Given the aggressive 'pull-to-par' on the short end of the gilt curve, you've not been tempted to crystalise those tax-free gains early and reallocate into longer-duration gilts, locking in elevated yields?

I see they mistakenly used ‘history’ as the last word here instead of ‘lifespan’.

After serving on a jury, I came away thinking I’d personally prefer a judge-led trial. A judge is trained in the law, understands the process, and treats it as a professional duty.. That said, I don’t agree with Lammy’s proposal.

Those are just details for someone else to worry about. He doesn't *do* details.

Maybe I’m being unreasonable, but I’d prefer to be told the *most* I’m going to have to pay before making a journey, rather than just accept whatever’s calculated for me once I’m already committed.

People don’t bother looking into policy - they’re attracted to boorish loudmouths who rubbish what’s being done and suggest it’s easy to fix through common sense.

Isn't the game plan to suppress the base rate, fuel inflation to erode the real value of government debt, and lean on quantitative easing to keep markets afloat?

How about this approach, BBC - you welcome and broadcast this documentary, while being simultaneously receptive to any other similarly fact-checked documentary which demonstrates that Israel isn’t committing war crimes.

I think you want Steve McGarrett - but from the original Hawaii Five-O and not the more recent series where they dangle suspects over the edge of buildings or throw them into shark tanks (I kid thee not).

I’ve always favoured in-person exams. Even before AI, what was to stop someone from soliciting help from another party to improve their submission?