Answer the question I asked you and there's your answer.

Not sure where you entered the discussion. My stance has been,& is, effective campaigning.

When Harris only bested Trump by 3% of the independent vote it calls into question messaging. Some issues are best left to solving once elected. Or in Trump's case fucking things up.

How do you explain it?

Not sure where you entered the discussion. My stance has been,& is, effective campaigning.

When Harris only bested Trump by 3% of the independent vote it calls into question messaging. Some issues are best left to solving once elected. Or in Trump's case fucking things up.

How do you explain it?

For not mentioning or even indicating anything to do with race?

Actually, the mark of a racist is one who stoops to bringing color into the discussion.

Explain in detail what did and why Harris only bested Trump by 3% of the independent vote.

I'm actually far left. No Republican has ever received my vote...for anything.

This discussion isn't about me. Independents will look toward a candidate that will be closer to center. How come Harris, with a better economic policy, only took a 3% margin in independents over Trump's centrist lies.

Please explain how Harris only bested Trump in 2024 by 3% of independent voters, those claiming no party affiliation.

Regardless of her stronger economic policy what was it that didn't win over the independents by a far greater margin?

Ok, then what did happen?

Start with who won the kitchen table battle.

Bonds account for less than half of the Euro US investment. Stock and other holdings make up the rest.

Any strong movement against any would rattle the US economy and send a strong message.

While his policies were left leaning toward climate, infrastructure & economics, when Harris took over she brought the social programs front & center as a top priority.

Although important, it showed in her loss it was a failure to read the electorate room which wasn't enough to win independents.