Defund ABC
@defundabc.bsky.social
Why are Australians FORCED to pay for ABC if we don't want it?🤔
The information from ABC is so bad and misleading it should be embarrassing; their content is just for the low IQ, and I will show you why via math.
Preference vote #1 for minor parties
The information from ABC is so bad and misleading it should be embarrassing; their content is just for the low IQ, and I will show you why via math.
Preference vote #1 for minor parties
Reposted by Defund ABC
Here is the total cost of powering Australia with nuclear vs wind or solar renewables according to both ChatGPT and Grok, using the same question based on real-world project costings:
The math is perfect, both AIs can't be wrong?
chatgpt.com/share/67e000...
x.com/i/grok/share...
The math is perfect, both AIs can't be wrong?
chatgpt.com/share/67e000...
x.com/i/grok/share...
March 24, 2025 at 2:13 PM
Here is the total cost of powering Australia with nuclear vs wind or solar renewables according to both ChatGPT and Grok, using the same question based on real-world project costings:
The math is perfect, both AIs can't be wrong?
chatgpt.com/share/67e000...
x.com/i/grok/share...
The math is perfect, both AIs can't be wrong?
chatgpt.com/share/67e000...
x.com/i/grok/share...
Here is the total cost of powering Australia with nuclear vs wind or solar renewables according to both ChatGPT and Grok, using the same question based on real-world project costings:
The math is perfect, both AIs can't be wrong?
chatgpt.com/share/67e000...
x.com/i/grok/share...
The math is perfect, both AIs can't be wrong?
chatgpt.com/share/67e000...
x.com/i/grok/share...
March 24, 2025 at 2:13 PM
Here is the total cost of powering Australia with nuclear vs wind or solar renewables according to both ChatGPT and Grok, using the same question based on real-world project costings:
The math is perfect, both AIs can't be wrong?
chatgpt.com/share/67e000...
x.com/i/grok/share...
The math is perfect, both AIs can't be wrong?
chatgpt.com/share/67e000...
x.com/i/grok/share...
AI models keep getting smarter, and people now use them for everything, including replacing Google searches.
How can you promote renewables when the real world data shows they're about 20 times more expensive than nuclear?
You can't hide from the facts forever. chatgpt.com/share/67b514...
How can you promote renewables when the real world data shows they're about 20 times more expensive than nuclear?
You can't hide from the facts forever. chatgpt.com/share/67b514...
February 18, 2025 at 11:55 PM
AI models keep getting smarter, and people now use them for everything, including replacing Google searches.
How can you promote renewables when the real world data shows they're about 20 times more expensive than nuclear?
You can't hide from the facts forever. chatgpt.com/share/67b514...
How can you promote renewables when the real world data shows they're about 20 times more expensive than nuclear?
You can't hide from the facts forever. chatgpt.com/share/67b514...
AI models keep getting smarter, and people now use them for everything, including replacing Google searches.
How can you promote renewables when data shows they're about 20 times more expensive than nuclear?
You can't hide from the facts forever. chatgpt.com/share/67b514...
How can you promote renewables when data shows they're about 20 times more expensive than nuclear?
You can't hide from the facts forever. chatgpt.com/share/67b514...
February 18, 2025 at 11:54 PM
AI models keep getting smarter, and people now use them for everything, including replacing Google searches.
How can you promote renewables when data shows they're about 20 times more expensive than nuclear?
You can't hide from the facts forever. chatgpt.com/share/67b514...
How can you promote renewables when data shows they're about 20 times more expensive than nuclear?
You can't hide from the facts forever. chatgpt.com/share/67b514...
AI models keep getting smarter, and people now use them for everything, including replacing Google searches.
How can you promote renewables when data shows they're about 20 times more expensive than nuclear?
You can't hide from the facts forever.
chatgpt.com/share/67b514...
How can you promote renewables when data shows they're about 20 times more expensive than nuclear?
You can't hide from the facts forever.
chatgpt.com/share/67b514...
February 18, 2025 at 11:52 PM
AI models keep getting smarter, and people now use them for everything, including replacing Google searches.
How can you promote renewables when data shows they're about 20 times more expensive than nuclear?
You can't hide from the facts forever.
chatgpt.com/share/67b514...
How can you promote renewables when data shows they're about 20 times more expensive than nuclear?
You can't hide from the facts forever.
chatgpt.com/share/67b514...
AI models keep getting smarter, and people now use them for everything, including replacing Google searches.
How can you promote renewables when data shows they're about 20 times more expensive than nuclear? As reflected in people's electricity bills using renewables.
chatgpt.com/share/67b514...
How can you promote renewables when data shows they're about 20 times more expensive than nuclear? As reflected in people's electricity bills using renewables.
chatgpt.com/share/67b514...
February 18, 2025 at 11:49 PM
AI models keep getting smarter, and people now use them for everything, including replacing Google searches.
How can you promote renewables when data shows they're about 20 times more expensive than nuclear? As reflected in people's electricity bills using renewables.
chatgpt.com/share/67b514...
How can you promote renewables when data shows they're about 20 times more expensive than nuclear? As reflected in people's electricity bills using renewables.
chatgpt.com/share/67b514...
But your plans for renewable infrastructure look like a disaster. Any real-world renewables project scaled to power Australia looks terrible compared to nuclear.
How can you keep lying to Australian taxpayers like this?
chatgpt.com/share/67ab2a...
How can you keep lying to Australian taxpayers like this?
chatgpt.com/share/67ab2a...
February 11, 2025 at 12:32 PM
But your plans for renewable infrastructure look like a disaster. Any real-world renewables project scaled to power Australia looks terrible compared to nuclear.
How can you keep lying to Australian taxpayers like this?
chatgpt.com/share/67ab2a...
How can you keep lying to Australian taxpayers like this?
chatgpt.com/share/67ab2a...
But your plans for renewable infrastructure look like a disaster. Any real-world renewables project scaled to power Australia looks terrible compared to nuclear when using any AI modelling tool.
How can you keep lying to Australian taxpayers like this?
chatgpt.com/share/67ab2a...
How can you keep lying to Australian taxpayers like this?
chatgpt.com/share/67ab2a...
February 11, 2025 at 11:03 AM
But your plans for renewable infrastructure look like a disaster. Any real-world renewables project scaled to power Australia looks terrible compared to nuclear when using any AI modelling tool.
How can you keep lying to Australian taxpayers like this?
chatgpt.com/share/67ab2a...
How can you keep lying to Australian taxpayers like this?
chatgpt.com/share/67ab2a...
South Australia already has 400% installed wind/solar capacity, yet still needs to "transition".
Any real-world renewables project scaled to power Australia looks terrible compared to nuclear.
This should be basic common knowledge.
chatgpt.com/share/67ab2a...
Any real-world renewables project scaled to power Australia looks terrible compared to nuclear.
This should be basic common knowledge.
chatgpt.com/share/67ab2a...
February 11, 2025 at 10:59 AM
South Australia already has 400% installed wind/solar capacity, yet still needs to "transition".
Any real-world renewables project scaled to power Australia looks terrible compared to nuclear.
This should be basic common knowledge.
chatgpt.com/share/67ab2a...
Any real-world renewables project scaled to power Australia looks terrible compared to nuclear.
This should be basic common knowledge.
chatgpt.com/share/67ab2a...
I keep comparing different renewable energy projects with the latest AI models, and nuclear keeps coming up 4-5 times cheaper than the best wind/solar projects in the world.
chatgpt.com/share/67a317...
chatgpt.com/share/67a317...
February 5, 2025 at 7:49 AM
I keep comparing different renewable energy projects with the latest AI models, and nuclear keeps coming up 4-5 times cheaper than the best wind/solar projects in the world.
chatgpt.com/share/67a317...
chatgpt.com/share/67a317...
I am willing to have ALL the nuclear waste injected into me.
It's safe. This is real science vs rubbish reports from ABC.
It's safe. This is real science vs rubbish reports from ABC.
January 31, 2025 at 7:08 AM
I am willing to have ALL the nuclear waste injected into me.
It's safe. This is real science vs rubbish reports from ABC.
It's safe. This is real science vs rubbish reports from ABC.
Reposted by Defund ABC
When I use real-world wind or solar projects to power Australia's need of 250TWh annually, I find it costs trillions.
But with nuclear projects, it's as cheap as $150 billion.
Can you explain that?
chatgpt.com/share/6784a9...
But with nuclear projects, it's as cheap as $150 billion.
Can you explain that?
chatgpt.com/share/6784a9...
January 24, 2025 at 5:51 AM
When I use real-world wind or solar projects to power Australia's need of 250TWh annually, I find it costs trillions.
But with nuclear projects, it's as cheap as $150 billion.
Can you explain that?
chatgpt.com/share/6784a9...
But with nuclear projects, it's as cheap as $150 billion.
Can you explain that?
chatgpt.com/share/6784a9...
When I use real-world wind or solar projects to power Australia's need of 250TWh annually, I find it costs trillions.
But with nuclear projects, it's as cheap as $150 billion.
Can you explain that?
chatgpt.com/share/6784a9...
But with nuclear projects, it's as cheap as $150 billion.
Can you explain that?
chatgpt.com/share/6784a9...
January 24, 2025 at 5:51 AM
When I use real-world wind or solar projects to power Australia's need of 250TWh annually, I find it costs trillions.
But with nuclear projects, it's as cheap as $150 billion.
Can you explain that?
chatgpt.com/share/6784a9...
But with nuclear projects, it's as cheap as $150 billion.
Can you explain that?
chatgpt.com/share/6784a9...
When I use real-world wind or solar projects to power Australia, I find it costs trillions.
But with nuclear projects, it's as cheap as $150 billion.
Can you explain that?
chatgpt.com/share/6784a9...
But with nuclear projects, it's as cheap as $150 billion.
Can you explain that?
chatgpt.com/share/6784a9...
January 24, 2025 at 5:47 AM
When I use real-world wind or solar projects to power Australia, I find it costs trillions.
But with nuclear projects, it's as cheap as $150 billion.
Can you explain that?
chatgpt.com/share/6784a9...
But with nuclear projects, it's as cheap as $150 billion.
Can you explain that?
chatgpt.com/share/6784a9...
When I use real-world wind or solar projects to power Australia, I find it costs trillions.
But with nuclear projects, it's as cheap as $150 billion.
Can you explain that?
chatgpt.com/share/6784a9...
But with nuclear projects, it's as cheap as $150 billion.
Can you explain that?
chatgpt.com/share/6784a9...
January 24, 2025 at 5:47 AM
When I use real-world wind or solar projects to power Australia, I find it costs trillions.
But with nuclear projects, it's as cheap as $150 billion.
Can you explain that?
chatgpt.com/share/6784a9...
But with nuclear projects, it's as cheap as $150 billion.
Can you explain that?
chatgpt.com/share/6784a9...
When I use any real world wind or solar project to power Australia I find it costs into the trillions.
But using real world projects with nuclear it's as cheap as $150billion.
Why is that?
chatgpt.com/share/6784a9...
But using real world projects with nuclear it's as cheap as $150billion.
Why is that?
chatgpt.com/share/6784a9...
January 24, 2025 at 5:23 AM
When I use any real world wind or solar project to power Australia I find it costs into the trillions.
But using real world projects with nuclear it's as cheap as $150billion.
Why is that?
chatgpt.com/share/6784a9...
But using real world projects with nuclear it's as cheap as $150billion.
Why is that?
chatgpt.com/share/6784a9...
The aluminium industry could only do better with nuclear added to Australia.
This is a basic IQ test.
Just look at the facts to power Australia via renewables using real world official data/stats.
bsky.app/profile/defu...
This is a basic IQ test.
Just look at the facts to power Australia via renewables using real world official data/stats.
bsky.app/profile/defu...
January 20, 2025 at 4:44 AM
The aluminium industry could only do better with nuclear added to Australia.
This is a basic IQ test.
Just look at the facts to power Australia via renewables using real world official data/stats.
bsky.app/profile/defu...
This is a basic IQ test.
Just look at the facts to power Australia via renewables using real world official data/stats.
bsky.app/profile/defu...
Reposted by Defund ABC
In what world is the "cheapest form of energy" renewables? You can pick any major solar/wind project and see it's insanely expensive over time.
You're fooled by capacity factor; solar and wind only provide about ~25% of their rated power on average and need rebuilding every ~25 years.
☢️60yrs & 90%CF
You're fooled by capacity factor; solar and wind only provide about ~25% of their rated power on average and need rebuilding every ~25 years.
☢️60yrs & 90%CF
January 17, 2025 at 5:22 AM
In what world is the "cheapest form of energy" renewables? You can pick any major solar/wind project and see it's insanely expensive over time.
You're fooled by capacity factor; solar and wind only provide about ~25% of their rated power on average and need rebuilding every ~25 years.
☢️60yrs & 90%CF
You're fooled by capacity factor; solar and wind only provide about ~25% of their rated power on average and need rebuilding every ~25 years.
☢️60yrs & 90%CF
None of those projects are active yet.
South Australia already has 400% wind/solar capacity, has the most expensive electricity in the world, and emits x10 more CO2 than France.
How much renewables do you need before you wake up?
app.electricitymaps.com/zone/AU-SA/72h
South Australia already has 400% wind/solar capacity, has the most expensive electricity in the world, and emits x10 more CO2 than France.
How much renewables do you need before you wake up?
app.electricitymaps.com/zone/AU-SA/72h
Live 24/7 CO₂ emissions of electricity consumption
Electricity Maps is a live 24/7 visualization of where your electricity comes from and how much CO2 was emitted to produce it.
app.electricitymaps.com
January 17, 2025 at 10:55 AM
None of those projects are active yet.
South Australia already has 400% wind/solar capacity, has the most expensive electricity in the world, and emits x10 more CO2 than France.
How much renewables do you need before you wake up?
app.electricitymaps.com/zone/AU-SA/72h
South Australia already has 400% wind/solar capacity, has the most expensive electricity in the world, and emits x10 more CO2 than France.
How much renewables do you need before you wake up?
app.electricitymaps.com/zone/AU-SA/72h
Sounds like you have no idea about nuclear and are rattling off rubbish statements like a child..
90% CF is very easy and common standard for modern nuclear.
www.energy.gov/ne/articles/...
90% CF is very easy and common standard for modern nuclear.
www.energy.gov/ne/articles/...
January 17, 2025 at 6:40 AM
Sounds like you have no idea about nuclear and are rattling off rubbish statements like a child..
90% CF is very easy and common standard for modern nuclear.
www.energy.gov/ne/articles/...
90% CF is very easy and common standard for modern nuclear.
www.energy.gov/ne/articles/...
If it's getting cheaper and viable then why are there less and less large solar farms being built.
There basically isn't anything like the Topaz Solar farm being built again in first world countries like USA.
All other solar projects had their costs hidden.
There basically isn't anything like the Topaz Solar farm being built again in first world countries like USA.
All other solar projects had their costs hidden.
January 17, 2025 at 6:37 AM
If it's getting cheaper and viable then why are there less and less large solar farms being built.
There basically isn't anything like the Topaz Solar farm being built again in first world countries like USA.
All other solar projects had their costs hidden.
There basically isn't anything like the Topaz Solar farm being built again in first world countries like USA.
All other solar projects had their costs hidden.
Nuclear reactors can go over 1 year without refueling. They are generally expected to achieve a 90% capacity factor over multiple years.
Using renewables' unfair data methodology, they would rate it as 100% capacity factor.
Using renewables' unfair data methodology, they would rate it as 100% capacity factor.
January 17, 2025 at 6:29 AM
Nuclear reactors can go over 1 year without refueling. They are generally expected to achieve a 90% capacity factor over multiple years.
Using renewables' unfair data methodology, they would rate it as 100% capacity factor.
Using renewables' unfair data methodology, they would rate it as 100% capacity factor.
In what world is the "cheapest form of energy" renewables? You can pick any major solar/wind project and see it's insanely expensive over time.
You're fooled by capacity factor; solar and wind only provide about ~25% of their rated power on average and need rebuilding every ~25 years.
☢️60yrs & 90%CF
You're fooled by capacity factor; solar and wind only provide about ~25% of their rated power on average and need rebuilding every ~25 years.
☢️60yrs & 90%CF
January 17, 2025 at 5:22 AM
In what world is the "cheapest form of energy" renewables? You can pick any major solar/wind project and see it's insanely expensive over time.
You're fooled by capacity factor; solar and wind only provide about ~25% of their rated power on average and need rebuilding every ~25 years.
☢️60yrs & 90%CF
You're fooled by capacity factor; solar and wind only provide about ~25% of their rated power on average and need rebuilding every ~25 years.
☢️60yrs & 90%CF
You can select any large solar project in the world that has all it's costs and annual TWh listed and documented.
You will find the cost is similar ball park no matter what renewables project you select.
What confuses low IQ people is just how little power is generated by renewables to match ☢️
You will find the cost is similar ball park no matter what renewables project you select.
What confuses low IQ people is just how little power is generated by renewables to match ☢️
January 16, 2025 at 2:31 PM
You can select any large solar project in the world that has all it's costs and annual TWh listed and documented.
You will find the cost is similar ball park no matter what renewables project you select.
What confuses low IQ people is just how little power is generated by renewables to match ☢️
You will find the cost is similar ball park no matter what renewables project you select.
What confuses low IQ people is just how little power is generated by renewables to match ☢️
That would be broadcast TV for most people, still.
That is why you guys are so clueless on the basic facts on renewables.
You have never actually looked up the basic costs of renewables and what it requires to generate Australia's annual 250TWh
Basic 101 stuff, due to trusting TV.
That is why you guys are so clueless on the basic facts on renewables.
You have never actually looked up the basic costs of renewables and what it requires to generate Australia's annual 250TWh
Basic 101 stuff, due to trusting TV.
January 16, 2025 at 2:15 PM
That would be broadcast TV for most people, still.
That is why you guys are so clueless on the basic facts on renewables.
You have never actually looked up the basic costs of renewables and what it requires to generate Australia's annual 250TWh
Basic 101 stuff, due to trusting TV.
That is why you guys are so clueless on the basic facts on renewables.
You have never actually looked up the basic costs of renewables and what it requires to generate Australia's annual 250TWh
Basic 101 stuff, due to trusting TV.