Djordje Sredanovic
@djsredanovic.bsky.social
690 followers 430 following 210 posts
Sociologist - citizenship/Brexit/migration/media/race&ethnicity/work Lecturer in Sociology at the University of Chester/collaborateur scientifique at GERME laboratory, Université libre de Bruxelles
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
djsredanovic.bsky.social
Our book Brexit and Citizens' Rights is now out. We discuss Brexit and its impact on the rights of different groups of citizens: British, EU27, third country nationals, in the UK and in the EU.
djsredanovic.bsky.social
That's the definition of ethnography/participant observation from Malinowski on, but I am not sure whether this is what you had in mind.
Reposted by Djordje Sredanovic
detentionaction.bsky.social
People seeking asylum are given only seven days to challenge their removal to France. Predictably, the system in place to provide legal support for people in detention is failing. Some are unable to obtain legal representation and end up missing crucial deadlines.
Reposted by Djordje Sredanovic
wegschaider.bsky.social
🤔 Curious about our new open access dataset on migrant electoral rights?

Join us for the webinar to get an overview. 📊
globalcit.bsky.social
🚨 Webinar Alert 🚨

Join us for the online launch of the new Migrant Electoral Rights (MER) Dataset, the most comprehensive global dataset on migrant suffrage to date 🌐

📅 Oct 15 | 17:00 CEST
📍 Online
🔗 Register www.eui.eu/events?id=58...
djsredanovic.bsky.social
Minor point but was the item 'extreme' or 'racist' views? I think there are slivers of the public that consider Reform racist but not extreme, or extreme but not racist
djsredanovic.bsky.social
Also this is an old failed policy from 2008 (at the time it was for citizenship rather than for permanent residence). It's as Labour had a side project to recycle policies that were scrapped in 2010.
djsredanovic.bsky.social
This (but for citizenship rather than ILR) was already in a Green Paper under Labour in 2008. It was criticised a lot already at the time, and was scrapped as undoable under the Coalition.
djsredanovic.bsky.social
Labour had this idea as a citizenship requirement in the 2008 Green Paper. It was bad policy then, and nothing came from it because they lost the 2010 elections. Aren't there any new ideas that Labour could think of?
hleehurley.com
"Migrants will have to carry out community work or volunteering to qualify to permanently remain in the UK, according to the Home Secretary." [Telegraph]
djsredanovic.bsky.social
I am not based in London but Skoob is the best for me, among other good shops. However I am mostly after paperbacks from the 1970s on, not mid-century hardbacks as the author of the blog.
djsredanovic.bsky.social
The society named after the idea of waiting as the best policy is now apparently "radical left"
djsredanovic.bsky.social
There is a 2019 High Court decision confirming the discriminatory effects of Right to Rent, and the research of Colin and others
Reposted by Djordje Sredanovic
colinyeo.bsky.social
1/ There’s quite a lot of misunderstanding by good journalists about how right to work checks operate. It’s not illegal to work without having provided proof of your right, as James goes on to say later in the thread. And employers are not under a legal duty to conduct checks: ID is not mandatory.
jamesrball.com
Not sure day one of the latest ID card rollout went very well at all, not least because the government couldn’t answer the absolute core question about why they’re being introduced.

The case is that digital ID will be required for anyone to get work. The problem is ID is already mandatory. 🧵
djsredanovic.bsky.social
I would say Britain has a residual tendency to think in terms of 'freedom from the state', rather than 'freedom through the state' as happens on the continent. But yes, the British Home Secretary has some scary powers (although luckily they do not exercise them personally).
djsredanovic.bsky.social
4) Generalised digital IDs have downsides and some upsides. Dematerialising the compulsory ID of most non-citizens in the UK had very little upside and made people vulnerable. That one would have been the policy to actually complain about
djsredanovic.bsky.social
3) The government is pushing the line that digital ID is necessary to avoid unauthorised work. There are already major checks that employers have to complete - if the idea is avoiding people to work on the identity of others it might add something, but at cost of even more cumbersome checks.
djsredanovic.bsky.social
2) Digital-only ID is a Global South creation, introduced by countries that would have struggled to find the resources to register and document the whole population. British arguments for digital-only ID (anti-forgery, avoiding ID confiscation from exploiters) are not very convincing
djsredanovic.bsky.social
Today we have the official government statements on digital ID and I would add a few things to what I am seeing on here. 1) The UK is an ID-poor country. The relative difficulty of getting a recognised ID, and the share of citizens without a recognised ID would be unthinkable in continental Europe.
djsredanovic.bsky.social
The biggest losers of this are undocumented migrants, who will see even less spaces in society they are not excluded for, but I am sadly confident that this government too sees this as a plus.
djsredanovic.bsky.social
I do not think there is ultimately a valid reason for digital ID, but I can see some for a mandatory ID (as long as it is free or almost free of costs, and there are extensive resources to get more vulnerable populations on the system)
djsredanovic.bsky.social
3) the pilot EU Settled Status was probably digital mostly to cut on costs. The UK probably would have the resources to put in infrastructures for routine in-person registration and the production of physical IDs as most European countries, but it would cost and take more time
djsredanovic.bsky.social
2) with the dematerialisation of almost all migration statuses (a much worse idea IMO), ID for all could normalise the procedures non-citizens go through, and if both groups are on the same digital platform it might make checkers more lenient of temporary server issues
djsredanovic.bsky.social
That said: 1) having undocumented (no passport or driving license) citizens in an age of extensive private ID checks is a major factor of exclusion, even without bad policies such as the Hostile Environment or voter ID to make things worse
djsredanovic.bsky.social
Digital ID is the worst of both worlds, but it is attractive for governments because the infrastructure needed to produce it is much cheaper (even if a lot of the costs is simply passed on to the individual)