Debbie Kennett 🧬🌳
@debbiekennett.bsky.social
830 followers 1K following 120 posts
DNA, genetic genealogy, family history. forensics. Honorary Research Fellow at UCL. All views my own.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Debbie Kennett 🧬🌳
sogorg.bsky.social
#GenHour

🧬 Got a tricky DNA question?
Join @DebbieKennett at our DNA Advice Hour – exclusive to Gold Members.

📅 Fri 26 Sept | 14:00 BST | Online
👉 Submit your questions by 23 Sept!
🔗 portal.sog.org.uk/Ev...

#Genealogy #DNA
debbiekennett.bsky.social
I saw that article yesterday and shared it on Twitter and Facebook. (I don't tend to be very active here.) I'm not sure I agree with some of the author's comments.
debbiekennett.bsky.social
An outstanding, empathetic long-read article on the tragic case of Constance Marten and Mark Gordon. Like the writer I've always wondered why this couple were prosecuted and brought to trial in the first place. Parents who lose a child deserve compassion not punishment. www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v4...
Clair Wills · The Price of Safety: Constance Marten’s Defiance
The trials of Constance Marten and Mark Gordon were held to determine their criminal responsibility for their daughter...
www.lrb.co.uk
debbiekennett.bsky.social
A very interesting interview with Anouk Curry, the producer of the recent highly acclaimed ITV documentary on the Lucy Letby case. youtu.be/xDu0nYfZKz4?... #LucyLetby
Lucy Letby documentary producer: the alternative theories and what happens next | The Daily T
YouTube video by The Telegraph
youtu.be
Reposted by Debbie Kennett 🧬🌳
iandunt.bsky.social
The ITV documentary about Lucy Letby is very good. Old school, public interest broadcasting which assumes the intelligence and the conscience of its audience. Anyone with the slightest interest in the case should watch it.
debbiekennett.bsky.social
So have I. There's nothing wrong with what Shoo Lee. I've had enough of your rudeness. I'm now going to block you. Bye bye.
debbiekennett.bsky.social
What are you on about? He submitted an updated paper which went through the peer review system and was accepted for publication. That's how scientific publication works!
debbiekennett.bsky.social
None of the parents had any suspicions with Letby at the time. All the concerns raised at the trial are done through the lends of hindsight bias and because the parents been told by the police that their child had been murdered. They weren't to know that the police were incompetent .
debbiekennett.bsky.social
I've read the lawyers' responses and it's clear that there's a lot they don't understand They are representing the families very badly by refusing to engage with the new evidence. It's so sad for the families. They deserve the truth.
debbiekennett.bsky.social
Shoo Lee was not instructed by Letby's lawyers. He and the other experts worked pro bono. He was simply enraged by the way his research was misrepresented by Dewi Evans and the CoA judges. You might want to read up on peer review to understand how it works.
debbiekennett.bsky.social
And none of the parents saw any problems at the time. Any self-respecting lawyer would engage with the new evidence but as far as I'm aware the families' lawyers still haven't asked for the reports from the world-leading experts.
debbiekennett.bsky.social
So you're not shocked at the conflict of interest? My heart goes out to those poor parents but they've been gaslit from the start by the police and the lawyers. Some of them had even commenced legal proceedings against the hospital for negligence.
debbiekennett.bsky.social
It's shocking isn't it that such a conflict of interest exists. I tried writing to the Thirlwall Inquiry to alert them but they didn't seem to think it was anything of concern to them and it is was up to the lawyer.
debbiekennett.bsky.social
I've given up trying to debate with him. He resorts to nasty and unwarranted insults. I've now blocked him. He seems to be hijacking lots of threads here. Despite the denials I wonder if he is in fact Dewi Evans.
debbiekennett.bsky.social
The mother says in her Thirlwall testimony that she got her own phone records. The calls to the parents were logged and the mother's times are one hour out with the documentary records.
debbiekennett.bsky.social
This is an excellent briefing paper on the junk science and shoddy statistics used in the Lucy Letby case. It is written by 18 experts, some of whom have not spoken out before. The paper was first published on 1 May 2025. www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/bxrjy...
debbiekennett.bsky.social
The mother requested the data from the phone company and such data is always provided in UTC time. Why are you so rude and making false accusations about people telling lies?
debbiekennett.bsky.social
I should have said GMT+1 (ie British Summer Time). The failure to allow for the clocks changing accounts for the discrepancy.
debbiekennett.bsky.social
You are trolling me. I see no point in engaging with an anonymous account who presumably has a vested interested in upholding the verdict. You need to do your homework and read up on the evidence.
debbiekennett.bsky.social
What evidence? The police had nothing on her at all. I have a paper shredder. It does make me a murderer.
debbiekennett.bsky.social
Can you seriously support a doctor who thinks it's possibly to kill a baby with "a dollop of air"?
debbiekennett.bsky.social
No she didn't. The mother obtained the phone records from the phone company but the police failed to convert the time from UTC to GMT. As a result, the mother's times are out by an hour. Everyone else's testimony fits if the times are corrected.