Penelope the Deerling
banner
deerlingdoe.bsky.social
Penelope the Deerling
@deerlingdoe.bsky.social
🔞⚠️ The next person going "AcTuAlLy AcEs StIlL FuCk" on a post about ace erasure gets sent to the shark pit 🥰 | 30+ Asexual | I write sometime
Currently playing : Powerwash simulator
Currently reading : Skandar Smith Saga ( AF Steadman )
Dreams do come true 😳
December 21, 2025 at 1:36 PM
My wish is that by opening this door, people realize just how fucked we treat animals as a whole, and start making some personal changes that go beyond easy internet points.
December 5, 2025 at 2:52 PM
where meat alternatives are almost non-existent. Now if someone calls out the lifecast practice and then also condemns animal exploitation as a whole, I can respect that way more than someone who condemns EE but in the same breath DEFENDS the farming industry.
December 5, 2025 at 2:49 PM
Now don't get me wrong, I am not delusional enough to think we can all be vegan. Hell, I still consume meat and fish on occasion myself, though I try to stick to wild game. I know that not everyone can just pick up a rifle and start hunting their own food, and I've seen places where ->
December 5, 2025 at 2:49 PM
would force them to actually change some things about their lifestyle. We can all agree it is easier to just post outrage on social media about a niche issue and ignore the rest.
December 5, 2025 at 2:48 PM
then pat yourself on the back for your animal activism and go on about your daily life. Widening the conversation, caring about animal welfare past this, admitting that the farming industry also relies on what, in their own words, is animal molestation and sexual exploitation ->
December 5, 2025 at 2:47 PM
When you think about it, it does make sense. Widening the conversation would force people to look at some uncomfortable truths, like what we are condoning through our choices as consumers. It's much easier to post outrage at a company you ( general you, not you personally ) already don't buy from ->
December 5, 2025 at 2:47 PM
the horrors of industries relying on the sexual and overall exploitation of animals ( farming, equestrian sports, even some zoos ) yet people only seem to care in this one particular instance, and then defend the others as if their grandma was held hostage. ->
December 5, 2025 at 2:46 PM
There can be no cherry picking when we consider sexually exploiting animals reprehensible or not. In my perfect world, there would be no animal exploitation, and the only time people would handle animal junks would be for medical reasons. Trust me I would LOVE to have a wider conversation about ->
December 5, 2025 at 2:45 PM
A lot of people seem to think the intent here is what makes it reprehensible but I disagree. I think we need to decide if handling animal junks and sexually stimulating them for capitalistic gains is animal molestation or not. And if it is, then all of it is. ->
December 5, 2025 at 2:45 PM
other than “it's different!!” or mostly “EE does it for sexual reasons!” While I agree the intent is different, the act in itself of “sexually exploiting” animals is the same. I highly doubt the animal getting its junk handled thinks “thank God they're doing this to make burgers and not a dildo”. ->
December 5, 2025 at 2:44 PM
that rely on animal exploitation. Which most of the EE detractors shut down. Even more hypocritical in my opinion, a lot of them actually defend the other industries, even though they would essentially rely on the same sexual exploitation they accuse EE of. And I've seen no argument for that ->
December 5, 2025 at 2:43 PM
I will answer this one as it is the closest to my own point. But see, I agree with you, and I've already said most of what follows in various threads. I don't think we should be exploiting animals, no matter the industry. I am begging people to open up this discussion to other industries ->
December 5, 2025 at 2:42 PM
and even defend the farming industry, because admitting that the same definition should apply there means they'd need to make some drastic lifestyle changes they're not willing to undergo.
December 4, 2025 at 4:55 PM
I was just thinking that. It really feels like they only care about animal welfare in this specific instance because it's easy to boycott a company you already don't buy from. They won't admit that their definition of animal molestation should then also apply to the farming industry -->
December 4, 2025 at 4:48 PM
Cherry picking when a horse getting jerked off to make money out of is reprehensible and when it's perfectly fine, especially if the methods are the same, is hypocritical at best.
December 4, 2025 at 8:45 AM
When I pointed it out someone said that when it's done for agricultural/breeding purposes it's for "the wellbeing of the animal" like bro be so for real. Either we consider the act of handling animal junks and sexually stimulating them for capitalistic reasons reprehensible or we don't.
December 4, 2025 at 8:36 AM
That's always what gets me. The people outraged at EE will then make a 180 and tell you that what they, by their own words, consider animal molestation is suddenly perfectly okay if the goal is to forcefully breed them or eat them later on.
December 4, 2025 at 8:30 AM
100% the reason. I've seen people making BOMB THREATS. If this was about their practice, MFF wouldn't have let them deal there for 15+ years. It's not like they were hiding the lifecasts all this time.
December 4, 2025 at 7:48 AM
Their argument is ALWAYS "Yeah but EE does it to make dildos, it's gross!" like...so is "molesting animals" okay as long as it's for the purpose of eating them later on? Alright then...

I saw some call for OTHERS to go and attack the EE booth. Jfc.
December 1, 2025 at 9:12 PM
From semen collecting to artificial inseminations to pregnancy checks, a lot of our meat/milk wouldn't be accessible without humans engaging in what is essentially "sexual acts" with animals. Yet they're fine with a bull getting jerked off for semen or a cow getting an arm shoved up its ass.
December 1, 2025 at 8:46 PM