isolationist country is easier to control. Trump provides cover.
January 22, 2026 at 3:13 PM
Don't do that. There are absolutely adults in the room. They've slowly pulled themselves from the fringes into power by slow deliberate effort, and they are doing what they have always said they were going to do.
They won't invoke the 25th because Trumps erratic behavior serves their ends. 1/
January 22, 2026 at 3:13 PM
I disagree, as would existing precedent, that the 1st amendment protections for free speech result in the post facto claim of a threat on your life establishes that your life was threatened.

The current standard for incitement is trash and disconnected from realities of national and global media.
January 20, 2026 at 11:48 PM
You'd think if it was such an obvious move you'd at least know the predicate actions performed by one justice, let alone the minimum of 3 you'd need to change the vote math.
January 19, 2026 at 5:59 PM
ONe of the major policies to implement is to dissolve ICE and rebuild it around different policy objectives, just like when ICE first formed. The bridge is broken, rebuilding the agency relies on first clearing away the rubble of the 9/11-inspired mistakes made at its creation for a solid foundation
January 14, 2026 at 11:04 PM
I am calling for a complete reorginization. ICE is a flawed agency built on the back of post 9/11 xenophobia whose core mission treats immigrants as threats, which is why trade and asylum are now part of the national security services (DHS), instead of the legal arm of the executive (DOJ). 1/
January 14, 2026 at 11:04 PM
And its not something that happens under trump, because you are right, it just gets hijacked under his executive. Its a completely different policy fight to shift executive power. But the goal is to build an agency that quits/is fired rather than execute the will of a corrupt executive.
January 14, 2026 at 6:50 PM
Abolish ICE, much like defund the police, was about ripping out leadership so when you rebuild, you can build an organization with Policies that are enforced and community oriented. Abolish ICE is a slogan support the major policy shifts, not in leiu of the policy shift as you frame it.
January 14, 2026 at 6:50 PM
You've strawmanned the argument here. Decades of Reform efforts provides significant data that policy changes don't work when unsupported by leadership. and support for the old policies (along with the corruption) is what got leadership where it is.
January 14, 2026 at 6:50 PM
I'd be interested in you actually laying out the specific charge and the actions you think support sedition charges against 3 or more justices.
January 13, 2026 at 6:20 PM
Which crime investigated by Jack smith do you assume SCOTUS would not have extended the immunity decision to?
January 13, 2026 at 5:43 PM
I really dont think he was being overly vague in his refrences to what the Nazis on X are doing with the sex abuse generator named Grok and images of the woman famously shot by ICE.
January 9, 2026 at 8:41 PM
And from that framework, I don't see the mental health impacts of AI use in a professional setting as a meaningful area of study on the basis of the abuse of AI in Law practice when we don't understand the mental health impacts of AI use generally.
January 9, 2026 at 5:26 PM
I think my point is these lawyers were never doing the work, and the sign of worsening mental health cuased by ai use is actually simply exposing people who never would have reviewed the work properly. Their review of AI work is the same review they put into paralegal work. 1/
January 9, 2026 at 5:26 PM
I think the legal profession is insanely overworked and perverse financial incentives (student loans) result in volume being prioritized over quality, and the AI boom is just exposing the rotten underbelly of a lot of legal practice. The mental health damage comes from the profession, not the AI.
January 9, 2026 at 4:46 PM
I expect I lost you because my assumptions changed after the meme author stepped in, and that wasn't well communicated.
January 9, 2026 at 4:15 PM
And given you expressed similar sentiment when you complained the meme doesn't represent your beliefs, Im confused why you think the meme author was working from an objective persepctive on the meaning of libertarianism.
January 9, 2026 at 4:13 PM
I don't largely disagree with you, Emily, on the broader meaning of libertarian or that we can understand the compass. I don't think the meme author agrees, or if he does agree he cared more about publishing quippy material than considering the flaws in his approach. 4/
January 9, 2026 at 4:13 PM
The meme makes entire sense to me when it treats the US libertarian party, which historically caucuses with the GOP and is criticized for centrism, as the entirety of the libertarian ideology. I don't think the author understands LL and its weird you've defended his understanding 3/
January 9, 2026 at 4:13 PM
The meme author has since come in and clarified that he wasn't clever enough to create a genuine response from political ideology, And just put something there. I thought that answered your complaints, I pointed out i disagreed with his compass thinking that was the end of it. 2/
January 9, 2026 at 4:13 PM
Youd requested I not care about the labels themselves and instead act like we all know what the four quadrents mean, And I pointed out the person who did the labeling might face unconcious bias, resulting in your claims that the meme misrepresents The politically left/economically left quadrant. 1/
January 9, 2026 at 4:13 PM