There's very compelling evidence and reasoning for its employment as a professional tool for scientific fields like medicine and astronomy within which you have to crunch a lot of huge numbers and look for patterns.

But for the artist? Maybe as a smart Ctrl+V?

For the rest of us? HAH no.

I've met a few research scientists and IT number crunchers and their reactions have been the same:

They loathe it being foist upon literally everything in a repeat of the Dotcom bubble, but they sing its praises when it comes to sorting through a lot of a data.

I believe the comparison to VR is quite adequate. I don't feel it's 1 to 1 since this a development that we don't really need this in the consumer market, but I feel it's way more accurate than NFT and crypto comparisons.

I fly for a living, so I meet a lot of different professionals.

I'm just saying Duluth is very nice and Bumfuck Nowhere, Midwestia is complete ass, but our elected officials all seem to think we need to coddle those latter assholes while the former can fend for themselves.

That is so fun to pull off and take like 50 bugs out at once.

I have a recoiless solution for those. Failing that, a revolving one!

That does make sense, when you think about it.

There's actually some pretty interesting history behind the Galileo: www.youtube.com/watch?v=jtWq...

Everybody loves Oddjob until I hover my cursor over him in Goldeneye 64.

It wouldn't be hockey if the folks on the ice didn't throw fists now and again, regardless of who said folks are.

No matter the rule set, I think we all have to scratch that itch for some 'old time hockey' one way or another.

Also, Jocelyne Lamoureux-Davidson's deke at the 2018 Pyeongchang games to clinch Gold for the US in a shootout vs. Canada was pinnacle and I will not be accepting any arguments.