Imagine what happens when they swim into a tornado!

I agree.

But the fact that attacking the boat was a criminal act doesn't change the also fact that it really doesn't look like a fishing boat

These are two different, independent aspects.

vorgelegt habe. Ob die Umsetzung des Feedbacks der Grund war, dass ich akzeptiert wurde sei aber mal dahingestellt 😆

Bei uns gab es gestern eine Präsentation zum neuesten Feature in Slack... AI summary.

Bin ja wirklich Mal gespannt, wie gut das funktioniert. Hilfreich wäre es allemal.

Und ehrlicherweise war ich positiv überrascht, als ich ChatGPT und Bing/Copilot meinen Input für eine Konferenz zum Review...

The one hit with the double strike doesn't necessarily look like a fishing boat.

Too bad we won't ever find out who was on that boat and why.

War with Venezuela ...
or some dog ate the Epstein files, but luckily Noem shot the dog right afterwards.

You understand that the minority doesn't have any say in official "hearings"?

Sure, they can invite some journalists to some conference room and talk ... but that isn't a hearing.

Without the majority, there is NO leverage. No subpoenas, no nothing.

Please elaborate.

What reaction would you have expected from a party that is in the minority in both chambers of Congress?

There's a reason they are redrawing maps. The question is which force will be more powerful in the end.

Exactly. And pay for it themselves.

Might be better to save that money for campaigning for the midterms.

My thoughts are irrelevant, what matters will be final numbers and the local regulations.

And note, people should really abandon the idea that recounts change outcomes.

Recounts numbers are different by a few dozen or maybe hundred normally.