I told myself, well, but they’re so, they’re such subtle texts…they’re not too subtle for you, but they are… Myself, I derive something from them, I derive something quite succinct.

Good. So, listen, I’m trying to tell you, I’m trying to tell you this story, but without sticking to a single author, because I could have tried telling you about Böhme, tried telling you about Schelling, all that.

including your intimate relationships, your most personal relationships, when they say “tell me a something”, you immediately understand that the only thing we can experience, feel or see are clichés that are in us no less than everywhere else.

when they said: “I am not allowed to speak”. It is in this sense that I was saying, but after all, if you think of the number of situations and social forces that force you to speak in life, whoever you are,

And what do we hear on the radio? Or on television, what do we see every day? And the more live, the more pathetic it is. We see people, when they are invited to speak, pronouncing the very clichés they were protesting against

But what they have to say – and I say this all the more because I experience it myself, except in exceptional cases, except when I’m well prepared – what do you or I have to say? If not precisely the very clichés we complain about and that are imposed on us when we don’t speak.

They are physical forces. People are told, “Speak! Speak up! Go ahead and speak! Express yourself!” And you see how terrible this is when it’s live. “Go ahead and speak on air!” On air.

simply it is when the chance would occur or arise for an alliance between the exploited Third World and a class of workers in the center, which would no longer be exactly caught within the wage system.

this has been the whole social-democratic tendency, it has been, well, it has a long history, in Europe and in America. A revolutionary connection, as opposed to an axiomatic conjugation or conjunction, would be like movement… not the reverse, it is not logical movements;

And I would say: the way in which the Western European and American proletariat has been determined to participate actively in the exploitation, this is precisely the case of an axiomatic conjunction. This has been, by dint of making axioms for the working class, etc.,

since unions managed the interests of a European proletariat that had completely resigned himself. Look at a very interesting book, for example, in this regard: how the American proletariat was caught up in a very active participation in the Vietnam War…

… the armaments industry, … or yet still under more direct forms. But the compromise of the European proletariat in the exploitation of the Third World is a fact which explains precisely everything that all this time has caused us a problem concerning the attitude of the unions forever,

namely the European proletariat of the center was caught precisely within an axiomatic system, which meant that, whether you prefer it or not, and more and more preferably, it actively participated in the exploitation of the center, either because,

The great accomplishment realized by recent capitalism, since the Russian Revolution, was, of course, the integration of the European proletariat into the enterprise of global exploitation,

as opposed to conjugations. Because, finally, we should not cry too much about the wage earners since what was the great accomplishment realized by recent capitalism?

it is obvious that there is the chance there of a … of what I call, if you retain this terminological difference, of what I call the chance of a connection, a revolutionary connection, or a connection that would technically be called a “problematic connection”,

and that the situation at the geographical center and on the geographical periphery-Third World, tend to become or will tend to become more and more isomorphic. And I am saying, in the case of undecidable propositions, I am saying:

The Fourth Worlds are the Third Worlds which are constituted in the very center because, that is, in the old territories of the center, because the center has been deterritorialized and can be realized at the very periphery.

but that one had to assign Third Worlds in the process of being formed at the very center of the system. So there, obviously, that seems to me very … very important for the future — we’ll see in what sense — this formation of new Third Worlds or what we have sometimes called: “Fourth Worlds”.