(a) Conceptual metaphors (the balance scale, ex) are useful IF we know what general principle/understanding we are hoping to develop (and gimmicky and disconnected for kids otherwise). And…
(a) Conceptual metaphors (the balance scale, ex) are useful IF we know what general principle/understanding we are hoping to develop (and gimmicky and disconnected for kids otherwise). And…
This is about equivalence, at the core. But (many) kids don’t know that bc all we do is teach symbolic manipulation. “What is the value of each expression when x = 1? When x = 5? Will any of these expressions ALWAYS have the same value? How do you know for sure?”
This is about equivalence, at the core. But (many) kids don’t know that bc all we do is teach symbolic manipulation. “What is the value of each expression when x = 1? When x = 5? Will any of these expressions ALWAYS have the same value? How do you know for sure?”
Similarly, would want kids to understand WHY this makes sense (is true) not only THAT it is true. So, again a line of questioning like: “pick two points on f’(x). What do the coordinates mean? Based on that, when is f(x) increasing? Why?”
Similarly, would want kids to understand WHY this makes sense (is true) not only THAT it is true. So, again a line of questioning like: “pick two points on f’(x). What do the coordinates mean? Based on that, when is f(x) increasing? Why?”
So I would want kids to have an explanation for why this must be true. I can imagine several “age appropriate” justifications, but a teacher (or curriculum) would need to ask something like: “is 5 x 6 the same as 6 x 5? 3 x 7 and 7 x 3? Will this always be true? Why (not)?
So I would want kids to have an explanation for why this must be true. I can imagine several “age appropriate” justifications, but a teacher (or curriculum) would need to ask something like: “is 5 x 6 the same as 6 x 5? 3 x 7 and 7 x 3? Will this always be true? Why (not)?
The “why” feels practically inseparable from what I consider to be conceptual understanding. I personally find the provided definition to be very clear and practical. Here is how I see it as actionable, fwiw, using the examples in your post…
The “why” feels practically inseparable from what I consider to be conceptual understanding. I personally find the provided definition to be very clear and practical. Here is how I see it as actionable, fwiw, using the examples in your post…