@denverdem.bsky.social
What is there to review?
Can you share one vaccine that has been shown to improve health or prevent disease compared to not taking the vaccine?
Serious question.
You confuse faith with science, please open your eyes.
Can you share one vaccine that has been shown to improve health or prevent disease compared to not taking the vaccine?
Serious question.
You confuse faith with science, please open your eyes.
August 24, 2025 at 2:15 AM
What is there to review?
Can you share one vaccine that has been shown to improve health or prevent disease compared to not taking the vaccine?
Serious question.
You confuse faith with science, please open your eyes.
Can you share one vaccine that has been shown to improve health or prevent disease compared to not taking the vaccine?
Serious question.
You confuse faith with science, please open your eyes.
I can't keep reading these papers because the authors are so ignorant and misleading my head will explode.
But this is the pathetic state of "evidence" used by people who push vaccines on pregnant women.
It doesn't get more dumb than this
www.nejm.org/doi/full/10....
But this is the pathetic state of "evidence" used by people who push vaccines on pregnant women.
It doesn't get more dumb than this
www.nejm.org/doi/full/10....
Effectiveness of Maternal Influenza Immunization in Mothers and Infants | NEJM
Young infants and pregnant women are at increased risk for serious consequences of
influenza infection. Inactivated influenza vaccine is recommended for pregnant women
but is not licensed for infan...
www.nejm.org
July 21, 2025 at 6:25 AM
I can't keep reading these papers because the authors are so ignorant and misleading my head will explode.
But this is the pathetic state of "evidence" used by people who push vaccines on pregnant women.
It doesn't get more dumb than this
www.nejm.org/doi/full/10....
But this is the pathetic state of "evidence" used by people who push vaccines on pregnant women.
It doesn't get more dumb than this
www.nejm.org/doi/full/10....
I'm sure there may be, so why not share these studies so people can educate themselves?
I would love to read the paper that you claim shows that injecting pregnant women with biological material leads to improved health outcomes.
I am fairly certain you just made that up.
I would love to read the paper that you claim shows that injecting pregnant women with biological material leads to improved health outcomes.
I am fairly certain you just made that up.
July 21, 2025 at 6:20 AM
I'm sure there may be, so why not share these studies so people can educate themselves?
I would love to read the paper that you claim shows that injecting pregnant women with biological material leads to improved health outcomes.
I am fairly certain you just made that up.
I would love to read the paper that you claim shows that injecting pregnant women with biological material leads to improved health outcomes.
I am fairly certain you just made that up.
I think ai will be a good for all the "not pop" music out there in the next few years. People are already pushing back against AI-made music, so I bet we'll see more unique, human-made stuff and more people playing weird music
There has been no money selling records decades .
There has been no money selling records decades .
July 8, 2025 at 11:50 AM
I think ai will be a good for all the "not pop" music out there in the next few years. People are already pushing back against AI-made music, so I bet we'll see more unique, human-made stuff and more people playing weird music
There has been no money selling records decades .
There has been no money selling records decades .
Biologically men have penises and woman have vaginas.
Women give birth to babies.
The distinction is clear.
Gender on the other hand is indeed a construct. A person decides their gender.
Women give birth to babies.
The distinction is clear.
Gender on the other hand is indeed a construct. A person decides their gender.
July 8, 2025 at 11:40 AM
Biologically men have penises and woman have vaginas.
Women give birth to babies.
The distinction is clear.
Gender on the other hand is indeed a construct. A person decides their gender.
Women give birth to babies.
The distinction is clear.
Gender on the other hand is indeed a construct. A person decides their gender.
Seems relevant to point out that the study you shared did not even attempt to show improved health.
Also relevant that the covid19 vaccine clinical trials were the most high quality studies I have ever seen for any vaccine.
It is all downhill from there.
Also relevant that the covid19 vaccine clinical trials were the most high quality studies I have ever seen for any vaccine.
It is all downhill from there.
February 4, 2025 at 1:56 AM
Seems relevant to point out that the study you shared did not even attempt to show improved health.
Also relevant that the covid19 vaccine clinical trials were the most high quality studies I have ever seen for any vaccine.
It is all downhill from there.
Also relevant that the covid19 vaccine clinical trials were the most high quality studies I have ever seen for any vaccine.
It is all downhill from there.
A 2 month clinical trial?
That clinical trial didn't attempt to show anything other than a reduction in positive testing in the vaccine group.
The 6 month follow up to that study clearly shows the risk outweighs any benefit from the vaccine.
www.nejm.org/doi/full/10....
That clinical trial didn't attempt to show anything other than a reduction in positive testing in the vaccine group.
The 6 month follow up to that study clearly shows the risk outweighs any benefit from the vaccine.
www.nejm.org/doi/full/10....
February 4, 2025 at 1:54 AM
A 2 month clinical trial?
That clinical trial didn't attempt to show anything other than a reduction in positive testing in the vaccine group.
The 6 month follow up to that study clearly shows the risk outweighs any benefit from the vaccine.
www.nejm.org/doi/full/10....
That clinical trial didn't attempt to show anything other than a reduction in positive testing in the vaccine group.
The 6 month follow up to that study clearly shows the risk outweighs any benefit from the vaccine.
www.nejm.org/doi/full/10....
Yes I did read the article, you claimed that not many children are genitally mutilated.
I pointed out that most harm comes from giving children harmful hormones
I pointed out that most harm comes from giving children harmful hormones
February 4, 2025 at 1:47 AM
Yes I did read the article, you claimed that not many children are genitally mutilated.
I pointed out that most harm comes from giving children harmful hormones
I pointed out that most harm comes from giving children harmful hormones
You must be a biologist
February 4, 2025 at 1:46 AM
You must be a biologist
All licensed inactivated influenza vaccines on the market are categorized either as products for which “there are no adequate and well-controlled studies in pregnant women” or “there are no adequate and well-controlled studies in humans”
doi.org/10.1016/j.aj...
doi.org/10.1016/j.aj...
Redirecting
doi.org
February 3, 2025 at 11:52 PM
All licensed inactivated influenza vaccines on the market are categorized either as products for which “there are no adequate and well-controlled studies in pregnant women” or “there are no adequate and well-controlled studies in humans”
doi.org/10.1016/j.aj...
doi.org/10.1016/j.aj...
Why does the skin color of the caretaker matter?
February 3, 2025 at 11:42 PM
Why does the skin color of the caretaker matter?
So fires caused by arson are due to climate?
February 3, 2025 at 11:39 PM
So fires caused by arson are due to climate?
For a vaccine to be justified it must be shown to prevent more harm than it causes.
Can you share a clinical trial that justifies the use of any specific vaccine?
Can you share a clinical trial that justifies the use of any specific vaccine?
February 3, 2025 at 11:36 PM
For a vaccine to be justified it must be shown to prevent more harm than it causes.
Can you share a clinical trial that justifies the use of any specific vaccine?
Can you share a clinical trial that justifies the use of any specific vaccine?
Have you considered asking transgender people when they believe the appropriate age for these life changing surgeries?
Children are put on hormone blockers which have significant negative health impacts.
A child can choose to be whatever gender they want without harm , why harm them physically?
Children are put on hormone blockers which have significant negative health impacts.
A child can choose to be whatever gender they want without harm , why harm them physically?
February 3, 2025 at 11:34 PM
Have you considered asking transgender people when they believe the appropriate age for these life changing surgeries?
Children are put on hormone blockers which have significant negative health impacts.
A child can choose to be whatever gender they want without harm , why harm them physically?
Children are put on hormone blockers which have significant negative health impacts.
A child can choose to be whatever gender they want without harm , why harm them physically?
I fail to see how the paper supports your claim , "Climate Change Drives Biodiversity Shifts"
The shows that changing temperatures impact biodiversity.
You can't blame humans for both increasing and decreasing global temperatures.
Did you read the paper?
The shows that changing temperatures impact biodiversity.
You can't blame humans for both increasing and decreasing global temperatures.
Did you read the paper?
February 3, 2025 at 11:20 PM
I fail to see how the paper supports your claim , "Climate Change Drives Biodiversity Shifts"
The shows that changing temperatures impact biodiversity.
You can't blame humans for both increasing and decreasing global temperatures.
Did you read the paper?
The shows that changing temperatures impact biodiversity.
You can't blame humans for both increasing and decreasing global temperatures.
Did you read the paper?
Your appeal to authority is interesting but thankfully science doesn't care about consensus
February 3, 2025 at 9:18 PM
Your appeal to authority is interesting but thankfully science doesn't care about consensus
Most peer reviewed papers are false.
Peer review is anti science.
Peer review is anti science.
February 3, 2025 at 9:12 PM
Most peer reviewed papers are false.
Peer review is anti science.
Peer review is anti science.
In the end the scientific method is the best framework for trying to understand the universe.
Peer review has no place in science.
An experiment must be replicated before it is considered valid.
Peer review has no place in science.
An experiment must be replicated before it is considered valid.
February 3, 2025 at 9:11 PM
In the end the scientific method is the best framework for trying to understand the universe.
Peer review has no place in science.
An experiment must be replicated before it is considered valid.
Peer review has no place in science.
An experiment must be replicated before it is considered valid.
Peer review is anti science.
Replication should replace peer review
Replication should replace peer review
February 3, 2025 at 9:09 PM
Peer review is anti science.
Replication should replace peer review
Replication should replace peer review
"Transgender" is a science based term?
Men cannot get pregnant, unless of course you know of an experiment that supports the claim that humans can reproduce asexually?
Men cannot get pregnant, unless of course you know of an experiment that supports the claim that humans can reproduce asexually?
February 3, 2025 at 9:06 PM
"Transgender" is a science based term?
Men cannot get pregnant, unless of course you know of an experiment that supports the claim that humans can reproduce asexually?
Men cannot get pregnant, unless of course you know of an experiment that supports the claim that humans can reproduce asexually?
It was pus and scabs.
Jenner assumed that these contained a pathogen without evidence.
Jenner assumed that these contained a pathogen without evidence.
February 3, 2025 at 8:59 PM
It was pus and scabs.
Jenner assumed that these contained a pathogen without evidence.
Jenner assumed that these contained a pathogen without evidence.
None of the sources cited provide any evidence that the benefits provided by the vaccine outweigh the harms.
Have you even read the clinical trial results? Why are you misinterpreting that article?
Have you even read the clinical trial results? Why are you misinterpreting that article?
February 3, 2025 at 10:43 AM
None of the sources cited provide any evidence that the benefits provided by the vaccine outweigh the harms.
Have you even read the clinical trial results? Why are you misinterpreting that article?
Have you even read the clinical trial results? Why are you misinterpreting that article?
Well we could always go back to that thing they call the scientific method.
Where replication replaces peer review
Where replication replaces peer review
February 3, 2025 at 10:12 AM
Well we could always go back to that thing they call the scientific method.
Where replication replaces peer review
Where replication replaces peer review
scholar.archive.org works better anyways
Internet Archive Scholar
scholar.archive.org
February 3, 2025 at 10:10 AM
scholar.archive.org works better anyways
If HPV vaccines are safe why don't you share the actual results from the clinical trials?
Seems wise in this climate
Seems wise in this climate
February 3, 2025 at 10:08 AM
If HPV vaccines are safe why don't you share the actual results from the clinical trials?
Seems wise in this climate
Seems wise in this climate